collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: Georgetown thoughts  (Read 20374 times)

jsglow

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 7378
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #100 on: March 02, 2016, 01:32:54 PM »
My Georgetown thoughts are "what's going on over there? " They can't be too happy with JTIII

Got that right.  Where's our Hoya friend who predicted like a #3 seed?

warriorchick

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8086
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #101 on: March 02, 2016, 01:35:17 PM »
Got that right.  Where's our Hoya friend who predicted like a #3 seed?

He hasn't posted because he is having trouble figuring out how to change his username from "Hoya Since Birth" to "Hoya Until Last Night".
Have some patience, FFS.

keefe

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8331
  • "Death From Above"
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #102 on: March 02, 2016, 01:38:58 PM »
Unlike most of you from the sounds of it, the way your son approaches the game is how I handled my basketball viewing while I was at MU.  One or two before the game and saved the serious drinking for after the game on weekends and maybe not all when there were classes school was the next day, depending on my mood.  There were plenty of opportunities to hoist a few at MU, but I liked to pay attention to the game.

Back in the day we stopped at the Lanche to get things going. On the way out we each grabbed a six of PBR for $1.45. Those down jackets and Army field jackets were the perfect conveyance for getting beverages into the Arena. 


Death on call

MUBBau

  • Team Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 396
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #103 on: March 02, 2016, 01:45:22 PM »
My only thought: Down 1 with 5 seconds left, doable.

jsglow

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 7378
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #104 on: March 02, 2016, 01:49:48 PM »
My only thought: Down 1 with 5 seconds left, doable.

I said the same to chick as they checked the clock and added a couple tenths.  Must say, DSM was money on that midrange J.

BM1090

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5861
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #105 on: March 02, 2016, 01:58:10 PM »
Unlike most of you from the sounds of it, the way your son approaches the game is how I handled my basketball viewing while I was at MU.  One or two before the game and saved the serious drinking for after the game on weekends and maybe not all when there were classes school was the next day, depending on my mood.  There were plenty of opportunities to hoist a few at MU, but I liked to pay attention to the game.

I'm with you. Some games (non-con, this saturday against Nova) I had a few drinks at the bars near the arena prior to the game. Rarely if ever buy a beer inside the BC. Plenty of time to drink after the games on the weekends.

Marcus92

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2513
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #106 on: March 02, 2016, 02:04:28 PM »
I thought all the made up promotions (Faculty of the game, Season Ticket holder of the game) takes the wind out of the crowds sails. 

Thoughts?

Agree with this 100%. Most if not all timeouts seem dedicated to promoting something or other — rather than keeping the crowd amped up and into the game.

I couldn't care less which row gets Palermos pizza, who gets a t-shirt on a parachute sponsored by Aurora Health Care, which fan wins QDoba for making a layup, who's on the Delta Dental smile cam, where the Direct Supply VIP seats are, or even whether the golf team just won the Big East tournament.

I've also noticed that there's really no more crowd participation cheers. Used to hear the classic slowly accelerating clap effect through the PA several times a game — more often down the stretch in a close contest. Haven't heard it once all year. I could take or leave the cheerleaders. But these days they don't even have megaphones on the sidelines; the emphasis is on gymnastics rather than what cheerleading is all about (presumably leading fans in cheers, if the name means anything).

Granted, revenue matters. The entire basketball program helps raise money for and draw attention to the university. And I know some fans look forward to breaks in the action, to go get a beer or make a restroom stop. But it seems like timeouts at the BMO Harris Bradley Center (brought to you by WE Energies and about 50 other sponsors) have become complete momentum killers.

All of that takes away from my enjoyment of the game, and the game atmosphere. Marquette is essentially trading some hard-to-quantify part of the fan experience and home court advantage (which helps you win more games and attract even more fans) for the opportunity to attract more sponsorship dollars. That's not without its downside.
« Last Edit: March 02, 2016, 02:12:07 PM by Marcus92 »
"Let's get a green drink!" Famous last words

ChitownSpaceForRent

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6315
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #107 on: March 02, 2016, 02:09:36 PM »
Funny, I never even considered drinking before or during a game, that's just me though. My beverage of choice was an extra large coffee from the dunkin donuts on wisconsin ave on my way to the Bradley Center. I always found the obnoxiously drunk students, well, obnoxious.

