collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

NIL Money by BCHoopster
[Today at 11:56:37 AM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by MuMark
[Today at 11:47:00 AM]


Congrats to Royce by DoctorV
[May 24, 2025, 10:38:33 PM]


Let's talk about the roster/recruits w/Shaka by Jay Bee
[May 23, 2025, 08:31:14 PM]


Pearson to MU by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[May 23, 2025, 08:12:08 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: Lennys Tap on January 11, 2017, 10:42:11 PM
You cannot be serious. That shot, made or missed, was as bad as the one Buycks took against Louisville a few years back. There was 2:16 left in the game and 26 seconds left on the shot clock. And we're up 8. We don't need a stinking "dagger". We need the clock to move and to make free throws. Seton Hall ended up scoring and cutting the lead to 6 fifteen seconds BEFORE we even needed to launch a shot. Dumb, dumb, dumb, low bball IQ move by a grad transfer senior.

I am serious. I personally am not a fan of running out the clock until under 2 minutes left. Katin had a wide open three. Its unlikely they were going to get a better shot than that. I'd rather take a better shot with an extra 10-25 seconds on the clock (unlikely they were actually going to run out the rest of the clock) than a poor shot with less time. Under two minutes, a different story. Others may have a different opinion. That's fine.
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


MUfan12

Quote from: Lennys Tap on January 11, 2017, 10:55:04 PM
But if you're not at least a little concerned about a near epic collapse down the stretch (our second in 10 days) you're not being realistic.

A little concerned? I guess. But it took Carrington hitting 50+ feet worth of contested threes, and unfortunately Haanif missed those two FTs. It's not like they turned it over twice like in Newark.

Newsdreams

Quote from: mayfairskatingrink on January 11, 2017, 08:33:16 PM
Is Seton Hall really an NCAA tourney team?
Yep so far. They have been getting top 25 votes. Plus are in in most "brackets"
Goal is National Championship
CBP profile my people who landed here over 100 yrs before Mayflower. Most I've had to deal with are ignorant & low IQ.
Can't believe we're living in the land of F 452/1984/Animal Farm/Brave New World/Handmaid's Tale. When travel to Mars begins, expect Starship Troopers

PGsHeroes32

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on January 11, 2017, 11:01:00 PM
I am serious. I personally am not a fan of running out the clock until under 2 minutes left. Katin had a wide open three. Its unlikely they were going to get a better shot than that. I'd rather take a better shot with an extra 10-25 seconds on the clock (unlikely they were actually going to run out the rest of the clock) than a poor shot with less time. Under two minutes, a different story. Others may have a different opinion. That's fine.

I don't like stallball either but that's an awful shot.

The one thing we've done a good job at is killkng clock while not full blown stalling. It's usually Marcus driving around and then ball movement for a good late shot
Lazar picking up where the BIG 3 left off....

Lennys Tap

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on January 11, 2017, 11:01:00 PM
I am serious. I personally am not a fan of running out the clock until under 2 minutes left. Katin had a wide open three. Its unlikely they were going to get a better shot than that. I'd rather take a better shot with an extra 10-25 seconds on the clock (unlikely they were actually going to run out the rest of the clock) than a poor shot with less time. Under two minutes, a different story. Others may have a different opinion. That's fine.

OMG. Good clock management is math. You're not a fan of math? I hate it when teams  milk the clock up 3 or 4 with 4 minutes left but up 8 with an opportunity to take it under 1:50 it is wrong to launch a 3 with 26 seconds on the clock. Period. Any coach who tells you different should be fired from his job even if it's coaching 5th grade boys or girls.

Dr. Blackheart

Quote from: Lennys Tap on January 11, 2017, 11:28:18 PM
OMG. Good clock management is math. You're not a fan of math? I hate it when teams  milk the clock up 3 or 4 with 4 minutes left but up 8 with an opportunity to take it under 1:50 it is wrong to launch a 3 with 26 seconds on the clock. Period. Any coach who tells you different should be fired from his job even if it's coaching 5th grade boys or girls.

