collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by Aircraftcarrier
[Today at 06:49:48 PM]


What is the actual gap between Marquette and the top of the Big East by DoctorV
[Today at 04:47:25 PM]


Scouting Report: Ian Miletic by MU82
[Today at 02:36:17 PM]


2026 Bracketology by MU82
[Today at 02:32:12 PM]


Pearson to MU by MuMark
[Today at 11:11:57 AM]


Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by The Sultan
[Today at 08:41:12 AM]


NM by mu_hilltopper
[May 17, 2025, 03:51:26 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

GGGG

Quote from: jsglow on January 29, 2016, 10:01:22 AM
I hope we land Howard too.  Time will tell.  But this would be a legitimate example of 'recruiting over' the current incumbent.  I have no problem with that.


Isn't "recruiting over" more about getting a commit, and then getting another commit in the same class that plays the same position?


KampusFoods

Quote from: The Sultan of Sunshine on January 29, 2016, 10:53:40 AM

Isn't "recruiting over" more about getting a commit, and then getting another commit in the same class that plays the same position?

That's definitely an example of it, but I also think it applies current players. In this case especially, it seemed as if Carter was tabbed as PG of the future for MU, a title that most fans would willingly give to Howard should he commit.

Windyplayer

Quote from: RKMU123 on January 29, 2016, 11:00:47 AM
That's definitely an example of it, but I also think it applies current players. In this case especially, it seemed as if Carter was tabbed as PG of the future for MU, a title that most fans would willingly give to Howard should he commit.
I think coaches just want competitions at positions. Though the concept of "recruiting over" may cross their minds, I think they would be just as pleased if the incumbent outplayed the commit to keep his position. At the end of the day, in this context, the idea is just a narrative spun more by fans.


KampusFoods

Quote from: Windyplayer on January 29, 2016, 11:15:32 AM
I think coaches just want competitions at positions. Though the concept of "recruiting over" may cross their minds, I think they would be just as pleased if the incumbent outplayed the commit to keep his position. At the end of the day, in this context, the idea is just a narrative spun more by fans.

I agree. And players should be informed enough to know that coaches aren't going to wait another 4 years to recruit their position, so they shouldn't be surprised or put off by it.


ATL MU Warrior

Quote from: RKMU123 on January 29, 2016, 11:00:47 AM
That's definitely an example of it, but I also think it applies current players. In this case especially, it seemed as if Carter was tabbed as PG of the future for MU, a title that most fans would willingly give to Howard should he commit.
What do you expect them to do?  Recruit only players that are worse than the ones we currently have?  Doesn't seem like a particularly strong recipe for success...

Lennys Tap

Quote from: ATL MU Warrior on January 29, 2016, 12:18:46 PM
What do you expect them to do?  Recruit only players that are worse than the ones we currently have?  Doesn't seem like a particularly strong recipe for success...

Bingo. The "future" was now because we had no point guard. Traci had the opportunity to make that position his for the next 4 years. Had he done that Markus Howard wouldn't be our #1 priority. But because we still have a gaping hole at that position, Howard is.

wadesworld

Quote from: Lennys Tap on January 29, 2016, 12:25:08 PM
Bingo. The "future" was now because we had no point guard. Traci had the opportunity to make that position his for the next 4 years. Had he done that Markus Howard wouldn't be our #1 priority. But because we still have a gaping hole at that position, Howard is.

Or Howard's our #1 priority because he is an incredibly talented basketball player who already committed essentially to a coach that is now on our staff, so we're taking advantage of that and trying to get more talent on the team.

If we simply put recruiting priority based solely on needs of the team then a PF would be our #1 priority.

HoopsterBC

Quote from: wadesworld on January 29, 2016, 12:29:31 PM
Or Howard's our #1 priority because he is an incredibly talented basketball player who already committed essentially to a coach that is now on our staff, so we're taking advantage of that and trying to get more talent on the team.

If we simply put recruiting priority based solely on needs of the team then a PF would be our #1 priority.