Benny B

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5969
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #108 on: March 02, 2016, 03:29:18 PM »
Agree with this 100%. Most if not all timeouts seem dedicated to promoting something or other — rather than keeping the crowd amped up and into the game.

I couldn't care less which row gets Palermos pizza, who gets a t-shirt on a parachute sponsored by Aurora Health Care, which fan wins QDoba for making a layup, who's on the Delta Dental smile cam, where the Direct Supply VIP seats are, or even whether the golf team just won the Big East tournament.

I've also noticed that there's really no more crowd participation cheers. Used to hear the classic slowly accelerating clap effect through the PA several times a game — more often down the stretch in a close contest. Haven't heard it once all year. I could take or leave the cheerleaders. But these days they don't even have megaphones on the sidelines; the emphasis is on gymnastics rather than what cheerleading is all about (presumably leading fans in cheers, if the name means anything).

Granted, revenue matters. The entire basketball program helps raise money for and draw attention to the university. And I know some fans look forward to breaks in the action, to go get a beer or make a restroom stop. But it seems like timeouts at the BMO Harris Bradley Center (brought to you by WE Energies and about 50 other sponsors) have become complete momentum killers.

All of that takes away from my enjoyment of the game, and the game atmosphere. Marquette is essentially trading some hard-to-quantify part of the fan experience and home court advantage (which helps you win more games and attract even more fans) for the opportunity to attract more sponsorship dollars. That's not without its downside.

No promotions, no t-shirt tosses, no parachutes, no pizza, no fans on the jumbotron, no congratulations.... so in other words, during timeouts, MU should do.... nothing?
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny.  Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.

We R Final Four

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 6618
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #109 on: March 02, 2016, 03:36:06 PM »
No promotions, no t-shirt tosses, no parachutes, no pizza, no fans on the jumbotron, no congratulations.... so in other words, during timeouts, MU should do.... nothing?

They could congratulate Chitown for being sober!

MerrittsMustache

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4676
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #110 on: March 02, 2016, 03:42:52 PM »
I couldn't care less which row gets Palermos pizza, who gets a t-shirt on a parachute sponsored by Aurora Health Care, which fan wins QDoba for making a layup, who's on the Delta Dental smile cam, where the Direct Supply VIP seats are, or even whether the golf team just won the Big East tournament.

The fact that you were just able to rattle off all of those MU basketball sponsors is the exact reason why MU gets money from all of those basketball sponsors.

You forgot David Gruber though!


Marcus92

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2513
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #111 on: March 02, 2016, 03:45:44 PM »
No promotions, no t-shirt tosses, no parachutes, no pizza, no fans on the jumbotron, no congratulations.... so in other words, during timeouts, MU should do.... nothing?

That's not my point. Like I mentioned, I know revenue is important and Marquette uses basketball to promote many things. Just seems like the balance has gone completely toward promotion/sponsorship — versus any "play cool music, start a chant, etc."

Am I the only one who remembers the crowd keeping it rocking throughout a visitor's timeout late in the game thanks to the scoreboard "Make Noise!" meter or something else designed for no other purpose than to fire everybody up?

I will say there are a couple player videos encouraging the crowd to get into the game. Just not enough of this kind of thing, in my opinion — especially late in a close game.
"Let's get a green drink!" Famous last words

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #112 on: March 02, 2016, 03:53:11 PM »
Agree with this 100%. Most if not all timeouts seem dedicated to promoting something or other — rather than keeping the crowd amped up and into the game.

I couldn't care less which row gets Palermos pizza, who gets a t-shirt on a parachute sponsored by Aurora Health Care, which fan wins QDoba for making a layup, who's on the Delta Dental smile cam, where the Direct Supply VIP seats are, or even whether the golf team just won the Big East tournament.

I've also noticed that there's really no more crowd participation cheers. Used to hear the classic slowly accelerating clap effect through the PA several times a game — more often down the stretch in a close contest. Haven't heard it once all year. I could take or leave the cheerleaders. But these days they don't even have megaphones on the sidelines; the emphasis is on gymnastics rather than what cheerleading is all about (presumably leading fans in cheers, if the name means anything).

