[Paint Touches] Big East pundit projections 2018-’19

[PaintTouches]

Instead of using one projection to set as a baseline, we put them all together.

The middle of the conference is going to eat itself all year long. Be sure to check it out, the tiers aren't as self evident as many have assumed.

https://painttouches.com/2018/10/31/big-east-pundit-projections-2018-19/

[barfolomew]

Instead of using one projection to set as a baseline, we put them all together.

The middle of the conference is going to eat itself all year long. Be sure to check it out, the tiers aren't as self evident as many have assumed.

https://painttouches.com/2018/10/31/big-east-pundit-projections-2018-19/

Good stuff, Andrei.

Except that I did hold those tiers to be self-evident.
That not all teams are created equal.
That they were endowed by their commissioner with certain inalienable ranks.

[PaintTouches]

Except that I did hold those tiers to be self-evident.
That not all teams are created equal.
That they were endowed by their commissioner with certain inalienable ranks.

That among these are 3s, eFG% and freedom of movement?

[TAMU, Knower of Ball]

Assuming the national projections are correct, Marquette at home would be a Q1 victory, no?

[Benny B]

Instead of using one projection to set as a baseline, we put them all together.

The middle of the conference is going to eat itself all year long. Be sure to check it out, the tiers aren't as self evident as many have assumed.

https://painttouches.com/2018/10/31/big-east-pundit-projections-2018-19/

Andrei -- Curious as to why are Nova & MU, CU and Derp listed in their rank-appropriate columns, yet everyone else is scattered around in the middle.  I get that you're probably grouping in columns by tier, but even so, why list PC 3rd when it seems they're a consensus 6th?

[SaveOD238]

That among these are 3s, eFG% and freedom of movement?

That to secure these statistics, coaches are instituted among teams, deriving their just whistles from the consent of the governed?

[PaintTouches]

Assuming the national projections are correct, Marquette at home would be a Q1 victory, no?

As usual, TAMU is correct. For some reason thought Q1 was up to the top-25, but it's actually top-30. Thanks for checking!

Andrei -- Curious as to why are Nova & MU, CU and Derp listed in their rank-appropriate columns, yet everyone else is scattered around in the middle.  I get that you're probably grouping in columns by tier, but even so, why list PC 3rd when it seems they're a consensus 6th?

I started the original groupings based off the Big East preseason coaches poll and then failed to adjust.

[Silkk the Shaka]

Move over JayBee's Vikings, there's a new #Consensus in town

#DePaulDeSucks

[Dawson Rental]

I agree with KenPom, Creighton will be better than most think.