PF is the #1  priority, but if you feel Howard has given a soft verbal to SJ that is even better.  My concern is that the last 2 recruits possibly came from SJ, what are the
other coaches doing to bring in new talent?

jsglow

Quote from: The Sultan of Sunshine on January 29, 2016, 10:53:40 AM

Isn't "recruiting over" more about getting a commit, and then getting another commit in the same class that plays the same position?

You're probably right.  I guess one year removed is a little more of a stretch.

GGGG

Quote from: HoopsterBC on January 29, 2016, 12:38:33 PM
PF is the #1  priority, but if you feel Howard has given a soft verbal to SJ that is even better.  My concern is that the last 2 recruits possibly came from SJ, what are the
other coaches doing to bring in new talent?


What are you concerned about?  They are recruiting, especially Nelson who did a lot of the work on Cheatham and Carter.

wadesworld

Quote from: HoopsterBC on January 29, 2016, 12:38:33 PM
PF is the #1  priority, but if you feel Howard has given a soft verbal to SJ that is even better.  My concern is that the last 2 recruits possibly came from SJ, what are the
other coaches doing to bring in new talent?

I meant that Howard essentially committed to Stan Johnson when Stan was at ASU last year.  Now Stan is at Marquette and Howard has decommitted from ASU.

Lennys Tap

Quote from: wadesworld on January 29, 2016, 12:29:31 PM
Or Howard's our #1 priority because he is an incredibly talented basketball player who already committed essentially to a coach that is now on our staff, so we're taking advantage of that and trying to get more talent on the team.

If we simply put recruiting priority based solely on needs of the team then a PF would be our #1 priority.

Wades - IMO, right now PG is our #1 priority Carter is our only guy there and is substandard. We have 2 centers and a bunch of 2/3s. PF becomes our #1 priority if/when Henry decides to leave. of course at that point we have 2 scholarships open - one for Howard and one for a PF - and both can be instant starters.

KampusFoods

Quote from: Lennys Tap on January 29, 2016, 01:12:24 PM
Wades - IMO, right now PG is our #1 priority Carter is our only guy there and is substandard. We have 2 centers and a bunch of 2/3s. PF becomes our #1 priority if/when Henry decides to leave. of course at that point we have 2 scholarships open - one for Howard and one for a PF - and both can be instant starters.

Are people still holding out hope that he's staying?

Lennys Tap

Quote from: RKMU123 on January 29, 2016, 01:14:19 PM
Are people still holding out hope that he's staying?

Don't know. My point is that if he goes we have TWO scholarships to give out - one for Howard and one for Henry's replacement.

BM1090

Quote from: Lennys Tap on January 29, 2016, 01:12:24 PM
Wades - IMO, right now PG is our #1 priority Carter is our only guy there and is substandard. We have 2 centers and a bunch of 2/3s. PF becomes our #1 priority if/when Henry decides to leave. of course at that point we have 2 scholarships open - one for Howard and one for a PF - and both can be instant starters.

Agreed. And I think we have a great shot at Howard, and probably less of a chance with Bruno Fernando. But everyone is talking about the logjam we have at guard. I don't see it, really. We have more of a logjam at the wing position.

Do we need another PF for next year? Yes, absolutely. But there should be enough playing time at guard for everyone

PG - Howard(?), Carter, Rowsey
SG - Wilson, Cheatham, Rowsey
SF - Cheatham, Johnson, Cohen, W. Ellenson, Anim
PF - Johnson, Cohen, W. Ellenson, Anim
C - Fischer - Heldt

Unless we get Fernando or a grad transfer 4, I would expect a lot of 4 out 1 in next year

Stretchdeltsig

Surprised at the negativity on this board on Traci Carter.  Heck, he's only a freshman, who plays hard.  Perhaps he plAys too selfishly and should shoot more.  I like him and think with our great coaching, he will be a great Warrior.

MUfan12

Quote from: Stretchdeltsig on January 29, 2016, 01:38:41 PM
Surprised at the negativity on this board on Traci Carter.  Heck, he's only a freshman, who plays hard.  Perhaps he plAys too selfishly and should shoot more.  I like him and think with our great coaching, he will be a great Warrior.