Granted, revenue matters. The entire basketball program helps raise money for and draw attention to the university. And I know some fans look forward to breaks in the action, to go get a beer or make a restroom stop. But it seems like timeouts at the BMO Harris Bradley Center (brought to you by WE Energies and about 50 other sponsors) have become complete momentum killers.

All of that takes away from my enjoyment of the game, and the game atmosphere. Marquette is essentially trading some hard-to-quantify part of the fan experience and home court advantage (which helps you win more games and attract even more fans) for the opportunity to attract more sponsorship dollars. That's not without its downside.


My guess is that those sponsorship dollars are well into six figures.  It isn't inconsequential. 

Marcus92

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2513
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #113 on: March 02, 2016, 03:54:48 PM »
The fact that you were just able to rattle off all of those MU basketball sponsors is the exact reason why MU gets money from all of those basketball sponsors.

You forgot David Gruber though!

I know why it happens. I work in advertising, and I've had season tickets long enough to virtually memorize every single Marquette sponsor.

It's a question of priority. If it was important to Duke, I'm sure they could easily raise the money to demolish their quaint, outdated stadium and replace it with a 25,000-seat modern arena (complete with luxury boxes and naming rights going to the highest bidder). But I believe Coach K and the athletic department recognize that there's value in having one of the most intimidating home courts in college basketball. That the Cameron Crazies are worth something to the basketball program and the school.

Lately, MU seems more interested in pushing promotions/sponsorships than doing whatever is possible to create an awesome, unforgettable environment for college basketball.
"Let's get a green drink!" Famous last words

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #114 on: March 02, 2016, 03:58:48 PM »
I know why it happens. I work in advertising, and I've had season tickets long enough to virtually memorize every single Marquette sponsor.

It's a question of priority. If it was important to Duke, I'm sure they could easily raise the money to demolish their quaint, outdated stadium and replace it with a 25,000-seat modern arena (complete with luxury boxes and naming rights going to the highest bidder). But I believe Coach K and the athletic department recognize that there's value in having one of the most intimidating home courts in college basketball. That the Cameron Crazies are worth something to the basketball program and the school.


Have you been to Cameron during a game?  Do you know if they do something similar?

Lighthouse 84

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2982
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #115 on: March 02, 2016, 04:12:13 PM »
Got that right.  Where's our Hoya friend who predicted like a #3 seed?

He hasn't posted because he is having trouble figuring out how to change his username from "Hoya Since Birth" to "Hoya Until Last Night".
I like how you and Glow carry on conversations on Scoop. In person conversations get so mundane, hey?
HILLTOP SENIOR SURVEY from 1984 Yearbook: 
Favorite Drinking Establishment:

1. The Avalanche.              7. Major Goolsby's.
2. The Gym.                      8. Park Avenue.
3. The Ardmore.                 9. Mugrack.
4. O'Donohues.                 10. Lighthouse.
5. O'Pagets.
6. Hagerty's.

MerrittsMustache

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4676
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #116 on: March 02, 2016, 04:13:18 PM »
I know why it happens. I work in advertising, and I've had season tickets long enough to virtually memorize every single Marquette sponsor.

It's a question of priority. If it was important to Duke, I'm sure they could easily raise the money to demolish their quaint, outdated stadium and replace it with a 25,000-seat modern arena (complete with luxury boxes and naming rights going to the highest bidder). But I believe Coach K and the athletic department recognize that there's value in having one of the most intimidating home courts in college basketball. That the Cameron Crazies are worth something to the basketball program and the school.

Lately, MU seems more interested in pushing promotions/sponsorships than doing whatever is possible to create an awesome, unforgettable environment for college basketball.

You work in advertising and you think that MU should turn down six-figure deals with sponsors in order to play a couple extra minutes of Jock Jams?


warriorchick

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8086
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #117 on: March 02, 2016, 04:14:14 PM »
The fact that you were just able to rattle off all of those MU basketball sponsors is the exact reason why MU gets money from all of those basketball sponsors.

You forgot David Gruber though!

