Now that GWB laid out the case for fighting Al Quida in Iraq-----the liberal media is using the spin that "the vast majority of Al Quida in Iraq are Iraqi's" and are therefore on their own-----and that "our biggest threat from Al Quida comes from Pakistan"-----with the implication that we should be doing more there (what invade another country?).
On the first allegation, never mind the fact that Gen Patreaus mentioned the other day that most of the Al Quida in Iraq were Saudis. Another thing that escapes the liberal spin is that Al Masri the leader of Al Quida/Iraq spent a lot of time with Bin Laden in Afghanistan (hmmm, I wonder how he got the top job in Iraq).
On the second point about Al Quida/Pakistan being the biggest threat to the USA----this may or may not be true-----never mind though that Bin Laden implored Zarqawi (when alive) to plan and mount attacks from Iraq on the USA and elsewhere) -----but even if true that Al Quida/Pakistan does present a greater danger, does that mean for example that you stop fighting the Germans & Rommel in northern Africa or that we stop fighting Mussolini in Italy because the biggest threat posed by the Germans was in western continental Europe?
