Main Menu
collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

NIL Money by ATL MU Warrior
[Today at 06:15:35 PM]


2025-26 Schedule by #UnleashSean
[Today at 05:24:46 PM]


APR Updates by #UnleashSean
[Today at 05:23:40 PM]


More conference realignment talk by Uncle Rico
[Today at 02:15:21 PM]


Kam update by MarquetteMike1977
[May 05, 2025, 08:26:53 PM]


Brad Stevens on recruit rankings and "culture" by MU82
[May 05, 2025, 04:42:00 PM]


2025 Coaching Carousel by MarquetteBasketballfan69
[May 05, 2025, 12:15:13 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!



MU82

Cardinals are toast.

Will the same be true of the Brewers one week from now? It's certainly possible.

Still, as a guy without a horse in the race who just wants the race to be great, I'm rooting for Milwaukee to get hot, sweep the Cubbies from Thu-Sun, and make this thing really interesting.

P.S.: Gotta take care of business vs. Pirates first, or else the Cubbie series won't matter.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

MUBurrow

Its probably irrelevant if the Crew don't basically win each series the rest of the way, but if they're able to do that, I'm not sure if they have better odds at catching the Cubbies or the Rockies. They're 4 back of the Cubs, who are certainly a better team than Colorado, and only 2.5 back of the Rockies. But the schedules are weird. The 4 game series against ChC could swing the gap in a hurry, and the Cubs have the Rays and at StL left on the schedule, when they're slated to face Weaver, Martinez, Wacha, Lynn. Colorado meanwhile has SF, then SD, then Mia, and finishes with the Dodgers. But the Dodgers aren't probably going to run full strength lineups out there, and I would venture to guess there's almost zero chance that the Dodgers actually pitch their rotation as currently scheduled (Hill, Ryu, Kershaw).

Jockey

Quote from: MUBurrow on September 18, 2017, 10:43:07 AM
But the Dodgers aren't probably going to run full strength lineups out there, and I would venture to guess there's almost zero chance that the Dodgers actually pitch their rotation as currently scheduled (Hill, Ryu, Kershaw).

I'm guessing they will, but not in that order. Also, I wouldn't expect to see Kershaw or Hill go more than 5 or 6 innings.

Benny B

Quote from: MUBurrow on September 18, 2017, 10:43:07 AM
But the Dodgers aren't probably going to run full strength lineups out there, and I would venture to guess there's almost zero chance that the Dodgers actually pitch their rotation as currently scheduled (Hill, Ryu, Kershaw).

First game of NLDS is Friday following, so bank on Kershaw pitching the last day of the season. 

Additionally... having spent a nice chunk on the DL recently (not to mention less-than-stellar performances his last three starts) and with normal rest in front of him, I have a hard time believing DR would yank him early in game 162.

Quote from: LittleMurs on January 08, 2015, 07:10:33 PM
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny.  Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.

MerrittsMustache

Quote from: Benny B on September 19, 2017, 02:22:40 PM
First game of NLDS is Friday following, so bank on Kershaw pitching the last day of the season. 

Additionally... having spent a nice chunk on the DL recently (not to mention less-than-stellar performances his last three starts) and with normal rest in front of him, I have a hard time believing DR would yank him early in game 162.

If Kershaw puts in a solid 5 innings against the Rockies, he's coming out of the game. No brainer. Especially with another potential match-up against Colorado looming in the NLDS. In the game 162, have him get his work in and get him out of there.


TAMU, Knower of Ball

Pet peeve for baseball announcers. When they say phrases like this: "That's not a strike...well, its going to be a strike on the K zone....but I don't think it should be a strike."
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


drewm88

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on September 19, 2017, 03:46:31 PM
Pet peeve for baseball announcers. When they say phrases like this: "That's not a strike...well, its going to be a strike on the K zone....but I don't think it should be a strike."

I don't think I've ever heard that. Who've you been listening to?

Benny B

Quote from: MerrittsMustache on September 19, 2017, 02:42:13 PM
If Kershaw puts in a solid 5 innings against the Rockies, he's coming out of the game. No brainer. Especially with another potential match-up against Colorado looming in the NLDS. In the game 162, have him get his work in and get him out of there.

