collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

NM by tower912
[Today at 05:36:03 PM]


TBT by ATL MU Warrior
[Today at 05:30:14 PM]


Recruiting as of 7/15/25 by MuMark
[Today at 04:35:55 PM]


Open practice by MuMark
[Today at 04:13:05 PM]


Pearson to MU by MarquetteMike1977
[July 16, 2025, 10:19:36 PM]


Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by wadesworld
[July 16, 2025, 02:53:20 PM]


Scholarship Table by Nukem2
[July 16, 2025, 10:25:43 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

NersEllenson

Quote from: Lennys Tap on February 05, 2014, 09:45:22 PM
Derrick has taken 116 shots. 12 of them are 3 point shots. So, 104 2 point attempts. He has made 47 shots. 1 of them was a 3 point shot. So, 46 2 point makes. 46 (2s made) divided by 104 (2s attempted) = .442. .442 = 44.2% of 2 point shots (or lay ups, as you call them) made. That's where the 44% was "pulled from". Now, where did you pull that 40.5 or that 35 from?

FYI -  3 pt FG attempts don't get counted as part of the FG Attempts Stat - it is a separate stat.

Derrick is 47 of 116 (.405) on 2pg FG attempts, and 1 of 12 on 3pt FG attempts.  Derrick has shot the ball 128 times this year, and has made 48 shots. 

Quote from: ATL MU Warrior on February 06, 2014, 06:25:10 AM
He was too busy being an all-universe basketball talent to study the maths.

See above ATL - as part of being a ball player, you understand 3pt FGA are a separate stat and don't get factored into your FG%.
"I'm not sure Cadougan would fix the problems on this team. I'm not even convinced he would be better for this team than DeWil is."

BrewCity77, December 8, 2013

MerrittsMustache

Quote from: Ners on February 06, 2014, 09:22:44 AM
FYI -  3 pt FG attempts don't get counted as part of the FG Attempts Stat - it is a separate stat.

Derrick is 47 of 116 (.405) on 2pg FG attempts, and 1 of 12 on 3pt FG attempts.  Derrick has shot the ball 128 times this year, and has made 48 shots.  

See above ATL - as part of being a ball player, you understand 3pt FGA are a separate stat and don't get factored into your FG%.





The stat "field goal attempts" means field goals attempted. Three point attempts are field goals attempted. Therefore, three point attempts are "field goal attempts."


NersEllenson

Quote from: MerrittsMustache on February 06, 2014, 08:40:42 AM
Similar to how Ners credits Dawson with misses that were "right on" and discounts Derrick's assists as being 8th grade caliber, he also discounts a few of Derrick's makes as being too easy while counting shots Derrick should have taken and would have missed. Running those numbers, I actually get 34.8%. It's pretty basic.


Sorry Merritt - Not the only one who sees it this way.  The "Eye Test" has some "merit."  What's really alarming is when the eye test AND statistics support that a player is struggling mightily..and one can't acknowledge that players limitations....at that point it is simply ego and stubbornness...something Buzz is struggling with this year...

Saw this posted on Scout site:
warriors3122
Member
2174 posts this site
Ignore this Member
Send Private Message
Nominate | Report
Posted: Yesterday 7:29 PM
Re: I liked the Buzz rotation of Dawson at 2G
This is not a personal attack. It is only an observation. Last night, I got to sit in the third row. From that vantage point, some of Derrick's missed shots were nothing short of incredible. I know he does more than score, etc, etc, etc, but a D1 player shouldn't miss a 2 foot shot by 3 feet.
Buzz is going to keep playing it the way he has all year.
"I'm not sure Cadougan would fix the problems on this team. I'm not even convinced he would be better for this team than DeWil is."

BrewCity77, December 8, 2013

GGGG

Quote from: Ners on February 06, 2014, 09:33:19 AM
Sorry Merritt - Not the only one who sees it this way.  The "Eye Test" has some "merit."  What's really alarming is when the eye test AND statistics support that a player is struggling mightily..and one can't acknowledge that players limitations....at that point it is simply ego and stubbornness...something Buzz is struggling with this year...


