Main Menu
collapse

Resources

Stud of Albany Game

Chase Ross

15 points, 4 rebounds,
5 assists, 5 steals,
26 minutes

2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Jagging off by MU82
[Today at 12:55:12 AM]


Jaguars are Evil by pbiflyer
[November 05, 2025, 11:17:10 PM]


Jaguars SOTG by MarquetteMike1977
[November 05, 2025, 10:59:15 PM]


Ross & ZL by MuggsyB
[November 05, 2025, 10:58:34 PM]


Recruiting as of 9/15/25 by Scoop Snoop
[November 05, 2025, 10:08:00 PM]


MU's Team Speed by Scoop Snoop
[November 05, 2025, 10:00:59 PM]


Game day 2 by mileskishnish72
[November 05, 2025, 09:36:47 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Southern

Marquette
80
Marquette vs.
Southern
Date/Time: Nov 5, 2025, 7:00pm
TV: ESPN+
Schedule for 2025-26
Albany
53

TheTulsaWarrior

I have spent a lot of years in marketing.  You always look for the unique features that you can maximize.  Marquette has NBA city, Big East/major markets and basketball first as elements that can be used effectively.  I generally agree with Chico on the advantages HE had being showcased at Marquette.

kryza

Ellenson benefited a lot more than MU did. Everyone is asking what advantage Ellenson got, but how about MU? We all thought nabbing Ellenson would at least mean a NIT. But we ended up with nothing. We'll get another MU player in the NBA, but that's pretty much it. Not the greatest benefit when we could've used the scholly on a 4 year player that would've developed all last year to help up this year.

We actually lost two scholarships because we needed to get Wally as well. That's two players we could've potentially gotten and developed these last two years.

keefe

Quote from: TheTulsaWarrior on April 23, 2016, 11:41:03 AM
I have spent a lot of years in marketing.  You always look for the unique features that you can maximize.  Marquette has NBA city, Big East/major markets and basketball first as elements that can be used effectively.  I generally agree with Chico on the advantages HE had being showcased at Marquette.

I agree that Marquette accrues some marginal ancillary benefit from having the Bucks in town. But that has nothing to do with the USP of Marquette Basketball.

If Marquette's value prop hinges on a notional, proximity-based association with a directionally connected affinity group then the University's investment in men's basketball has been an abysmal failure.

By your logic, UWM, Fordham, Tufts, Cleveland State, Detroit Mercy, et al would realize similar benefits.

I have listened to Dodds overhype the Bucks connection and his punctuated posts have confirmed only that he doesn't understand how vesting value in a brand should never aspire to "me too."


Death on call

Frenns Liquor Depot

Quote from: kryza on April 23, 2016, 11:47:27 AM
Ellenson benefited a lot more than MU did. Everyone is asking what advantage Ellenson got, but how about MU? We all thought nabbing Ellenson would at least mean a NIT. But we ended up with nothing. We'll get another MU player in the NBA, but that's pretty much it. Not the greatest benefit when we could've used the scholly on a 4 year player that would've developed all last year to help up this year.

We actually lost two scholarships because we needed to get Wally as well. That's two players we could've potentially gotten and developed these last two years.

From a benefit within the season standpoint I agree.  The benefit to the program and Wojo for landing him and getting him to the NBA is not an inconsequential benefit in recruiting.

GGGG

There are some ancillary benefits of being in an NBA city.  Henry didn't receive any benefit from being in an NBA city.  Scouts go everywhere.  Every game is on television. 

We R Final Four

Quote from: kryza on April 23, 2016, 11:47:27 AM
Ellenson benefited a lot more than MU did. Everyone is asking what advantage Ellenson got, but how about MU? We all thought nabbing Ellenson would at least mean a NIT. But we ended up with nothing. We'll get another MU player in the NBA, but that's pretty much it. Not the greatest benefit when we could've used the scholly on a 4 year player that would've developed all last year to help up this year.

We actually lost two scholarships because we needed to get Wally as well. That's two players we could've potentially gotten and developed these last two years.

I just had this discussion the other day.  I agree with you, however when you get the chance to grab a McDonalds AA you do it.

Previous topic - Next topic