That shot by Chuck Reinhardt was brutal...more than the game turning from scoring to winding it down.  He was wide open as a shooter could be but he also had a clear path to the hoop and a sure foul with key Hall players in trouble.  It is a game of attrition, baby

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: Lennys Tap on January 11, 2017, 11:28:18 PM
OMG. Good clock management is math. You're not a fan of math? I hate it when teams  milk the clock up 3 or 4 with 4 minutes left but up 8 with an opportunity to take it under 1:50 it is wrong to launch a 3 with 26 seconds on the clock. Period. Any coach who tells you different should be fired from his job even if it's coaching 5th grade boys or girls.

You disagree. That's fine. For this team, I prefer taking good shots when they are available. Others prefer to milk the clock. With a defense like ours, and two studs like Carrington and Rodriguez, I think 1:50 is plenty of time to make up an 8 point deficit. If we had a team of lockdown defenders, I would think differently. But our team's strength is scoring so I'd rather take the open shot.
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: Dr. Blackheart on January 11, 2017, 11:35:23 PM
That shot by Chuck Reinhardt was brutal...more than the game turning from scoring to winding it down.  He was wide open as a shooter could be but he also had a clear path to the hoop and a sure foul with key Hall players in trouble.  It is a game of attrition, baby

This I can get behind. If Katin had a clear path to the hoop than he should have done that instead of taking the three. Always look for the highest % shot.
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


wadesworld

Quote from: mayfairskatingrink on January 11, 2017, 08:33:16 PM
Is Seton Hall really an NCAA tourney team?

At least one, if not both, of them or us are.

Marcus92

Right now we're tied with Seton Hall for 5th in the conference standings. The Big East will likely get at least 5 bids — that's happened the past 2 years (with 6 bids in 2015). So we're both in the running.
"Let's get a green drink!" Famous last words

WellsstreetWanderer

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on January 11, 2017, 11:39:38 PM
You disagree. That's fine. For this team, I prefer taking good shots when they are available. Others prefer to milk the clock. With a defense like ours, and two studs like Carrington and Rodriguez, I think 1:50 is plenty of time to make up an 8 point deficit. If we had a team of lockdown defenders, I would think differently. But our team's strength is scoring so I'd rather take the open shot.
Precisely because they are such good shooters I would opt to give them less time to be able to catch up
IMHO. He should have held back on the shot

Loose Cannon



  Yep, Rehash plays of the game, and Dissect whatever stats you want, But I'm sitting in the Sunshine of a Win and loving it.

Next Game up.
" Love is Space and Time measured by the Heart. "  M Proust

PGsHeroes32

Quote from: Loose Cannon on January 12, 2017, 07:24:30 AM

  Yep, Rehash plays of the game, and Dissect whatever stats you want, But I'm sitting in the Sunshine of a Win and loving it.

Next Game up.

Great, Wojo will be dissecting it too. Win by 30 or lose by 30 it's part of sports.
Lazar picking up where the BIG 3 left off....

GGGG

Quote from: Lennys Tap on January 11, 2017, 10:55:04 PM
I agree with everything in your post, Mike. Our guys were true Warriors for most of the game and all of the OT. I'm ecstatic we won this game.

But if you're not at least a little concerned about a near epic collapse down the stretch (our second in 10 days) you're not being realistic.


I'm not concerned.  Their senior guard hit huge shots down the stretch, and our sophomore 83% FT shooter who played the entire game missed a couple.  They gave up a crap load of offensive rebounds, but the team is getting bigger.

Here is what I see.

**A team that plays hard.
**A team that gave up the lead, with two starters on the bench, and still managed to pull out a win.  Two players who were bad at times (JJJ and Katin), stepped up big in OT.
**A team that has improved defensively.
**A team that can score.

If people can't tell there is progress, they are blind.

MUfan12

Quote from: Dr. Vinnie Boombatz on January 12, 2017, 08:44:27 AM
If people can't tell there is progress, they are blind.

