collapse

* Recent Posts

2024 Transfer Portal by lawdog77
[Today at 05:09:19 AM]


Big East 2024 Offseason by PointWarrior
[Today at 12:57:23 AM]


2024-25 Outlook by PointWarrior
[April 30, 2024, 11:37:53 PM]


Shaka interview by Jay Bee
[April 30, 2024, 09:36:41 PM]


Recruiting as of 3/15/24 by MU82
[April 30, 2024, 04:18:31 PM]


D-I Logo Quiz by IL Warrior
[April 30, 2024, 02:09:27 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!


Author Topic: Why TV ratings in sports are more important than attendance  (Read 853 times)

Tugg Speedman

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8836
Why TV ratings in sports are more important than attendance
« on: November 21, 2015, 09:43:17 AM »
Why TV ratings in sports are more important than attendance
The amount of revenue generated is expected to finally surpass gate receipts in 2018.

http://www.the42.ie/tv-ratings-more-important-than-live-sport-2451415-Nov2015/

THE AMOUNT OF revenue generated by major North American sports team from the selling of media rights (TV, radio, internet, etc.) is projected to surpass the amount of revenue generated from ticket sales in 2018, according to a PricewaterhouseCoopers report.

As a result, television ratings have now become the driving force behind sports, even bigger than actually bringing fans to the games.

This is not to say that ticket sales are not important. They are still a major revenue stream and have a stronger potential impact on the perceived popularity of the team.

That is, the more popular a team appears to be, the more fans they will generate, the more people they will draw to television sets, and the more merchandise they will sell.

Empty stadiums have the opposite affect. Just ask the Tampa Bay Rays, who routinely finish at the bottom in attendance but have strong TV ratings, regularly finishing in the top 15 of all Major League Baseball.

But when it comes to pure revenue, media rights revenue is expected to reach $20.6 billion in 2019, compared to $20.1 billion for ticket sales.




StillAWarrior

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 4212
Re: Why TV ratings in sports are more important than attendance
« Reply #1 on: November 21, 2015, 10:01:16 AM »
There's some really interesting stuff in there.  Two things immediately jump out at me.  First, I'm amazed that media rights was the lowest revenue stream as recently as 2013.  Second, the current lowest of the revenue streams (merch) is approximately where the highest (merch and gate) were ten years ago.
Never wrestle with a pig.  You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.

warriorchick

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8081
Re: Why TV ratings in sports are more important than attendance
« Reply #2 on: November 21, 2015, 11:27:51 AM »
I think this graphic would be a lot more meaningful if it were broken out a little more. 

I would be interested to see what the graph looked like if it was college sports only, or football vs. basketball.  I doubt that the lines would parallel this graph if you drilled down more.  I bet they are all over the place.

Have some patience, FFS.

ChicosBailBonds

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22695
  • #AllInnocentLivesMatter
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Why TV ratings in sports are more important than attendance
« Reply #3 on: November 21, 2015, 11:31:49 AM »
I think this graphic would be a lot more meaningful if it were broken out a little more. 

I would be interested to see what the graph looked like if it was college sports only, or football vs. basketball.  I doubt that the lines would parallel this graph if you drilled down more.  I bet they are all over the place.

Correct you are

Coleman

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 3450
Re: Why TV ratings in sports are more important than attendance
« Reply #4 on: November 24, 2015, 03:27:44 PM »
I think this graphic would be a lot more meaningful if it were broken out a little more. 

I would be interested to see what the graph looked like if it was college sports only, or football vs. basketball.  I doubt that the lines would parallel this graph if you drilled down more.  I bet they are all over the place.

Yep.

This chart tells me nothing.

MU's breakdown probably looks way different than the Dallas Cowboys or LA Lakers or New York Yankees.