collapse

Resources

Stud of St. John's Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1
Parham1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

MU/ St.John’s game thread by MarquetteMike1977
[Today at 11:02:10 AM]


Portal by MarquetteMike1977
[Today at 10:59:51 AM]


157 minutes by wadesworld
[Today at 10:55:58 AM]


It’s Time to Think Bold by Viper
[Today at 10:27:43 AM]


The Nigel James Conundrum by Mu8891
[Today at 10:22:34 AM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by Billy Hoyle
[Today at 08:56:40 AM]


Golden Eagles vs Red Storm by NCMUFan
[Today at 06:56:13 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: @ DePaul

Marquette
68
Marquette @
DePaul
Date/Time: Jan 17, 2026, 7:30pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
St. John's
92

GGGG

Was at Creighton this weekend.  Apparently going to visit us and UTEP.

2013 PG from Clovis, NM...a late bloomer from an area that doesn't produce many D1 players.

Earl Tatum


brewcity77

Solid contingency option. Would prefer Patterson, but not a bad backup to the guys we haven't landed.

GGGG

Quote from: Earl Tatum on September 25, 2012, 09:30:05 AM
Don't want him, ain't that good

Seriously, could you tone it down a bit?  If Buzz wants him, who are we to argue?  I don't mind constructive criticism...and how do you know he "ain't that good?"


bilsu

Quote from: brewcity77 on September 25, 2012, 09:49:29 AM
Solid contingency option. Would prefer Patterson, but not a bad backup to the guys we haven't landed.
Why? Paterson is not a top 100 player and may have academic issues. Even if he does not, we look bad by taking a player that supposedly could not get into Indiana.

Spotcheck Billy

Quote from: bilsu on September 26, 2012, 04:08:50 PM
Why? Paterson is not a top 100 player and may have academic issues. Even if he does not, we look bad by taking a player that supposedly could not get into Indiana.

no Crean castoffs!

brewcity77

Quote from: bilsu on September 26, 2012, 04:08:50 PM
Why? Paterson is not a top 100 player and may have academic issues. Even if he does not, we look bad by taking a player that supposedly could not get into Indiana.

Been following his recruitment longer and feel he's more of a sure bet. Really like his defense, which is important for incoming freshmen. Not sure how taking a player that couldn't get into IU makes us look bad other than in the eyes of Crean-bashers; it was a pretty clear case of TC having one too many guys on scholarship and Patterson being the lowest rated incoming recruit.

I am glad we landed Dawson. Liking Patterson is not an indictment.

Previous topic - Next topic