Someone's struggling with it this year....but it aint Buzz.

NersEllenson

Quote from: The Sultan of Syncopation on February 06, 2014, 09:37:55 AM

Someone's struggling with it this year....but it aint Buzz.

Clearly you, Merritt, Lenny, ATL, and Gooo.....

"I'm not sure Cadougan would fix the problems on this team. I'm not even convinced he would be better for this team than DeWil is."

BrewCity77, December 8, 2013

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


GGGG

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on February 06, 2014, 09:46:40 AM
I see what you did there.


Well I mean c'mon... 

It's just getting comical.  The ego is Ners constantly believing that one player is better than another to the point where he thinks he knows better than the coach.  Of course he then has to claim that coach is being stubborn and egotistical rather than admit that maybe Ners himself might be wrong.  The stubbornness is doubling-down on the assertions.

Of course then there is the whole "were you on the basketball team or in the pep band" question in the other thread.

I mean...WTF? 

MerrittsMustache

Quote from: The Sultan of Syncopation on February 06, 2014, 09:52:16 AM

Well I mean c'mon... 

It's just getting comical.  The ego is Ners constantly believing that one player is better than another to the point where he thinks he knows better than the coach.  Of course he then has to claim that coach is being stubborn and egotistical rather than admit that maybe Ners himself might be wrong.  The stubbornness is doubling-down on the assertions.

Of course then there is the whole "were you on the basketball team or in the pep band" question in the other thread.

I mean...WTF? 

On the moratorium thread, I just vowed to stop responding to Ners' endless Derrick-Dawson rants. He keeps saying the same things but I keep responding so I guess I'm guilty of being an enabler. Honestly, what's the point? His mind is made up and absolutely nothing is going to change it.


River rat

Devante scores alot of points too...I nominate him to be the point guard!!

Not sure what game the OP went to, but nothing I saw in the Butler gamer or anyother game I have ever seen Mayo play in makes me think he should be the point guard.  He actually does not have a very good handle and makes a good amount of very bad passes.

This is another very absurd post in a seoson of truly absurd posts 

dddawson

Loved Todd .... He did mad work .... But it's been proven in a pressure situation VS Georgetown that if young Dawson is given plus minutes and opportunity to play and play thru that he can get some things done .... 3 months into the system which once again proves he's a BALLER .... It's understandable to trust the vets 3years vs3months ... But there's no way you can fairly discredit young Dawson until he gets ample mins like VS the hoyas and that was away and necessary

g0lden3agle

Quote from: dddawson on February 06, 2014, 12:36:45 PM
Loved Todd .... He did mad work .... But it's been proven in a pressure situation VS Georgetown that if young Dawson is given plus minutes and opportunity to play and play thru that he can get some things done .... 3 months into the system which once again proves he's a BALLER .... It's understandable to trust the vets 3years vs3months ... But there's no way you can fairly discredit young Dawson until he gets ample mins like VS the hoyas and that was away and necessary


No doubt.  If anyone was to get more minutes at PG it would be Dawson.  The offense running through Todd does not mean he should be the PG.  It simply means he should be out on the court as much as possible.

dddawson

Loved that Derrick did great too ..... Stepped up and lead

ATWizJr

Quote from: MerrittsMustache on February 06, 2014, 09:58:39 AM
On the moratorium thread, I just vowed to stop responding to Ners' endless Derrick-Dawson rants. He keeps saying the same things but I keep responding so I guess I'm guilty of being an enabler. Honestly, what's the point? His mind is made up and absolutely nothing is going to change it.


If NERS goes away will bma725 return?

mattyv1908

I'm sorry I began this post.  My headline should have read differently.  It should have been 'Todd Mayo alleviates PG problems' or something to that affect.

