Main Menu
collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Congrats to Royce by cheebs09
[May 21, 2025, 08:35:29 PM]


More conference realignment talk by WhiteTrash
[May 21, 2025, 02:05:42 PM]


Scouting Report: Ian Miletic by mug644
[May 20, 2025, 06:40:19 PM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by MuggsyB
[May 20, 2025, 06:27:04 PM]


NM by marqfan22
[May 20, 2025, 05:53:46 PM]


Marquette vs Oklahoma by dgies9156
[May 20, 2025, 12:25:50 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75


PGsHeroes32

Lazar picking up where the BIG 3 left off....

wadesworld

Would love it but don't see it.  If only we had saved the $9M we just ave to Delly...


4everwarriors

Fookin' Bloomin'ton has a better chance of signin' Wade dan da Dears.
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

Herman Cain

Quote from: 4everwarriors on July 01, 2016, 07:02:36 PM
Fookin' Bloomin'ton has a better chance of signin' Wade dan da Dears.
It would be good for MU if the Bucks sign Wade. Puts us in closer proximity to Zaire.
"It was a Great Day until it wasn't"
    ——Rory McIlroy on Final Round at Pinehurst

jonny09

Milwaukee getting clowned by Wade.  Don't fall for it.  Did this same exact thing before the big 3. 


naginiF

Quote from: Marquette Fan In NY on July 01, 2016, 07:14:46 PM
It would be good for MU if the Bucks sign Wade. Puts us in closer proximity to Zaire.
#thenextkostas

GGGG

Quote from: jonny09 on July 01, 2016, 08:38:14 PM
Milwaukee getting clowned by Wade.  Don't fall for it.  Did this same exact thing before the big 3. 


So they shouldn't negotiate with free agents even if it means driving up the price for him to go elsewhere?

SaveOD238

At $20 million/year Wade is absolutely NOT worth it for the Bucks.  The sentimental homecoming and superstar shine will wear off real fast when everyone realizes that he is not the player he once was.  $20M a year to an aging star would be classic Bucks, and it would keep them from being competitive long term.

FWIW I'm a post-Wade MU fan, so I don't have the emotional ties to his career here that many of you all do.  So I guess the question to y'all is... Would you buy more Bucks tickets if Wade was in green and cream?

LloydsLegs

Rumors are that the Bulls and Wade are talking too.  Bulls been played before.

MuMark

#12
Quote from: SaveOD238 on July 01, 2016, 09:49:10 PM
At $20 million/year Wade is absolutely NOT worth it for the Bucks.  The sentimental homecoming and superstar shine will wear off real fast when everyone realizes that he is not the player he once was.  $20M a year to an aging star would be classic Bucks, and it would keep them from being competitive long term.

FWIW I'm a post-Wade MU fan, so I don't have the emotional ties to his career here that many of you all do.  So I guess the question to y'all is... Would you buy more Bucks tickets if Wade was in green and cream?

1 yes I would buy more tickets
2 20 million to Wade would not stop,the Bucks from competing
3 20 million now is not what it was 3, 5 or 10 years ago...http://www.foxsports.com/nba/story/nba-salary-cap-2016-17-94-million-increase-of-34-percent-061816

Ps Kent friggin Bazemore just got 70 million over 4 years
https://twitter.com/sbnationnba/status/749072918412271616

GGGG

The salary cap next year is $94 million.  Ten years ago it was $53 M.  Five years ago it was $58 M.

$20 million isn't the hit it used to be.

GB Warrior

This is a courtesy for both sides. Bucks get credibility by nabbing a meeting with a star; Wade gets leverage from having more teams appear to be in the running.

Would be cool to see Wade back in Milwaukee, but with Wade being a ball dominant shooter, hard to see how this fits into the Bucks strategic vision in the short or long term

SaveOD238

$20 million is still more than a fifth of the team's budget.  Right now, with just Middleton and Monore getting big money, Delly and Teletovic getting decent contracts (Delly's is almost $10 million), and Parker/Giannis on cheap rookie deals, $20 million seems affordable.  But when Parker and Giannis are due for their extensions and raises, having $20 million tied up in an aging superstar with bad knees could cause one or both to bolt if the Bucks don't have the room to afford them.  If it was one or two years at $20 million, I think Wade is a smart move.  Four or five seems like a big risk.