I am just pissed that Glow and I are in the T-shirt Dead Zone.  We are too high up for the cheerleader tosses (you'd think some of the dudes would really whip them up here to show how manly they really are), and the parachutes fall on either side of our section.
Have some patience, FFS.

Marcus92

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2513
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #118 on: March 02, 2016, 04:14:19 PM »
I haven't been to a game at Cameron, so maybe I shouldn't have used that as an example. (Was thinking more about why one of the great programs in college basketball would intentionally keep a completely out-of-date arena that holds fewer than 10,000 fans.)

I saw an article in Forbes earlier this year that addresses the less-tangible value Cameron provides to Duke University:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/marcedelman/2016/01/19/the-charm-of-dukes-cameron-indoor-stadium-is-that-it-still-feels-like-a-college-basketball-arena/#76bf22892f73

A few excerpts:

Perhaps Duke University loses some money each year by not expanding Cameron Indoor Stadium to include luxurious press boxes and only allowing for the smallest of advertisements on the scoreboards and around the stadium.  But in doing so, Duke University has enhanced the brand equity of its basketball team, arena, and school in a way that few other universities have via their athletic programs.

The irony of all this is that big-time college sports programs throughout the country are blaming their elite athletes’ demands for compensation as being the act of commercialism that would purportedly destroy big-time college sports.  But all along, most major universities have been commercializing their own arenas and subjecting student seating to the back of their stadium – causing the very atmosphere that they now claim to fear.

A Duke basketball game at Cameron Indoor Stadium still feels like a college basketball game for fans.  Whereas most top athletic programs have abandoned collegiality in favor of commercialism, Duke’s Cameron Indoor Stadium keeps just a little more of the former reverberating within its walls.
« Last Edit: March 02, 2016, 04:19:04 PM by Marcus92 »
"Let's get a green drink!" Famous last words

warriorchick

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8086
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #119 on: March 02, 2016, 04:15:22 PM »
I like how you and Glow carry on conversations on Scoop. In person conversations get so mundane, hey?

Well seeing as during the day we are 40 miles apart....
Have some patience, FFS.

Marcus92

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2513
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #120 on: March 02, 2016, 04:18:18 PM »
You work in advertising and you think that MU should turn down six-figure deals with sponsors in order to play a couple extra minutes of Jock Jams?

Only pointing out that sponsorships aren't the only thing that provide value to a basketball program — so do the fans. Take a look at the Forbes article I posted the link for. Anyone who's a fan of college basketball knows that money is a huge part of the game. But it all begins and ends with the fan experience. Without them, you don't have any eyeballs for sponsorships, and the six-figure deals will dry up.
"Let's get a green drink!" Famous last words

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #121 on: March 02, 2016, 04:25:59 PM »
I haven't been to a game at Cameron, so maybe I shouldn't have used that as an example. (Was thinking more about why one of the great programs in college basketball would intentionally keep a completely out-of-date arena that holds fewer than 10,000 fans.)

I saw an article in Forbes earlier this year that addresses the less-tangible value
Cameron provides to Duke University:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/marcedelman/2016/01/19/the-charm-of-dukes-cameron-indoor-stadium-is-that-it-still-feels-like-a-college-basketball-arena/#76bf22892f73

A few excerpts:

Perhaps Duke University loses some money each year by not expanding Cameron Indoor Stadium to include luxurious press boxes and only allowing for the smallest of advertisements on the scoreboards and around the stadium.  But in doing so, Duke University has enhanced the brand equity of its basketball team, arena, and school in a way that few other universities have via their athletic programs.

The irony of all this is that big-time college sports programs throughout the country are blaming their elite athletes’ demands for compensation as being the act of commercialism that would purportedly destroy big-time college sports.  But all along, most major universities have been commercializing their own arenas and subjecting student seating to the back of their stadium – causing the very atmosphere that they now claim to fear.

A Duke basketball game at Cameron Indoor Stadium still feels like a college basketball game for fans.  Whereas most top athletic programs have abandoned collegiality in favor of commercialism, Duke’s Cameron Indoor Stadium keeps just a little more of the former reverberating within its walls.

