DukeScoop asking same stuff about Bagley that some here asking about Markus

[MU82]

Duke is 4-0 without Marvin Bagley, the freshman sensation who had been (and might still be) in many Player of the Year conversations.

So naturally, plenty of Dookie fans are asking the same questions some here are asking about the Warriors in regards to our own injured 18-year-old.

http://www.newsobserver.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/luke-decock/article201487329.html

The "nut graf" (as we journalists like to say):

While there is no shortage of conspiracy theories about Bagley's extended absence – now four times as long as Grayson Allen's indefinite suspension – and an equal number of barroom arguments over whether Duke is better with or without him, the reality is that Duke has been different without Bagley: more efficient defensively and more balanced offensively, although some of that may have nothing to do with whether the freshman is in the lineup.

Can Duke win the national title without Bagley?

Can we make it into the NCAAs without Markus?

[skianth16]

Any Titus fans out there heard this on One Shining Podcast recently too. The numbers really are kind of hard to overlook since he's been out.

It's kind of weird how closely the MU and Duke situations resemble each other.

[ZiggysFryBoy]

DukeScoop sounds like what dog owners have to do in the spring.

[GooooMarquette]

DukeScoop sounds like what dog owners have to do in the spring.

Except it's a year-round thing down in NC.

[BrewCity83]

It's clear that Wojo and Coach K have been scheming this together.