collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Kam update by Jay Bee
[Today at 05:50:54 PM]


Pearson to MU by Shaka Shart
[Today at 05:39:29 PM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by MU82
[Today at 05:37:23 PM]


Proposed rule changes( coaching challenges) by romey
[Today at 04:27:00 PM]


OT congrats to MU golf team. by MuMark
[Today at 02:56:55 PM]


2025-26 Schedule by Shaka Shart
[Today at 02:55:03 PM]


Ethan Johnston to Marquette by tower912
[Today at 10:56:48 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

77ncaachamps

50 most successful college bk programs in the last 50 years.

Someone do the math and figure out where MU is at. I'm feeling lazy. ;)

http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebasketballnation

Here's a little taste: Weber State comes in at #39. Florida is #40.
SS Marquette

slack00

If I had to guess, I'd say we land somewhere in the 15-20 area.

A National Championship, a few final fours, a few conference titles, only 6 losing seasons in 50 years, a few All-Americans, recent success, no forfeited or vacated wins.

Since it goes back to 1962, UCLA has to be in the top spot.  Duke, North Carolina, Kentucky, Kansas, Indiana all likely follow in some order.

Ohio State, Michigan State, Arizona, Georgetown, Syracuse probably in the next level. 

Maybe schools like UNLV, Villanova, Michigan, Illinois, Oklahoma, Purdue, UConn, Memphis, Cincy ahead of us.  I'm sure I'm forgetting a few obvious ones.

Dawson Rental

At number 45....... DePaul (ranked as the 10th best team of the '80s) hasn't gained points in any season since 2005, just two NCAA tournament appearances in the past 20 seasons.
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

Benny B

Without counting the bonus points for the independent years where MU finished higher than two other major conference teams, I'm coming up with 296 points.  The 70's account for roughly half of those points, however.

My guess is that MU is hovering right around #11 overall.


Quote from: LittleMurs on January 08, 2015, 07:10:33 PM
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny.  Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.

swoopem

I like that they're doing the starting line up from the past 50 years. What would be your guys' starting 5? Mine is

PG- Butch Lee
SG- D Wade
SF- Bo Ellis
PF- Jim Chones
C- Mo Lucas

If we're going to be sticklers on position I would have Doc Rivers at the 3, and Bo at the 4.
Bring back FFP!!!

Dr. Blackheart

Looking at number of weeks ranked (AP) in the last 50 years...MU is:


  • 14th in the Top 25
  • 12th in the Top 10
  • 15th in the Top 5

# of Seasons ranked by school -- MU falls out as: 

  • 20th in the Top 25
  • 17th in the Top 10
  • 25th in the Top 5

http://statsheet.com/mcb/rankings/report_most_in_the_top/1962-1963

GGGG

Quote from: cbowe3 on August 21, 2012, 03:43:56 PM
I like that they're doing the starting line up from the past 50 years. What would be your guys' starting 5? Mine is

PG- Butch Lee
SG- D Wade
SF- Bo Ellis
PF- Jim Chones
C- Mo Lucas

If we're going to be sticklers on position I would have Doc Rivers at the 3, and Bo at the 4.

I think you would need to have Earl Tatum ahead of Doc Rivers wouldn't you?

augoman

Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on August 21, 2012, 04:23:07 PM
I think you would need to have Earl Tatum ahead of Doc Rivers wouldn't you?

I'm with you Sultan, and probably George Thompson and Dean Meminger ahead of DWade and Butch.

BrewCity83

Quote from: augoman on August 21, 2012, 04:42:12 PM
I'm with you Sultan, and probably George Thompson and Dean Meminger ahead of DWade and Butch.

I like Thompson and Meminger, but not ahead of DWade.
The shaka sign, sometimes known as "hang loose", is a gesture of friendly intent often associated with Hawaii and surf culture.

augoman

certainly not the Wade of today, but I would the Wade of MU days.

swoopem

Yeah I would for sure have Meminger on that list instead of Lee, but when I originally created it I was thinking of guys from 1972 and on (40 years rather than 50). My bad, mental error
Bring back FFP!!!

Aughnanure

Quote from: augoman on August 21, 2012, 04:48:04 PM
certainly not the Wade of today, but I would the Wade of MU days.

No. Wade will go down as the greatest Marquette player of all-time. He already is. You can try to nitpick all you want because of how long he played for us. You can try, but no one is leaving him off the list of the top 5.
“All men dream; but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act out their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible.” - T.E. Lawrence

Dr. Blackheart

Calling Pudner (Bama)...if he wasn't so damn busy electing Presidents...from his book it is Bo, George, DW3, Butch and Dean.  I don't know where Jae would fit in statistically but I assume high. 

Chones would be up there but he left early let's face it.  My list from pure talent and impact is Bo, DW3, George, Mo and Dean.  Bo was a four year starter with two F2's and a NC.  George carried Al into his glory years. Mo may have been the best physical talent ever at MU.  It is heresy, but Butch was not all that gifted naturally but he could use his body so well.  Dean was the Baryshnikov.  No one had seen that quickness before.  I am very tempted to put Jae on the list over Butch.

4everwarriors

Nah, Butch was far better. FF MVP, Olympian, 1st round pick, DeWitt Clinton, etc. Remember seein' Butch run in a sweatsuit during hot, humid summer days up and down the street from the Old Gym on 16th to the Ave., sweatin' like a pig.
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

Sharpie

Don't really care about all of this. I just hope someone can help me find where I can get my hands on some cheap Louis Vuitton bags.