MU82

Delly is a mediocre (at best) NBA player. If there is any chance to have gotten Wade or another far superior player, spending that kind of scratch on Delly is highly questionable.

As for Wade -- if the Bucks really have a chance to get him (which is not super likely), you pay a premium for him if you think he makes your team better in multiple ways.

Those ways:

1. You determine he can still play. He sure looked good most of this past season, including the playoffs. Can he keep playing at a high level for another 2, 3, 4 years?

2. You determine he will be a good mentor to the young players on your roster.

3. You determine he does not have to have the ball all the time. I hear this criticism, but he certainly didn't have the ball all the time when LeBron and even Chalmers were teammates.

If your assessment in those areas says "yes," and if he actually wants to play for you, Wade is a winner and a Hall of Famer with some gas left in the tank.

Those assessments go for teams other than the Bucks, too. Wade probably is most valuable to the Heat, and the Heat also can pay him the most. So it's still difficult to imagine him going elsewhere, but stuff happens.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

Herman Cain

Quote from: MU82 on July 02, 2016, 03:24:23 PM
Delly is a mediocre (at best) NBA player. If there is any chance to have gotten Wade or another far superior player, spending that kind of scratch on Delly is highly questionable.

As for Wade -- if the Bucks really have a chance to get him (which is not super likely), you pay a premium for him if you think he makes your team better in multiple ways.

Those ways:

1. You determine he can still play. He sure looked good most of this past season, including the playoffs. Can he keep playing at a high level for another 2, 3, 4 years?

2. You determine he will be a good mentor to the young players on your roster.

3. You determine he does not have to have the ball all the time. I hear this criticism, but he certainly didn't have the ball all the time when LeBron and even Chalmers were teammates.

If your assessment in those areas says "yes," and if he actually wants to play for you, Wade is a winner and a Hall of Famer with some gas left in the tank.

Those assessments go for teams other than the Bucks, too. Wade probably is most valuable to the Heat, and the Heat also can pay him the most. So it's still difficult to imagine him going elsewhere, but stuff happens.
I agree with this analysis.
"It was a Great Day until it wasn't"
    ——Rory McIlroy on Final Round at Pinehurst

brandx

Quote from: SaveOD238 on July 01, 2016, 09:49:10 PM
At $20 million/year Wade is absolutely NOT worth it for the Bucks.  The sentimental homecoming and superstar shine will wear off real fast when everyone realizes that he is not the player he once was.  $20M a year to an aging star would be classic Bucks, and it would keep them from being competitive long term.

FWIW I'm a post-Wade MU fan, so I don't have the emotional ties to his career here that many of you all do.  So I guess the question to y'all is... Would you buy more Bucks tickets if Wade was in green and cream?

In today's climate, it is a bargain. Sure beats Noah or Bazemore for $17+ mil.

Benny B

Has Wade finished his degree yet?  Is that even any consideration whatsoever?
Quote from: LittleMurs on January 08, 2015, 07:10:33 PM
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny.  Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.

GooooMarquette

Quote from: GB Warrior on July 02, 2016, 12:39:02 PM

This is a courtesy for both sides. Bucks get credibility by nabbing a meeting with a star; Wade gets leverage from having more teams appear to be in the running.


If we assume you're right that it's a courtesy to give Wade leverage...if you see it, the NBA GMs surely see it too.

So much for leverage....

Herman Cain

Nuggets will make D Wade a very attractive offer. They will give him more years and more money than the Heat.  There is a real possibility he takes their proposal.
"It was a Great Day until it wasn't"
    ——Rory McIlroy on Final Round at Pinehurst

wadesworld

Quote from: Marquette Fan In NY on July 04, 2016, 09:54:58 AM
Nuggets will make D Wade a very attractive offer. They will give him more years and more money than the Heat.  There is a real possibility he takes their proposal.

There is no chance.  The Heat will now give Wade what he wants, and if the Heat had spent their money on Durant Wade would've gone back there to win another Championship.  He was never leaving, just a matter of time.

Big tuna

Dwyane Wade averaged 24 points per game last season. While he may not be the "player he once was" he is still a damn good player and better than most guards in the league. Dude can still ball.

wadesworld

Quote from: Big tuna on July 04, 2016, 11:39:14 AM
Dwyane Wade averaged 24 points per game last season. While he may not be the "player he once was" he is still a damn good player and better than most guards in the league. Dude can still ball.

No he didn't.

Previous topic - Next topic