Well thanks for that.  My guess is that you are right.  They don't have parachutes falling from the ceiling and the like.


Only pointing out that sponsorships aren't the only thing that provide value to a basketball program — so do the fans. Take a look at the Forbes article I posted the link for. Anyone who's a fan of college basketball knows that money is a huge part of the game. But it all begins and ends with the fan experience. Without them, you don't have any eyeballs for sponsorships, and the six-figure deals will dry up.

But Marquette isn't Duke.  My guess is that Duke can afford to forgo scholarship money because they have other sources of income.  (Especially donor income.)  Similar to Notre Dame football.

naginiF

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1452
  • 'and the riot be the rhyme of the unheard'
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #122 on: March 02, 2016, 04:37:01 PM »
Well thanks for that.  My guess is that you are right.  They don't have parachutes falling from the ceiling and the like.


But Marquette isn't Duke.  My guess is that Duke can afford to forgo scholarship money because they have other sources of income.  (Especially donor income.)  Similar to Notre Dame football.
Spot on.  Duke's endowment is $7.2 Billion - they don't need the extra revenue from Men's BBall.

Herman Cain

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12919
  • 9-9-9
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #123 on: March 02, 2016, 04:46:43 PM »
Agree with this 100%. Most if not all timeouts seem dedicated to promoting something or other — rather than keeping the crowd amped up and into the game.

I couldn't care less which row gets Palermos pizza, who gets a t-shirt on a parachute sponsored by Aurora Health Care, which fan wins QDoba for making a layup, who's on the Delta Dental smile cam, where the Direct Supply VIP seats are, or even whether the golf team just won the Big East tournament.

I've also noticed that there's really no more crowd participation cheers. Used to hear the classic slowly accelerating clap effect through the PA several times a game — more often down the stretch in a close contest. Haven't heard it once all year. I could take or leave the cheerleaders. But these days they don't even have megaphones on the sidelines; the emphasis is on gymnastics rather than what cheerleading is all about (presumably leading fans in cheers, if the name means anything).

Granted, revenue matters. The entire basketball program helps raise money for and draw attention to the university. And I know some fans look forward to breaks in the action, to go get a beer or make a restroom stop. But it seems like timeouts at the BMO Harris Bradley Center (brought to you by WE Energies and about 50 other sponsors) have become complete momentum killers.

All of that takes away from my enjoyment of the game, and the game atmosphere. Marquette is essentially trading some hard-to-quantify part of the fan experience and home court advantage (which helps you win more games and attract even more fans) for the opportunity to attract more sponsorship dollars. That's not without its downside.
I think your right about the Cheers. Would like to see some old school crowd based cheers led by cheer leaders. If done right would make a difference.
The only mystery in life is why the Kamikaze Pilots wore helmets...
            ---Al McGuire

Marcus92

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 2513
Re: Georgetown thoughts
« Reply #124 on: March 02, 2016, 04:54:59 PM »
But Marquette isn't Duke.  My guess is that Duke can afford to forgo scholarship money because they have other sources of income.  (Especially donor income.)  Similar to Notre Dame football.

True enough. But Duke wasn't always Duke, one of the great programs in college basketball. Before 1963, the school had just 1 NCAA appearance — no Final Fours, no title games, no championship banners. It was just another private school that barely anyone outside the state of North Carolina recognized.

Their success since then hasn't come by accident. Of course, it helps when you find a Hall of Fame coach and land McDonalds All-Americans year after year. Coaches make great programs, players make great teams.

But having one of the greatest home court environments has been important, as well. If not, I guarantee Duke would have razed Cameron to the ground years ago. Like UNC or Kentucky, Duke could sell out a 20,000-seat arena. But Cameron gives Duke a unique identity and a competitive edge, however slight.

Over the past 25 years, Duke has won more national championships (5) than any other school. That includes Connecticut (4), Kentucky (3), North Carolina (3), Syracuse (1), and Louisville (1). Every single one of those schools has been led by Hall of Fame calibre coaches and landed top recruiting classes. There's no way to prove that Cameron makes the difference. I simply suspect that home court advantage is dramatically underappreciated as a factor in a program's success.
"Let's get a green drink!" Famous last words

 

feedback