Wade for President

Quote from: morecowbell on August 22, 2012, 06:42:01 AM
Don't really care about all of this. I just hope someone can help me find where I can get my hands on some cheap Louis Vuitton bags.

+1,000,000!!!

Just awesome.

GGGG

Quote from: 4everwarriors on August 22, 2012, 04:40:48 AM
Nah, Butch was far better. FF MVP, Olympian, 1st round pick, DeWitt Clinton, etc. Remember seein' Butch run in a sweatsuit during hot, humid summer days up and down the street from the Old Gym on 16th to the Ave., sweatin' like a pig.


DWade was on a FF team, an Olympian (who actually won a medal), a first round pick, and he has been a far better player in the NBA than Lee was.

But I would not have Meminger ahead of Lee.

Lennys Tap

Dean Meminger was (by far) MU's best point guard of all time. Butch played the 2. My all time MU team:
PG - Meminger
SG - Wade
SF - Thompson
PF - Lucas
C  - Chones

Bench : Bo, Butch, Tatum, T Miller and Whitehead.

RJax55

Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on August 22, 2012, 07:55:56 AM

DWade was on a FF team, an Olympian (who actually won a medal), a first round pick, and he has been a far better player in the NBA than Lee was.

Dwade actually has two Olympic medals, bronze in '04 and gold in '08.

And, he is not just a far better NBA player than Lee... Honestly, there's no comparison between the two:

Wade is an 8-time All-Star, (2) NBA first-teams, (3) NBA second-teams, (2) NBA third-teams, an NBA scoring champion (2009), Finals MVP and 2-time NBA champion.

He is one of the NBA's best 50 players of all-time.

Aughnanure

How does Murray State rank ahead of ND, Oklahoma, Gonzaga, Xavier, Houston? What shitty point system are they using?
“All men dream; but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act out their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible.” - T.E. Lawrence

Bocephys


The Equalizer

Quote from: Aughnanure on August 22, 2012, 12:43:42 PM
How does Murray State rank ahead of ND, Oklahoma, Gonzaga, Xavier, Houston? What crapty point system are they using?

The scale gives a lot of weight to conference performance.

5 points for a conference title
3 points for a conference tournament title

Over the past 50 years:
Murray State has 22 conference titles and 14 conference tournament titles.

Comparing:

Xavier has 17 conference titles and 10 tournament championships. 
Gonzaga has 15 conference titles and 11 tournament championships
Oklahoma has 7 conference titles and 7 championships
Houston has 3 conference titles and 6 tournament championships
Notre Dame has no conference titles, and 1 tournament championship

BTW, MU has just 1 of each.

Benny B

But MU also has only a handful of losing seasons in the last 50 years, and a bunch of .800 or better seasons.

And MU will get the +5 & +3 credit for each of the years it finished ahead in the polls of two other major conference champions & conference tournament champions as an independent.  The 70s alone might be good enough for the equivalent of 8 "conference championships" and "conference tournament" titles in the point system.
Quote from: LittleMurs on January 08, 2015, 07:10:33 PM
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny.  Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.

The Equalizer

Quote from: Benny B on August 21, 2012, 12:29:04 PM
Without counting the bonus points for the independent years where MU finished higher than two other major conference teams, I'm coming up with 296 points.  The 70's account for roughly half of those points, however.

My guess is that MU is hovering right around #11 overall.


I'm coming up with 291, including the bonuses (which apply only for '71 and '76).  MU considers Wade, Meminger and Lee as our consensus 1st team AAs.  Not sure what constitutes 2nd team consensus--i included anyone that was 2nd team on at least one of the major lists, and excluded Helms Foundation and anyone who was only honorable mention. 

Points
15   Conference title - 5 points (3 1 for CUSA, plus 71 & 76)
9   Conference tournament title - 3 points (3--one for the GMC, plus 71 & 76)
   Win percentage 80%+ 4 points, 60-79% 2 points, 35-49 -2 points, >35% -4 points
40   80+ WP  (10 seasons)
50   60-79 WP (25 seasons)
-8   35-50 WP (4 seasons)
-8   <35 WP (2 seasons)
0   No. 1 seed - 2 points
27   NCAA tournament berth - 1 point
0   NCAA 1st-rd. win as 12-16-seed - 1 point
12   Losing in second round - 3 points
40   Sweet 16 loss - 5 pts
20   Elite Eight loss - 10 pts
15   National semifinal loss - 15 points
20   Title game loss - 20 points
25   National title - 25 points
1   NIT title - 1 point
9   First-team All-American - 3 points (Meminger, Lee, Wade)
20   Second-team All-American - 2 points (Not sure what is considered Consensus)
4   Player taken in NBA's top 10 - 2 points  (4 points)
291   TOTAL

Given that Princeton (#22) has 289 points, we should know soon enough--I may have missed a few, but I'm not sure we have enough to climb into the top 15.

dolly4512

With all due respect, if anyone thinks Wade is not the best player in school history, They are not watching the sport. Van gundy and mark Jackson named him as the third best two-guard of all time behind Jordan and Kobe.

Note: crowder would have to come off the bench. His stats and accolades are amazing.

Previous topic - Next topic