collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by NCMUFan
[Today at 05:02:55 PM]


Scouting Report: Ian Miletic by BE_GoldenEagle
[Today at 03:39:36 PM]


Pearson to MU by WhiteTrash
[Today at 03:30:09 PM]


NM by The Sultan
[Today at 03:10:35 PM]


What is the actual gap between Marquette and the top of the Big East by MU82
[Today at 09:26:42 AM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by Aircraftcarrier
[May 18, 2025, 06:49:48 PM]


2026 Bracketology by MU82
[May 18, 2025, 02:32:12 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


WarriorDad

Quote from: Jay Bee on March 04, 2018, 02:08:35 PM
In theory, recent games do mean more. On the team sheets, rankings of a predictive model are used, and that model includes a recency bias.

You have more knowledge on this than I and would enjoy understanding more if you can shed some light.  When you say team sheets, do you mean these?  https://i.turner.ncaa.com/sites/default/files/images/2017/12/04/team_sheet_guide1.pdf

The rankings of predictive models you mention, are those boxes 4, 5 and 6?  I did not realize those predictive models have added values or a recency bias built in, am I understanding you correctly based on your comments?

In last months SI they were saying no recency bias exists and that seems to line up with the CBS article, so there is some confusion based on the mock seeding exercise the committee at the time.    https://www.si.com/college-basketball/2018/02/12/ncaa-tournament-seeding-bracket-top-16-breakdown-march-madness
"No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth."
— Plato

Previous topic - Next topic