collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

To the Rafters by tower912
[Today at 02:25:28 PM]


2025-26 Schedule by brewcity77
[Today at 02:10:17 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by Jay Bee
[Today at 11:51:18 AM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by tower912
[Today at 11:15:09 AM]


NCAA settlement approved - schools now can (and will) directly pay athletes by Uncle Rico
[Today at 05:58:53 AM]


Stars of Tomorrow Show featured Adrian Stevens by tower912
[July 06, 2025, 08:50:48 PM]


25 YEARS OF THE AP TOP 25 by Galway Eagle
[July 06, 2025, 01:43:39 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

Tommy Brice for Coach


Oldgym


MUMountin

Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on March 07, 2013, 08:09:39 AM
The supposed problem is that it makes any email that comes to, or leaves from, the servers at the public schools subject to public records requests, but IMO that isn't that big of a deal. 

Agreed--while a consideration, I think the FOIA thing, in and of itself, has been blown out of proportion with VCU.  IMO, the bigger issue (of which the FOIA implications may be a smaller part), with VCU is a cultural/branding thing.  As the only large, public institution, they'd be a significant outlier.  I think the conference is making an intentional effort to gather schools with similar profiles to help the branding of the conference overall--not just in basketball.  

mu_hilltopper

Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on March 07, 2013, 08:09:39 AM

Actually from a legal standpoint, the C7 are leaving, and buying the rights to the name.  So it is an accurate report.


Accurate schmacurate!

GGGG

Quote from: MUMountin on March 07, 2013, 09:50:38 AM
Agreed--while a consideration, I think the FOIA thing, in and of itself, has been blown out of proportion with VCU.  IMO, the bigger issue (of which the FOIA implications may be a smaller part), with VCU is a cultural/branding thing.  As the only large, public institution, they'd be a significant outlier.  I think the conference is making an intentional effort to gather schools with similar profiles to help the branding of the conference overall--not just in basketball. 


I think that is exactly it.  And not just for branding reasons, but because of football possibilities.  It is *much* easier for public universities to set up football programs than it is for privates.  And one of VCU's former conference mates is moving ahead with that - Old Dominion.  And in fact will be part of Conference USA along with Charlotte.  I don't know if the C7 really trust any public university for that very reason.

Windyplayer

Quote from: MU82 on March 07, 2013, 08:38:34 AM
"The league's offices will remain in Providence, R.I., for at least a couple of years, sources said, even though Providence College is leaving."

I think this is my favorite rarely-discussed part of it. The soon-to-be-ex-Big East schools have no idea where their office will be so they're leaving it in the cradle of the old Big East, where they have no presence and where they will be reminded daily of what they used to be.
I have no ill will toward the conference we're leaving. I don't think any of this is Aresco's fault (maybe for not taking the huge deal offered by ESPN initially, but larger forces were at play here that would have ultimately manifested themselves in the current conference shifts). This break-up lies squarely on the shoulders of Cuse and PITT, and to a lesser degree WVU for precipitating the movement.  

Do I take some pleasure in Cincy and UCONN lingering in Nirvana? Yes.

jficke13

Quote from: MUMonster03 on March 07, 2013, 09:18:59 AM
Does anyone currently watch games on a Fox produced regional channel? Just curious as to what their broadcast look like since I am so used to the ESPN/CBS layout. Even the current Big East Network obviously uses ESPN resources since it looks exactly the same. Just curious.

I haven't watched Fox Sports regional broadcasts of basketball, but I watch their baseball broadcasts a lot on Fox Sorts Wisconsin for the Brewers. Those productions are usually uneven early in the year and become pretty good by May. In my opinion, the production value on Brewers games never gets to the level that Fox national playoff games reach (obviously), but are far from amateurish. If our basketball games are broadcast as well as the typical FSWisconsin baseball game it would be a 6-7/10 and very watchable I think,

GGGG

Well, Aresco wasn't apparently the best of communicators and that manifested itself with the decision to add Tulane.  And while you can blame Pitt and Syracuse, honestly if you were in their shoes, you would take the ACC invite as well.  

jficke13

Quote from: MUMonster03 on March 07, 2013, 09:18:59 AM
Does anyone currently watch games on a Fox produced regional channel? Just curious as to what their broadcast look like since I am so used to the ESPN/CBS layout. Even the current Big East Network obviously uses ESPN resources since it looks exactly the same. Just curious.

Although, what I said above might be true, but if they bring on total hacks for talent that can't be bothered to research the teams or ask an SID for clarification on name pronunciation, then we'll be complaining about the broadcasts.

I've done a MU game in the past as color; we had it online and some people here said my partner and I did a decent job. I'm not an ex-basketball player and wasn't even a broadcasting major. It's not that hard of a job if you take it seriously.

Litehouse

Didn't Fox carry the Paradise Jam tournament last year?  That wasn't exactly top notch production.

GGGG

Quote from: Litehouse on March 07, 2013, 10:25:21 AM
Didn't Fox carry the Paradise Jam tournament last year?  That wasn't exactly top notch production.


But that was produced by some independent production house and sold to Fox.

Pakuni

Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on March 07, 2013, 08:09:39 AM

The supposed problem is that it makes any email that comes to, or leaves from, the servers at the public schools subject to public records requests, but IMO that isn't that big of a deal. 

