Main Menu
collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

Marquette vs Oklahoma by tower912
[Today at 10:18:34 AM]


Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by ATL MU Warrior
[Today at 10:13:51 AM]


Nov 28: MU vs OU in Chicago by Warrior of Law
[Today at 10:10:18 AM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by The Sultan
[Today at 09:36:19 AM]


Pearson to MU by willie warrior
[May 13, 2025, 06:07:05 PM]


Mid-season grades by Jay Bee
[May 13, 2025, 02:05:55 PM]


Kam update by MUbiz
[May 13, 2025, 01:53:14 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


Canned Goods n Ammo

Quote from: Lennys Tap on July 31, 2012, 11:15:50 PM
Rich/famous people are eccentric. The same behavior for the average guy means you're crazy.

Correct.

I'm not breaking new ground here.

Morgan brings a lot of energy and a spark, but he's eccentric enough that it doesn't work very well on a mediocre team.

Like I said before, if he was a little better this year, I bet some teams in the pennant race would have inquired about him. He's a pretty good role player for a team in contention.

The Process

Quote from: Guns n Ammo on July 31, 2012, 10:28:34 PM
I don't dislike Nyjer's antics, but when you are under .500, some of his stuff gets a little tiresome. Do you really want him standing on second doing "beast mode" after he hits a double when they are out of the pennant race? How about when they are down 7-0? That stuff only works when you are winning a lot of games.

Rodman's numbers look good in S.A., but he was a HUGE distraction. Put him on another winning team (the Bulls), and suddenly his antics don't look so bad. It's an extreme example, but on winning teams, eccentric behavior is far easier to deal with.

Well from the get-go Nyjer was different this year from last year with his antics.  I'm just saying that perhaps there's a correlation between his antics, how loose he's playing, and how well he's playing.  It's definitely time to thank him for his contributions last year and part ways.

Rodman was absolutely a distraction in SA - 100% agreed.
Relax. Respect the Process.

Canned Goods n Ammo

Quote from: CaptainAwesome on August 01, 2012, 12:10:01 PM
Well from the get-go Nyjer was different this year from last year with his antics.  I'm just saying that perhaps there's a correlation between his antics, how loose he's playing, and how well he's playing.  It's definitely time to thank him for his contributions last year and part ways.

Rodman was absolutely a distraction in SA - 100% agreed.

It's a chicken or the egg problem in the scenario you've described. He can't play well unless he's being a little reckless, but he can't be that vocal when he's playing poorly because he'll drive everybody crazy and alienate his teammates.

There could be something to that.

buckchuckler

Quote from: PTM on July 31, 2012, 09:16:58 AM


He won't command high caliber money this offseason.

God is that just stupid. 

buckchuckler

So as things have evened out during Hamilton's slump,

Hamilton has more HR than Braun
Hamilton has more RBI than Braun
Braun and Hamilton have the same amount of XBH
Braun has a better OPS
Braun has more steals
Braun has a better BA.


While each guy has some statistical advantages, they are right on top of each other. 
Both players are having seasons that should have them in the thick of MVP consideration.
I think I'm still saying they are both the same tier of player for sure. 
Josh Hamilton is still the most similar player to Braun statistically, according to Baseball Reference.


Spotcheck Billy

Quote from: MUFanatic4Life on July 31, 2012, 05:11:03 PM
Was watching the MLB Network, the Rangers were taking pregame BP and GM Jon Daniels was being interviewed. Interview was about Dempster acquisition but when Josh Hamilton walked past the camera and waved Daniels said "I would also like to break news on a Hamilton extension." Don't know the details of it yet.

he said that using teal

🏀

#281
Quote from: buckchuckler on August 01, 2012, 03:07:12 PM
God is that just stupid.  

You think he's getting Howard or Fielder money?

It ain't happening without team friendly opt-outs when it comes to substances and injuries.

MarsupialMadness

Are there any White Sox fans on this board? 

It looks like the south side of Chicago is in for an exciting finish once again this year.

buckchuckler

#283
Quote from: MarsupialMadness on August 01, 2012, 04:40:24 PM
Are there any White Sox fans on this board?  

It looks like the south side of Chicago is in for an exciting finish once again this year.

Here!  Love the moves Kenny has made.  He got a 3B, reliever and a starter, can't ask for more than that.  The extra starter should hopefully make Sale and Quintana more effective.  

What makes the moves even better is that the Sox didn't really give anything up.

buckchuckler

Quote from: PTM on August 01, 2012, 03:59:12 PM
You think he's getting Howard or Fielder money?

It ain't happening without team friendly opt-outs when it comes to substances and injuries.

He's a bit older, so I don't think he'll get the years, but I'd think an average salary of between 20-25 million is nearly a guarantee. 

🏀

Quote from: buckchuckler on August 01, 2012, 08:57:02 PM
He's a bit older, so I don't think he'll get the years, but I'd think an average salary of between 20-25 million is nearly a guarantee. 