Agreed. His mistakes primarily come from aggression. That's a good thing, he can learn how to reign that in. He's got a decent feel for the game, and plays really hard.

Not all freshmen PGs are Dominic James or Tony Miller. It takes time.

GGGG

Two concerns regarding Carter.  First, he seemingly can't defend without getting in foul trouble.  Second, he can't score.  Derrick had a better FG% last year because he can get to the rim.  Traci just can't seem to score from anywhere.

We R Final Four

Quote from: The Sultan of Sunshine on January 29, 2016, 01:49:26 PM
Two concerns regarding Carter.  First, he seemingly can't defend without getting in foul trouble.  Second, he can't score.  Derrick had a better FG% last year because he can get to the rim.  Traci just can't seem to score from anywhere.

Bingo. He can't defend and he can't score......other than that he's great.

wadesworld

Quote from: We R Final Four on January 29, 2016, 02:40:29 PM
Bingo. He can't defend and he can't score......other than that he's great.

Outside of maybe Sandy he's our best perimeter man to man defender.

Frenns Liquor Depot

Quote from: The Sultan of Sunshine on January 29, 2016, 01:49:26 PM
Two concerns regarding Carter.  First, he seemingly can't defend without getting in foul trouble.  Second, he can't score.  Derrick had a better FG% last year because he can get to the rim.  Traci just can't seem to score from anywhere.

Traci looks the part, but the game is too fast for him right now.  It reminds me of Vander freshman and sophomore year where he knew what to do but could never finish.  Believe me Traci is not ready to be the starting PG - but I dont think I would write him off.

Defense wise he seems very serviceable -- just needs to foul less.

GGGG

Quote from: We R Final Four on January 29, 2016, 02:40:29 PM
Bingo. He can't defend and he can't score......other than that he's great.

But that doesn't mean that he won't be able to improve in either area.  And Frenn's is right.  He is playing too fast and tempo is a problem.


avid1010

Quote from: The Sultan of Sunshine on January 29, 2016, 01:49:26 PM
Two concerns regarding Carter.  First, he seemingly can't defend without getting in foul trouble.  Second, he can't score.  Derrick had a better FG% last year because he can get to the rim.  Traci just can't seem to score from anywhere.
carter has a higher ceiling than d. wilson, imho...so i'm willing to go through some growing pains.  we obviously need another pg on this team...but if carter puts in the work over the summer i think he could take a nice step forward next year. 

nyg

Quote from: MuEagle1090 on January 29, 2016, 01:34:24 PM
Agreed. And I think we have a great shot at Howard, and probably less of a chance with Bruno Fernando. But everyone is talking about the logjam we have at guard. I don't see it, really. We have more of a logjam at the wing position.

Do we need another PF for next year? Yes, absolutely. But there should be enough playing time at guard for everyone

PG - Howard(?), Carter, Rowsey
SG - Wilson, Cheatham, Rowsey
SF - Cheatham, Johnson, Cohen, W. Ellenson, Anim
PF - Johnson, Cohen, W. Ellenson, Anim
C - Fischer - Heldt

Unless we get Fernando or a grad transfer 4, I would expect a lot of 4 out 1 in next year

Can you imagine JJJ and Cohen playing power forward and going up against Reynolds, Copeland, Delgado, Bentil, and the other BE power forwards.  Oh my......

Then when Fischer gets in foul trouble (almost every game) Heldt will come in and get two offensive screens calls within four minutes. 

The team needs a PF after Henry leaves.  I realize the point guard situation is not currently the best, but is it adequate, because the PF position will not be.  With Rowsey's arrival next year, the squad has numerous guards who will be fighting for playing time.  If MU does obtain a commitment from another PG, I would not be shocked if one of the current ones left for being recruited over. Who knows.......

We R Final Four

Quote from: The Sultan of Sunshine on January 29, 2016, 02:50:57 PM
But that doesn't mean that he won't be able to improve in either area.  And Frenn's is right.  He is playing too fast and tempo is a problem.
I agree he CAN improve especially on the offensive--and believe he will. He has very little defensive IQ and those concepts are much more difficult to grasp than an improved jump shot.

Previous topic - Next topic