The Venn diagram between has more overlap than a pedophile dressed up as Santa Claus.  IOW, I think we're in agreement that Kershaw isn't going the distance in g162 regardless of pitch count but he's also not going out there with a hard pitch count in the 50's.
Quote from: LittleMurs on January 08, 2015, 07:10:33 PM
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny.  Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.

buckchuckler

Quote from: drewm88 on September 19, 2017, 03:59:42 PM
I don't think I've ever heard that. Who've you been listening to?

Thought the same thing.

Archies Bat

Quote from: drewm88 on September 19, 2017, 03:59:42 PM
I don't think I've ever heard that. Who've you been listening to?

Sounds like something a Cubs fan would say.

jesmu84

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on September 19, 2017, 03:46:31 PM
Pet peeve for baseball announcers. When they say phrases like this: "That's not a strike...well, its going to be a strike on the K zone....but I don't think it should be a strike."

Need robots/video/technology for balls/strikes. Need it now.

buckchuckler

Quote from: jesmu84 on September 19, 2017, 05:50:43 PM
Need robots/video/technology for balls/strikes. Need it now.

I agree. If for nothing else, just to end the "pitch framing" madness. 

GB Warrior

Quote from: buckchuckler on September 19, 2017, 06:22:34 PM
I agree. If for nothing else, just to end the "pitch framing" madness.

Such grit!


drewm88

Quote from: Archies Bat on September 19, 2017, 05:30:40 PM
Sounds like something a Cubs fan would say.

With one of our own calling the games, of course Cubs fans don't hear the dumb crap like that.

jesmu84


Dr. Blackheart

Quote from: jesmu84 on September 19, 2017, 09:14:41 PM
9



Brew Crew holding strong, though, with Cubs coming to town.

Vander Blue Man Group

Thanks for nothing, Pirates.

jsglow


Jockey

Quote from: buckchuckler on September 19, 2017, 06:22:34 PM
I agree. If for nothing else, just to end the "pitch framing" madness.

Just the fact that we have pitch framing and some catchers are much better than others is proof enough we need robot umps calling balls/strikes. The location of the pitch should determine whether a pitch is a ball or strike. How the catcher catches it should be no factor.

It will come when the technology is there. It's close, but not quite there yet.

🏀

Quote from: Jockey on September 19, 2017, 10:38:08 PM
Just the fact that we have pitch framing and some catchers are much better than others is proof enough we need robot umps calling balls/strikes. The location of the pitch should determine whether a pitch is a ball or strike. How the catcher catches it should be no factor.

It will come when the technology is there. It's close, but not quite there yet.

This.

I think the pitch tracking technology is there, but the delivery system needs further development.

CTWarrior

Quote from: PTM on September 20, 2017, 05:43:35 AM
This.

I think the pitch tracking technology is there, but the delivery system needs further development.

On the Bryant Gumbel Sports show on HBO they had a former player (I forget which) call games using the technology.  He got a little beep or buzz in ear buds when it was a strike.  It was easy for a technician to change the strike zone batter to batter.  No issues in the game.  No need to wait too long IMO.  Umps can always go back to current method if tech fails.

I agree 100% that if pitch framing is a thing, then something needs to be done.  When I umped youth sports I discouraged catchers from doing it by telling them, "when you move the glove after you catch it, it means to me you didn't think it was a strike and I will make the call accordingly."  At the youth age they aren't too subtle about it and it is easy to catch.  Thinking back, I was probably doing them a disservice since pitch framing is apparently a skill worth refining.
Calvin:  I'm a genius.  But I'm a misunderstood genius. 
Hobbes:  What's misunderstood about you?
Calvin:  Nobody thinks I'm a genius.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

One game back of the Rockies. Les go!
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


jsglow

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on September 20, 2017, 08:15:00 AM
One game back of the Rockies. Les go!

Win tonight and take 3/4 this weekend and the last week of the season is going to be incredible regardless of the final outcome.

Previous topic - Next topic