collapse

* '23-'24 SOTG Tally


2023-24 Season SoG Tally
Kolek11
Ighodaro6
Jones, K.6
Mitchell2
Jones, S.1
Joplin1

'22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

* Big East Standings

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address.  We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or register NOW!

* Next up: The long cold summer

Marquette
Marquette

Open Practice

Date/Time: Oct 11, 2024 ???
TV: NA
Schedule for 2023-24
27-10

Author Topic: Travon Bunch  (Read 57819 times)

willie warrior

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9598
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #100 on: October 24, 2013, 07:19:16 PM »

LOL....yes you are correct.  Back in January of DG's freshman year I did say that.

And I was right then.

Good think he improved.
Your credibility is gone when you said that. And by the way, Gardner was better than Otule even then. But of course you believe you were right. You are after all, a legend in your own mind.
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind.

Benny B

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 5969
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #101 on: October 24, 2013, 08:11:25 PM »
That pic isn't very representative of AFSOC ops. Those guys are in a TOC directing CAS in a set piece operation. Our teams are almost always independent and covert.

He looked pretty covert to me... how else do you explain the ND mascot beard?
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny.  Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #102 on: October 24, 2013, 08:50:50 PM »
Your credibility is gone when you said that. And by the way, Gardner was better than Otule even then. But of course you believe you were right. You are after all, a legend in your own mind.


There is absolutely no way that you could look at them back on January 23, 2011 and claim Davante was better.  He was coming off a couple DNPs and some single digit minute games to start the BE season.  He was out of shape, couldn't defends, and racked up most of his points against poor opponents.

Otule was a solid, double digit minute guy who was doing a little bit of everything.

Now by the end of the year, Gardner started to emerge.  But at that point Otule was clearly better.

But if you need to feel better about yourself that you have to go back two and a half years ago to prove me wrong, more power to you.

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26512
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #103 on: October 24, 2013, 10:42:10 PM »
Your credibility is gone when you said that. And by the way, Gardner was better than Otule even then. But of course you believe you were right. You are after all, a legend in your own mind.

And there are probably 2 people on this board that actually believe Gardner was better at that time. He simply wasn't. He was completely a one-dimensional player. Gardner added low-post scoring but couldn't play a lick of defense.

Look at the numbers in the 10 games prior to that post by Sultan:

Gardner: 43 minutes played, 4/9 FGs, 10 points, 7 rebounds, 1 block, 2 DNPs
Otule: 150 minutes played, 16/31 FGs, 41 points, 21 rebounds, 6 blocks, 0 DNPs

And trust me...you really don't want to discount the best performance by each player. 70% of Gardner's scoring in that stretch came against Mississippi Valley State. Otule did also have one game bigger than the rest...but that was against Vanderbilt. Otule was far and away our best big man that season. Only an idiot would contend otherwise.
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.

willie warrior

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 9598
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #104 on: October 25, 2013, 06:11:09 AM »

There is absolutely no way that you could look at them back on January 23, 2011 and claim Davante was better.  He was coming off a couple DNPs and some single digit minute games to start the BE season.  He was out of shape, couldn't defends, and racked up most of his points against poor opponents.

Otule was a solid, double digit minute guy who was doing a little bit of everything.

Now by the end of the year, Gardner started to emerge.  But at that point Otule was clearly better.

But if you need to feel better about yourself that you have to go back two and a half years ago to prove me wrong, more power to you.
No, you said you never said--so you proved yourself wrong didn't you. Hope you feel good too.
And I get a real kick out "doing a little bit of everything"--whatever that means. As I recall Gardner's points per minute were better than Otule's even then. Gradner was just arrived, Otule already had two years on him. I still get a kick out of the Otule love. Next Roy Hibbert, etc. After being at MU for 6 years, I sure hope he will do a little bit of everything. But a career 5PPG, and what 3 or 4 RPG after that time does not get me as excited as the Great Sultan.
Yeah, I like Otule, but I just see things differently than the great  Analysis of Sultan, who continues to expound on his keen basketball analysis.
I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind.

GGGG

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 25207
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #105 on: October 25, 2013, 06:20:39 AM »
Stop.  You're embarrassing me.

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26512
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #106 on: October 25, 2013, 08:04:20 AM »
No, you said you never said--so you proved yourself wrong didn't you. Hope you feel good too.
And I get a real kick out "doing a little bit of everything"--whatever that means. As I recall Gardner's points per minute were better than Otule's even then. Gradner was just arrived, Otule already had two years on him. I still get a kick out of the Otule love. Next Roy Hibbert, etc. After being at MU for 6 years, I sure hope he will do a little bit of everything. But a career 5PPG, and what 3 or 4 RPG after that time does not get me as excited as the Great Sultan.
Yeah, I like Otule, but I just see things differently than the great  Analysis of Sultan, who continues to expound on his keen basketball analysis.

willie, you are maybe the most foolish, clueless poster I have ever experienced. I could completely deconstruct that entire post, but it'd be a waste of time because the effort would be lost on you.
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.

bilsu

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8825
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #107 on: October 25, 2013, 08:19:18 AM »

There is absolutely no way that you could look at them back on January 23, 2011 and claim Davante was better.  He was coming off a couple DNPs and some single digit minute games to start the BE season.  He was out of shape, couldn't defends, and racked up most of his points against poor opponents.