No team is putting $20 million into him, not without huge out clauses.

jmayer1

Quote from: PTM on August 01, 2012, 09:47:21 PM
No team is putting $20 million into him, not without huge out clauses.

Yes they will. He won't get a ton of years, but will command a pretty high average annual salary. I could very well see him getting 5 years, 125 million. I mean if someone is stupid enough to give Howard that deal a few years before his contract was even up, Hamilton should command that--he's a much better player. Remember, it only takes 1 GM. I think you are overrating the fear baseball management has about his substance abuse issues.

Otule's Glass Eye

Quote from: Bocephys on August 01, 2012, 11:16:00 AM
And yet, I don't see anything about this 15 hours later...

Maybe he was joking, but he gave no indication he was. Saw on a Rangers blog that they were not sure either.  ?-(

MerrittsMustache

Quote from: PTM on August 01, 2012, 09:47:21 PM
No team is putting $20 million into him, not without huge out clauses.

Jayson Werth is getting $18M a year and his career has been statistically significant to former Brewer great Jeffery Hammonds. Hamilton will get a big money deal.


Benny B

Quote from: jmayer1 on August 01, 2012, 10:01:06 PM
Yes they will. He won't get a ton of years, but will command a pretty high average annual salary. I could very well see him getting 5 years, 125 million. I mean if someone is stupid enough to give Howard that deal a few years before his contract was even up, Hamilton should command that--he's a much better player. Remember, it only takes 1 GM. I think you are overrating the fear baseball management has about his substance abuse issues.

Players at the ML level are being drug- tested far more often today than they were when Hamilton was getting into trouble.  So if he does start the habit again, he'll likely be tested within a few months, fail, and be suspended.  And while he's suspended, there is no paycheck.  In other words, a GM who really wants Josh Hamilton isn't going to put much weight into his substance abuse issues... whatever they commit to him is going to effectively be contingent upon him staying clean.  The downside is that he relapses and you lose a player, but at least you're no longer obligated to pay his salary.

The biggest factors that are going to inhibit his chances of getting a long-term deal... he turns 32 next May, and power-hitting OF's aren't exactly scarce commodities.
Quote from: LittleMurs on January 08, 2015, 07:10:33 PM
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny.  Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.

GGGG

Hamilton is going to get a deal of about 5 yrs./$100M with a GM hoping to win a World Series in one of the first three years....knowing that 4 and 5 will probably be bad money.


GGGG

Yeah....I'm very likely wrong.

🏀

Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on August 02, 2012, 04:30:03 PM
Yeah....I'm very likely wrong.

I don't think he eclipses the $20m point, but he'll get close.

Benny B

Quote from: PTM on August 02, 2012, 04:49:06 PM
I don't think he eclipses the $20m point, but he'll get close.

Every time PTM makes a prediction, I look at his signature line and say... "that's great, but what does Titan think?"
Quote from: LittleMurs on January 08, 2015, 07:10:33 PM
Wow, I'm very concerned for Benny.  Being able to mimic Myron Medcalf's writing so closely implies an oncoming case of dementia.

jmayer1

#295
Quote from: PTM on August 02, 2012, 04:49:06 PM
I don't think he eclipses the $20m point, but he'll get close.

So you think he won't get $20 million, but he'll get close? Are you changing your prediction or just have a very narrow idea of what you think he'll get?

Sorry if that question came off di*kish, it wasn't meant to be.

🏀

Quote from: jmayer1 on August 02, 2012, 05:32:59 PM
So you think he won't get $20 million, but he'll get close? Are you changing your prediction or just have a very narrow idea of what you think he'll get?

Sorry if that question came off di*kish, it wasn't meant to be.

Didn't come off that way.

Not changing, I consider $20+ to be top-caliber money, and he's not there. I think someone will roll the dice and land him for $17-19.5m, but getting him at $20 and over will make GMs uneasy.

🏀

Quote from: Benny B on August 02, 2012, 04:53:20 PM
Every time PTM makes a prediction, I look at his signature line and say... "that's great, but what does Titan think?"

I wear a WWTT34D wristband.

buckchuckler

Quote from: PTM on August 02, 2012, 07:29:52 PM
Didn't come off that way.

Not changing, I consider $20+ to be top-caliber money, and he's not there. I think someone will roll the dice and land him for $17-19.5m, but getting him at $20 and over will make GMs uneasy.

OK so just to be clear, 20 is big time top caliber money, but 19.5 isn't?  Does that mean that Braun, who tops out at 19M between now and 2021, isn't a big time player; that is, if we are using 20M in salary as the judge? 

🏀

Quote from: buckchuckler on August 03, 2012, 01:39:17 AM
OK so just to be clear, 20 is big time top caliber money, but 19.5 isn't?  Does that mean that Braun, who tops out at 19M between now and 2021, isn't a big time player; that is, if we are using 20M in salary as the judge? 

Did I ever make a connection between talent and top caliber money? Nope.

Braun is one of the biggest steals in baseball.

Previous topic - Next topic