It also isn't true.
Though it differs somewhat from state to state, there are many exemptions to the Freedom of Information Act. In Virginia, since that's the state we're talking about here, those exemptions include:
- personnel records
- attorney work product and privileged matters
- records of contract negotiations (not the final contract)
- student records
- health records

So, while having public institutions as members would open the conference up to some additional scrutiny, it's hardly the "everything is public" scenario some seem to be suggesting.
And, of course, every other major conference out there seems to be managing just fine with public school members.

There are reasons to prefer other schools over VCU, but this shouldn't be one of them.

warriorchick

Quote from: Litehouse on March 07, 2013, 10:25:21 AM
Didn't Fox carry the Paradise Jam tournament last year?  That wasn't exactly top notch production.

Doesn't anyone remember what happened when Fox won an NFL Sunday contract for the first time?  Everyone was certain that they would not be able to pull it off, and the product they would put out would be far inferior to the Big Three.  But instead, they hired great talent (for the most part), became technology innovators (Why do you think they call it the Fox box?), and had the other networks scrambling to keep up.

Why would they put any less effort into FoxSports1?
Have some patience, FFS.

jficke13

Quote from: warriorchick on March 07, 2013, 10:34:00 AM
Why would they put any less effort into FoxSports1?

This is the key. If FS1 has any intention of being a legitimate challenger to ESPN, then they have to invest in the talent and technology to do so. Go out and find good producers and behind the scenes staff who can put together a solid production. Get good exec-level producers who can give the whole network a good consist graphical/production feel. And then spring for some smooth talent for the broadcasts themselves. I know a few people firsthand who are hands down better than some of the dregs that ESPN trots out on a nightly basis and who would be WAY cheaper.

Dawson Rental

#39
Quote from: windyplayer on March 07, 2013, 09:57:57 AM
I have no ill will toward the conference we're leaving. I don't think any of this is Aresco's fault (maybe for not taking the huge deal offered by ESPN initially, but larger forces were at play here that would have ultimately manifested themselves in the current conference shifts). This break-up lies squarely on the shoulders of Cuse and PITT, and to a lesser degree WVU for precipitating the movement.  

Do I take some pleasure in Cincy and UCONN lingering in Nirvana? Yes.

You can blame Pitt for leading the charge to turn down ESPN's contract offer.  Or, you can blame ESPN for convincing the ACC to add Pitt and Syracuse.  Or you can say that how ever it happened, with football and TV involved, it was bound to happen.  The point is we're free of the mess - which in my mind will get messier still - with the best possible group of like situated schools, in a stable environment for the first time.  And we got away with a very favorable agreement.  Yea!

All I can say is thank God Pitt put the kaboosh on Villanova moving their football team up to FBS status in the Big East.
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

77fan88warrior

What are the dollar terms of the deal?  IS C7 paying real dollars or are they walking away from fees paid by schools that jumped ship?

WarriorInNYC

Quote from: MUMonster03 on March 07, 2013, 09:18:59 AM
Does anyone currently watch games on a Fox produced regional channel? Just curious as to what their broadcast look like since I am so used to the ESPN/CBS layout. Even the current Big East Network obviously uses ESPN resources since it looks exactly the same. Just curious.

I haven't watched any this year.

BUT......they do have Gus Johnson under contract.

TallTitan34

I hope they bring back the Foxtrax they had for hockey which put a trail behind the puck. 

Quote from: 77fan88warrior on March 07, 2013, 11:47:38 AM
What are the dollar terms of the deal?  IS C7 paying real dollars or are they walking away from fees paid by schools that jumped ship?

That's a good point.  I guess we are essentially giving up our exit fee money to kick schools we don't want out. 

Pakuni

Quote from: TallTitan34 on March 07, 2013, 12:22:43 PM
I hope they bring back the Foxtrax they had for hockey which put a trail behind the puck. 

That's a good point.  I guess we are essentially giving up our exit fee money to kick schools we don't want out. 

Correct. Most of the money going to the schools being left behind are the exit fees paid by schools like Syracuse, Pitt, WVU, Rutgers, etc..

TallTitan34

Any timeframe for the statement?

Tigidal

Quote from: WarriorInDC on March 07, 2013, 12:15:08 PM
I haven't watched any this year.

BUT......they do have Gus Johnson under contract.

Has anyone else heard Gus Johnson doing the Barclay's League games on Fox Soccer?  I def did a double-take.  Hate when they've got the US guys announcing.  At least he's been at the games tho.

MUWarrior4Life

I'm curious, what kind of broadcasters does Fox Sports have? Any good 1's compared to ESPN's?

Pakuni

Quote from: MUWarrior4Life on March 07, 2013, 12:38:10 PM
I'm curious, what kind of broadcasters does Fox Sports have? Any good 1's compared to ESPN's?



JakeBarnes

Quote from: MUWarrior4Life on March 07, 2013, 12:38:10 PM
I'm curious, what kind of broadcasters does Fox Sports have? Any good 1's compared to ESPN's?


Assume what I say should be in teal if it doesn't pass the smell test for you.

"We all carry within us our places of exile, our crimes and our ravages. But our task is not to unleash them on the world; it is to fight them in ourselves and in others." -Camus, The Rebel

martyconlonontherun

Quote from: MUMountin on March 07, 2013, 09:50:38 AM
Agreed--while a consideration, I think the FOIA thing, in and of itself, has been blown out of proportion with VCU.  IMO, the bigger issue (of which the FOIA implications may be a smaller part), with VCU is a cultural/branding thing.  As the only large, public institution, they'd be a significant outlier.  I think the conference is making an intentional effort to gather schools with similar profiles to help the branding of the conference overall--not just in basketball.  

They would be bizzaro Northwestern.

Previous topic - Next topic