Otule was a solid, double digit minute guy who was doing a little bit of everything.

Now by the end of the year, Gardner started to emerge.  But at that point Otule was clearly better.

But if you need to feel better about yourself that you have to go back two and a half years ago to prove me wrong, more power to you.
He did not play, because of a shoulder injury. Prior to the injury he was better than Otule on the offensive end. He has never been better than Otule on the defensive end. He has always been a better rebounder although his rebounds generally come on the offensive end.

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26512
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #108 on: October 25, 2013, 08:42:46 AM »
He did not play, because of a shoulder injury. Prior to the injury he was better than Otule on the offensive end. He has never been better than Otule on the defensive end. He has always been a better rebounder although his rebounds generally come on the offensive end.

I'd love to see the numbers if you discounted Gardner rebounding his own misses. I have no idea what the results would be, but it wouldn't surprise me if a third of DG's rebounds were from his own misses.

Also...not disputing DG has always been a better offensive player than CO, but Chris was hurt more that season because Buycks was running the point. Chris' disability hurt him even more when half the entry passes to him were bounce passes.
« Last Edit: October 25, 2013, 08:45:54 AM by brewcity77 »
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.

Dawson Rental

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10456
  • I prefer a team that's eligible, not paid for
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #109 on: October 25, 2013, 10:39:01 AM »
I'd love to see the numbers if you discounted Gardner rebounding his own misses. I have no idea what the results would be, but it wouldn't surprise me if a third of DG's rebounds were from his own misses.

Also...not disputing DG has always been a better offensive player than CO, but Chris was hurt more that season because Buycks was running the point. Chris' disability hurt him even more when half the entry passes to him were bounce passes.

I have no problem with a player increasing his rebounding stats by rebounding his own misses when that same player has the highest FG% on the team.  Missing a shot and not getting the rebound is hardly a virtue, it's often a lost possession.
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

Lennys Tap

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12315
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #110 on: October 25, 2013, 11:11:03 AM »
I'd love to see the numbers if you discounted Gardner rebounding his own misses. I have no idea what the results would be, but it wouldn't surprise me if a third of DG's rebounds were from his own misses.

Also...not disputing DG has always been a better offensive player than CO, but Chris was hurt more that season because Buycks was running the point. Chris' disability hurt him even more when half the entry passes to him were bounce passes.

I have no problem discounting DG's rebounds of his own misses if you also don't count a rebounded miss as a field goal attempt. His rebounding totals would suffer, but his already off the charts FG% would be through the roof.

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26512
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #111 on: October 25, 2013, 12:06:23 PM »
In discounting rebounding his own misses, I meant more to analyze how good a rebounder he actually is. That's what made Rodman so good, he had such a sense of reading how the ball was going to come off and despite often being the smallest guy in the frontcourt, he still managed to get to the ball nearly every time. It's easier to get your own misses because the ball is usually going to come right back to you.

Not meant as a criticism of Davante, he's an excellent offensive player and I am overjoyed we have a center of his caliber, I'm just curious how his rebounding stacks up when other people shoot. That's more what I meant. Not so much ignoring his own misses, but what his (and CO's, and others) rebounding percentage is on other players' shots.
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.

KenoshaWarrior

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1539
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #112 on: October 25, 2013, 01:46:16 PM »
Only on Scoop, can a conversation about a Racine Horlick recruit morph into an argument about Steve Novak being a big.

Lennys Tap

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 12315
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #113 on: October 25, 2013, 01:51:02 PM »
In discounting rebounding his own misses, I meant more to analyze how good a rebounder he actually is. That's what made Rodman so good, he had such a sense of reading how the ball was going to come off and despite often being the smallest guy in the frontcourt, he still managed to get to the ball nearly every time. It's easier to get your own misses because the ball is usually going to come right back to you.

Not meant as a criticism of Davante, he's an excellent offensive player and I am overjoyed we have a center of his caliber, I'm just curious how his rebounding stacks up when other people shoot. That's more what I meant. Not so much ignoring his own misses, but what his (and CO's, and others) rebounding percentage is on other players' shots.

I agree with you that his rebounding stats are skewed - he's not as good as his numbers would suggest. But offensively, he's even more off the charts than his FG% would indicate.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22205
  • Meat Eater certified
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #114 on: October 25, 2013, 03:28:41 PM »
Only on Scoop, can a conversation about a Racine Horlick recruit morph into an argument about Steve Novak being a big.