Thanks Ners and Sync for another Derrick Wilson thread - SARCASM

My main point that got lost in translation was that there is no reason that either Wilson or Dawson has to be on the court for 40 minutes.  Todd Mayo along with another guard and preferably Jamil can run the show for 8-12 minutes a game which effectively does two things:

1.  Let's Derrick Wilson contribute where he does.  He's a 20-25 minute guy who does play solid peremeter defense when he's not gassed.

2.  Let Dawson get his 7-12 minutes without asking him to do too much.  At this point we're too far along to hand the keys over to a freshman with limited minutes.  We can argue what could have, should have, would have been but at this point it's pointless and doesn't benefit the team these last 8 games.

I apologize for what has been another journey down the rabbit hole or an online d!ck measuring contest played out by two guys under the guise of who the better point guard is.  If it was up to me I'm not sure I'd want either Wilson or Dawson representing my figurative manhood.
Shut this board down at the opening tip.  If they win, open it back up.  If they lose, keep it shut it down until the next morning.  - Sultan of Slurpery

Lennys Tap

Quote from: Ners on February 06, 2014, 09:22:44 AM
FYI -  3 pt FG attempts don't get counted as part of the FG Attempts Stat - it is a separate stat.

Derrick is 47 of 116 (.405) on 2pg FG attempts, and 1 of 12 on 3pt FG attempts.  Derrick has shot the ball 128 times this year, and has made 48 shots. 

See above ATL - as part of being a ball player, you understand 3pt FGA are a separate stat and don't get factored into your FG%.


You are absolutely, positively, unequivocally 100% wrong. Look at Jake's numbers. Is he 45 of 132 on 2 point attempts and 42 of 112 on 3s? Of course not. They are NOT separate stats. Want his 2 point %? Just like I did with Derrick, subtract his 3 point attempts (112) from his total FG attempts (132). He's shot 20. To get 2 point FGs made subtract 3s made (42) from total made (45). So he's 3-20 or 15% on 2 point attempts, 42-112 (37.5%) on 3s, and 45-132 (34.1) overall. Follow?

ATL MU Warrior

Quote from: Lennys Tap on February 06, 2014, 03:08:32 PM
You are absolutely, positively, unequivocally 100% wrong. Look at Jake's numbers. Is he 45 of 132 on 2 point attempts and 42 of 112 on 3s? Of course not. They are NOT separate stats. Want his 2 point %? Just like I did with Derrick, subtract his 3 point attempts (112) from his total FG attempts (132). He's shot 20. To get 2 point FGs made subtract 3s made (42) from total made (45). So he's 3-20 or 15% on 2 point attempts, 42-112 (37.5%) on 3s, and 45-132 (34.1) overall. Follow?

Quote from: Ners on February 06, 2014, 09:22:44 AM
See above ATL - as part of being a ball player, you understand 3pt FGA are a separate stat and don't get factored into your FG%.

See above Ners - <hysterical laughing ensues> I guess we finally have our confirmation of your grossly exaggerated basketball pedigree.  After all, as part of being a ball player...... priceless.

When are you going to respond to the other thread BTW?   ::)

TAMU, Knower of Ball

Quote from: Lennys Tap on February 06, 2014, 03:08:32 PM
You are absolutely, positively, unequivocally 100% wrong. Look at Jake's numbers. Is he 45 of 132 on 2 point attempts and 42 of 112 on 3s? Of course not. They are NOT separate stats. Want his 2 point %? Just like I did with Derrick, subtract his 3 point attempts (112) from his total FG attempts (132). He's shot 20. To get 2 point FGs made subtract 3s made (42) from total made (45). So he's 3-20 or 15% on 2 point attempts, 42-112 (37.5%) on 3s, and 45-132 (34.1) overall. Follow?


Join the moratorium Lenny! There is strength in silence!
Quote from: Goose on January 15, 2023, 08:43:46 PM
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


Previous topic - Next topic