Agreed. They should be 2-0 against a team that destroyed them twice last season.

Toughness has been a criticism of mine the past two years, but they really showed it last night. Here's hoping they build off it.

rocket surgeon

Quote from: NCMUFan on January 11, 2017, 09:20:44 PM
Is PFsHeroes32 Chico?

derangement much?
                                              FREE the real chicos!

btw, how would chicos jump in under another name with only or already have 5400-something posts?  he had over 20,000 when he was kicked off-even teal next time would be lame
felz Houston ate uncle boozie's hands

MU82

Quote from: Dr. Vinnie Boombatz on January 12, 2017, 08:44:27 AM

Here is what I see.

**A team that plays hard.
**A team that gave up the lead, with two starters on the bench, and still managed to pull out a win.  Two players who were bad at times (JJJ and Katin), stepped up big in OT.
**A team that has improved defensively.
**A team that can score.

If people can't tell there is progress, they are blind.

Perfectly stated, Sultan.

Only those who like to criticize everything and prefer negativity can look at the trajectory of this team and think it is going downhill.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

Loose Cannon

Quote from: PFsHeroes32 on January 12, 2017, 08:41:15 AM
Great, Wojo will be dissecting it too. Win by 30 or lose by 30 it's part of sports.

You're Absolutely Right, and hope you have a nice Day.
" Love is Space and Time measured by the Heart. "  M Proust

cheebs09

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on January 11, 2017, 11:41:51 PM
This I can get behind. If Katin had a clear path to the hoop than he should have done that instead of taking the three. Always look for the highest % shot.

My biggest issue was he hesitated. When he double pumped, he should have pulled it out. I don't think Seton Hall was going to foul intentionally and I feel we have a problem getting a good look when winding the clock down. We also seem more likely to turn it over.

Just my opinion. I can definitely see those who say it was an awful decision.

MUWarrior4Life

Quote from: Class71 on January 11, 2017, 08:50:37 PM
No need to defend a win against a very physical team and officials that are delusional.
Ditto

brewcity77

Quote from: cheebs09 on January 12, 2017, 09:10:38 AMMy biggest issue was he hesitated. When he double pumped, he should have pulled it out.

It was one of those cases of being too open. I don't know why it is, but when guys get an eternity to shoot and have time to think about it, those shots more often than not seem to be off the mark. SHU had one of those late in the game last night too that rimmed out.

GGGG

Quote from: rocket surgeon on January 12, 2017, 08:51:33 AM
derangement much?
                                              FREE the real chicos!

btw, how would chicos jump in under another name with only or already have 5400-something posts?  he had over 20,000 when he was kicked off-even teal next time would be lame


1. It was a joke.
2. Your incessant need to defend Chicos is strange.

tower912

Luke 6:45   ...A good man produces goodness from the good in his heart; an evil man produces evil out of his store of evil.   Each man speaks from his heart's abundance...

It is better to be fearless and cheerful than cheerless and fearful.

manny31

Quote from: MU82 on January 12, 2017, 08:52:31 AM
Perfectly stated, Sultan.

Only those who like to criticize everything and prefer negativity can look at the trajectory of this team and think it is going downhill.

+1 The guys played tougher. Showed mental toughness and I hope that they are figuring out the intensity that will be needed to close out and wins games. MU isn't the most talented team(yet) and this type of intensity/toughness will necessary to win games that are anyone's ball game at the end of the game. I have bitched a lot about a lack of toughness but even if the lost last night I wouldn't have bitched about a lack of toughness. Next couple of games could be very telling, see if MU can continue to maintain the intensity it needs to finish in the 5 spot in the BEast and get sneaky dangerous 10 seed.

AverageJoe

Can someone tell me why JJ was replaced by Duane at the end of regulation?  Duane can't hit a jump shot to save his life.  It doesn't go into OT if JJ plays.  Furthermore, if Duane played in OT instead of JJ, we lose the game.

Previous topic - Next topic