+1
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


bilsu

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8825
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #115 on: October 25, 2013, 04:21:34 PM »
2010-11
Otule 651 min off reb 58 def reb 76 total rebounds 134
Gardner 296 min off reb 35 def reb 38 total rebs 73
double Gardner's number
592 min off reb 70 def reb 76 total rebounds 146
Yes Gardner was rebounding on the offensive boards at a greater pace than Otule, but he was also rebounding on the defensive boards at a greater pace.

real chili 83

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8662
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #116 on: October 25, 2013, 07:47:29 PM »
Tom Crean sucks.

There, somebody said it.

Dawson Rental

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10456
  • I prefer a team that's eligible, not paid for
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #117 on: October 25, 2013, 09:30:08 PM »
2010-11
Otule 651 min off reb 58 def reb 76 total rebounds 134
Gardner 296 min off reb 35 def reb 38 total rebs 73
double Gardner's number
592 min off reb 70 def reb 76 total rebounds 146
Yes Gardner was rebounding on the offensive boards at a greater pace than Otule, but he was also rebounding on the defensive boards at a greater pace.

"And that's the fact, Jack!"
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26512
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #118 on: October 25, 2013, 11:30:52 PM »
2010-11
Otule 651 min off reb 58 def reb 76 total rebounds 134
Gardner 296 min off reb 35 def reb 38 total rebs 73
double Gardner's number
592 min off reb 70 def reb 76 total rebounds 146
Yes Gardner was rebounding on the offensive boards at a greater pace than Otule, but he was also rebounding on the defensive boards at a greater pace.

I specifically said in the last post I made I'm not trying to compare CO and DG, so this really had no relevance.
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.

bilsu

  • Registered User
  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 8825
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #119 on: October 26, 2013, 08:32:00 AM »
I'd love to see the numbers if you discounted Gardner rebounding his own misses. I have no idea what the results would be, but it wouldn't surprise me if a third of DG's rebounds were from his own misses.
I posted the stats , because of this post.

brewcity77

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 26512
  • Warning-This poster may trigger thin skinned users
    • Cracked Sidewalks
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #120 on: October 26, 2013, 09:40:15 AM »
I posted the stats , because of this post.

I realize that, but that post had two separate points about DG and CO, neither of which was meant as a comparison.
This space reserved for a 2024 2025 National Championship celebration banner.

TAMU, Knower of Ball

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 22205
  • Meat Eater certified
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #121 on: May 11, 2014, 10:22:02 PM »
http://www.allmetrohoops.com/index.php/recruiting-news/87-news-articles/133-trevon-bunch-expected-to-explode-this-summer

Travon Bunch has reclassified to the 2015 class. Will be playing ball for Mt. Zion Academy in North Carolina.

Travon mentioned Marquette by name.

Quote
He had this to say about Marquette, “I like their style of play.  It’s just they are missing a solid big man.”  He believes he could help them solve that problem if he chooses them.

Averaged 15 points, 7 boards, and 3 blocks for Horlick High last season.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2014, 10:26:48 PM by TAMU Eagle »
TAMU

I do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.


Dawson Rental

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10456
  • I prefer a team that's eligible, not paid for
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #122 on: May 11, 2014, 11:01:05 PM »
http://www.allmetrohoops.com/index.php/recruiting-news/87-news-articles/133-trevon-bunch-expected-to-explode-this-summer

Travon Bunch has reclassified to the 2015 class. Will be playing ball for Mt. Zion Academy in North Carolina.

Travon mentioned Marquette by name.

Averaged 15 points, 7 boards, and 3 blocks for Horlick High last season.

He wasn't at Horlick High last season.  I believe that those numbers are probably from Mt. Zion, although they could also be from his first semester team, St. Louis Christian Academy.

Since the article you quote predates the coaching change, I'm not certain that Marquette is still recruiting Travon.  He may, in fact, epitomize the kind of player that made MU squeamish about Buzz.

A quote from the article regarding Marquette; "It’s just they are missing a solid big man” might cause one to question his basketball IQ, particularly in regards to PG play.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2014, 01:10:36 PM by LittleMurs »
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

Dawson Rental

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 10456
  • I prefer a team that's eligible, not paid for
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #123 on: June 14, 2014, 05:55:17 PM »
Travon is now listed as a player for Georgia Prep Sports Academy in Atlanta, GA.  He has an offer from Tennessee, and is visiting there in August.

Does anyone know the record for the number of high schools attended by a Division I basketball player?
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

Texas Western

  • All American
  • *****
  • Posts: 1207
Re: Travon Bunch
« Reply #124 on: June 14, 2014, 07:52:22 PM »
Looks like Travon has a positive feeling toward Marquette. Hopefully he  does well this year on both the academic and athletic front this year.  An extra year will be a great thing for him.

 

feedback