#1 Villanova at #5 Xavier

[Mr. Nielsen]

FS1 presents its first ever matchup between two top-five college hoops programs, and the BIG EAST's first top-five meeting in the conference's current configuration, Wednesday night as No. 1 Villanova visits No. 5 Xavier at 6:00 PM CT. FS1 extends its coverage of this big game with an on-site studio presence in Cincinnati and a FOX COLLEGE HOOPS EXTRA postgame show, plus FS1's lead college basketball broadcast duo, the inimitable Gus Johnson and Bill Raftery, call the action.

Coverage begins at 6:00 PM CT as studio host Kevin Burkhardt and analyst Steve Lavin welcome viewers to the Cintas Center before Johnson and Raftery take over from their courtside broadcast location. Burkhardt and Lavin return at halftime and again post-game when they join studio host Rob Stone and analysts Jim Jackson and Casey Jacobsen from Los Angeles for reaction, highlights and in-depth analysis of the BIG EAST and college basketball from around the country until 9:00 PM CT.

[MU82]

Good.

If you can't hype this game, why even bother having the rights?

It's too bad most of the Big East-watching audience will be glued to the MU-Creighton game, though!

[wadesworld]

If Xavier wins this one and they both win out until the BE Tournament Finals, with Nova beating Xavier then, do both these teams get a 1 seed?

I don't see how Xavier would be anywhere but on the 1 line if they win this one tonight (they have a really, really strong resume even before what would then be a win over the #1 team in the country), and I don't see a loss at the #5 team in the country knocking Nova from the #1 overall spot to the 2 line.

[mu03eng]

If Xavier wins this one and they both win out until the BE Tournament Finals, with Nova beating Xavier then, do both these teams get a 1 seed?

I don't see how Xavier would be anywhere but on the 1 line if they win this one tonight (they have a really, really strong resume even before what would then be a win over the #1 team in the country), and I don't see a loss at the #5 team in the country knocking Nova from the #1 overall spot to the 2 line.

I can't see the committee putting two Big East teams on the 1 line. I think the Big East gets a 1 seed and a 2 seed. Too much "Power Conference" bias in the form of ACC, Big 12 and B1G

[RubyWiscy]

A few weeks back CBSSports was airing the DePaul vs. St. John's game. The TV guy was just bashing Nova claiming they didn't deserve more than a 3 seed due to their two OOC losses to Oklahoma and Virginia. He went on and on about how Virginia has gotten so much better since then. It was bad. Clearly not a lot of respect for the Big East. I can't believe they are only rumoring 4 teams to the tournament. My biased view is at least 6, maybe 8.

[Wade for President]

If Xavier wins this one and they both win out until the BE Tournament Finals, with Nova beating Xavier then, do both these teams get a 1 seed?

I don't see how Xavier would be anywhere but on the 1 line if they win this one tonight (they have a really, really strong resume even before what would then be a win over the #1 team in the country), and I don't see a loss at the #5 team in the country knocking Nova from the #1 overall spot to the 2 line.

Lunardi said that a Nova loss tonight drops them from the top overall seed.  He also said that getting two BE teams as 1 seeds could be difficult, but there's a lot of season left to play.

Sooooo bummed this game is on at the same time as our tilt.  Wish there was a way that you could program a channel/network to hide the ticker.

[wadesworld]

Lunardi said that a Nova loss tonight drops them from the top overall seed.  He also said that getting two BE teams as 1 seeds could be difficult, but there's a lot of season left to play.

Sooooo bummed this game is on at the same time as our tilt.  Wish there was a way that you could program a channel/network to hide the ticker.

I would agree with Lunardi that a loss tonight would and should drop Nova from the 1 overall spot, but I don't see how they could possibly drop from 1 overall to 5 or lower based on a loss at a top 5 team.  And I don't see how you could look at Xavier's resume after a win over #1 Nova and say they don't deserve a 1 seed.  They have completely blown out some really good teams.

I can't see the committee putting two Big East teams on the 1 line. I think the Big East gets a 1 seed and a 2 seed. Too much "Power Conference" bias in the form of ACC, Big 12 and B1G

I personally don't think the NCAA has any kind of bias against the Big East.  They put 60% of the conference into the NCAAs last year, including a 1 seed.

[MU82]

Clearly not a lot of respect for the Big East. I can't believe they are only rumoring 4 teams to the tournament. My biased view is at least 6, maybe 8.

Why not all 10?

We're tourney bound, everybody!!!!

[brewcity77]

This year, I really feel the top seeds come down quite a bit to the loss column, simply because it's hard to separate the teams at the top. I think the best case for the league getting two #1 seeds would be for Xavier to win tonight and both teams to win out until Villanova knocks off XU in the BET final.

But as far as claims to #1 seeds, Kansas looks like a rock of late (how do they keep winning titles?). If the UNC/UVA winner on Saturday also wins the ACC Tourney, figure they're a lock. The Big 10 might kill themselves off for the top line, but if Iowa, MSU, or Maryland run the table they'll have a claim as well. Oklahoma looks to have maybe fallen off a bit, but if they regroup and win out, they'll also have about as good a resume as anyone.

The key for both Big East teams is to make it as hard as possible to not take them. Play two more times, split those and don't lose any other games and they'll have a good stake. My guess is Xavier has to win tonight to have a chance. Even if they lose tonight and then win out, my suspicion is the Committee would have them locked into the 2-line prior to the Big East final and not change it with the rationale that 'Nova took two of three between them.

[mu03eng]

I personally don't think the NCAA has any kind of bias against the Big East.  They put 60% of the conference into the NCAAs last year, including a 1 seed.

I don't think they are biased against the Big East per se, but are biased for the ACC, B1G, B12 conference on the top seed lines. I get it, those conference teams (Duke, Kansas, UNC, Michigan State) have produced from the 1 and 2 seed lines whereas the Big East hasn't.

[bradley center bat]

A few weeks back CBSSports was airing the DePaul vs. St. John's game. The TV guy was just bashing Nova claiming they didn't deserve more than a 3 seed due to their two OOC losses to Oklahoma and Virginia. He went on and on about how Virginia has gotten so much better since then. It was bad. Clearly not a lot of respect for the Big East. I can't believe they are only rumoring 4 teams to the tournament. My biased view is at least 6, maybe 8.

That would be Doug Gottlieb.

[brewcity77]

I don't think they are biased against the Big East per se, but are biased for the ACC, B1G, B12 conference on the top seed lines. I get it, those conference teams (Duke, Kansas, UNC, Michigan State) have produced from the 1 and 2 seed lines whereas the Big East hasn't.

I wouldn't disagree, but that shouldn't be the case. What Villanova and Duke did respectively from the 1 line in 2015's tournament, for example, should have absolutely no bearing on where they (or teams from their respective conferences) are seeded in 2016.

[Windyplayer]

That would be Doug Gottlieb.

Doug Gottlieb is a middling talent as a sports broadcaster/analyst who tries to garner more attention by sensationalism rather than merit.

[drewm88]

There's no way Villanova gets a 1 seed after their loss on 2/27.

[mu03eng]

I wouldn't disagree, but that shouldn't be the case. What Villanova and Duke did respectively from the 1 line in 2015's tournament, for example, should have absolutely no bearing on where they (or teams from their respective conferences) are seeded in 2016.

You've got a tense problem    Shouldn't and don't are two different things.

[brewcity77]

You've got a tense problem    Shouldn't and don't are two different things.

Oh, I definitely recognize it. Just don't agree with it

[Aughnanure]

But as far as claims to #1 seeds, Kansas looks like a rock of late (how do they keep winning titles?). If the UNC/UVA winner on Saturday also wins the ACC Tourney, figure they're a lock. The Big 10 might kill themselves off for the top line, but if Iowa, MSU, or Maryland run the table they'll have a claim as well. Oklahoma looks to have maybe fallen off a bit, but if they regroup and win out, they'll also have about as good a resume as anyone.

The Big XII isn't actually that good. And never really has been outside them.

[JamilJaeJamailJrJuan]

The Big XII isn't actually that good. And never really has been outside them.

Gotta disagree here. B12 is very good.

[Henry Sugar]

The Big XII isn't actually that good. And never really has been outside them.

I don't believe the data supports your statement. The B12 has been a very good conference since 2008.

Overall conference rank of the B12 according to Pomeroy:

This year: #1
2015: #1
2014: #2
2013: #6
2012: #2
2011: #3
2010: #1
2009: #2
2008: #1
2007: #6
2006: #6
2005: #4
2004: #4
2003: #1
2002: #5

[JamilJaeJamailJrJuan]

If Xavier wins this one and they both win out until the BE Tournament Finals, with Nova beating Xavier then, do both these teams get a 1 seed?

I think X and Nova should both be one seeds.  I think X is underrated at 5.  They have the won wins and fewest losses amongst major CBB teams. And pass the eye test...that is a team built to win a national title.  They may not have the star power of an Oklahoma or Kansas, but just really really good 1-8.  Depending on matchups, they'll probably be my team this tourney.

That said,  I hope Nova wins tonight.  Cause I want to beat a legit #1 on Saturday. 

[Aughnanure]

I don't believe the data supports your statement. The B12 has been a very good conference since 2008.

Overall conference rank of the B12 according to Pomeroy:

This year: #1
2015: #1
2014: #2
2013: #6
2012: #2
2011: #3
2010: #1
2009: #2
2008: #1
2007: #6
2006: #6
2005: #4
2004: #4
2003: #1
2002: #5

When you repeat 12 straight times as champion, I'm done believing who you're playing is that good. Know who else repeats 12 straight times? Gonzaga in the WCC. It is embarrassing for that conference.

[MU82]

When you repeat 12 straight times as champion, I'm done believing who you're playing is that good.

Yeah, it's like Henry being only an OK rebounder but the ball just keeps falling into his hands.

Lucky Hank, lucky Jayhawks.

[PaintTouches]

Frankly, all that should matter is to get Nova in the Brooklyn --> Philly regional. Being the top No. 1 seed does that, but being the 4th 1 seed might not (depending on if UVA/MD/UNC get a higher 1-seed).

As for X, they would want to get into the Louisville Regional, which is only 100 miles away from campus, with the seed mattering a bit less as lots of teams are in play for the Yum Center.

Going off that, I'll probably root for Nova.

[KampusFoods]

Yeah, it's like Henry being only an OK rebounder but the ball just keeps falling into his hands.

Lucky Hank, lucky Jayhawks.

If the scoop meme contest continues, I'm voting "Henry's lucky rebounds" to the final

[Aughnanure]

Yeah, it's like Henry being only an OK rebounder but the ball just keeps falling into his hands.

Lucky Hank, lucky Jayhawks.

Not saying the Jayhawks are lucky, just sick of people lauding the conference I grew up with ignoring this freaking huge problem. It shouldn't be something to be proud of, it's actually kind of embarrassing. Growing up in Kansas, KU's NCAA upsets/burnouts become a really big deal and I have always argued a little bit (not huge, its a good conference) of it is that its because they're rarely really challenged during conference play except maybe by Mizzou (rivalry) and then Texas for a few years. So the intensity lacks.

The Big XII is a very good conference, better than the Big East, but when I see that all of their teams that have won more than 4 conference games are predicted to be in the tourney I'm rolling my eyes.