collapse

Resources

Stud of Georgetown Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

MU/Creighton Game Thread by MuggsyB
[Today at 01:26:25 AM]


Zaide Didn’t Travel With Team by The_Blaze
[Today at 01:05:46 AM]


How many guys stay? by WhiteTrash
[Today at 12:59:52 AM]


Ross Not Start? by MU82
[Today at 12:59:07 AM]


2025-26 College Hoops Thread by MU82
[Today at 12:58:20 AM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by Norm
[Today at 12:30:05 AM]


A question for the Scoop elders by BLWarrior91
[Today at 12:27:36 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Seton Hall

Marquette
63
Marquette vs
Seton Hall
Date/Time: Dec 30, 2025, 6:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Creighton
84

CrackedSidewalksSays

S-Curve: Feb 24

Written by: noreply@blogger.com (Alan Bykowski)

The past few days, I've been noticing that everyone seems to be far higher on Michigan than I was. I initially felt they were being overrated, but as I saw them turning up on the 2 and 3 line in many brackets, I took a closer look at their profile, and realized that I was probably underrating them. Rather than simply giving Michigan a bump, I scrapped my old data and completely redid my bracket projection today. Rather than posting a bracket, for the time-being, I decided to use an S-Curve, as it prevented me from having to move teams up or down seed lines for match-up purposes, and at this point shows a more accurate depiction of where teams should be rated. Here's the current S-Curve:





First Four Out: Dayton, UCF, Miami, Minnesota
Next Four Out: NC State, Washington, St. Joseph's, South Florida

[color=red;">Red][color=black;">][/color]
[color=red;">Purple][color=white;">][/color][/color][/color]
[color=red;">Green][color=white;">][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color]
[color=red;">Orange][color=white;">][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color]

[color=red;"> In][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color]

[color=red;">For][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color]

[color=red;">At][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color]

[color=red;">Finally,][/color] [/color][/color] [/color][/color][/color][/color]

http://www.crackedsidewalks.com/2012/02/s-curve-feb-24.html

mugrad2006

This is great.  As much as I want MU to be a 2 seed, it's really hard to put them above anyone on the S-Curve right now.  Michigan is their best option to leap, but that still leaves them below Duke, OSU, and others. 

The flip side is they're in a really good position to maintain the 3 even if they have a couple more losses between now and selection Sunday.

JamilJaeJamailJrJuan

I disagree on Michigan. Sure they've beat OSU and MSU, but they've lost to them as well. They're a good team 12-16 range, but they aren't the 9th best team in country. No wayyyy.
Quote from: Goose on February 09, 2017, 11:06:04 AM
I would take the Rick SLU program right now.

statnik

Quote from: JamilJaeJamailJrJuan on February 24, 2012, 06:14:01 PM
I disagree on Michigan. Sure they've beat OSU and MSU, but they've lost to them as well. They're a good team 12-16 range, but they aren't the 9th best team in country. No wayyyy.

I agree.  With seven losses (including Iowa and Arkansas, average major conference teams at best), and a relative dearth of good wins in the non conference season, I don't think they deserve to be top 10.

wardle2wade

Quote from: CrackedSidewalksSays on February 24, 2012, 05:00:05 PM
S-Curve: Feb 24

Written by: noreply@blogger.com (Alan Bykowski)

The past few days, I've been noticing that everyone seems to be far higher on Michigan than I was. I initially felt they were being overrated, but as I saw them turning up on the 2 and 3 line in many brackets, I took a closer look at their profile, and realized that I was probably underrating them. Rather than simply giving Michigan a bump, I scrapped my old data and completely redid my bracket projection today. Rather than posting a bracket, for the time-being, I decided to use an S-Curve, as it prevented me from having to move teams up or down seed lines for match-up purposes, and at this point shows a more accurate depiction of where teams should be rated. Here's the current S-Curve:





First Four Out: Dayton, UCF, Miami, Minnesota
Next Four Out: NC State, Washington, St. Joseph's, South Florida

[color=red;">Red][color=black;">][/color]
[color=red;"><span][color=black;"><span][color=#d9d2e9;">Purple][color=white;">][/color][/color][/color]
[color=red;"><span][color=black;"><span][color=#d9d2e9;"><span][color=white;"><span][color=#b6d7a8;">Green][color=white;">][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color]
[color=red;"><span][color=black;"><span][color=#d9d2e9;"><span][color=white;"><span][color=#b6d7a8;"><span][color=white;"><span][color=#f9cb9c;">Orange][color=white;">][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color]

[color=red;"><span][color=black;"><span][color=#d9d2e9;"><span][color=white;"><span][color=#b6d7a8;"><span][color=white;"><span][color=#f9cb9c;"><span][color=white;"> In][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color]

[color=red;"><span][color=black;"><span][color=#d9d2e9;"><span][color=white;"><span][color=#b6d7a8;"><span][color=white;"><span][color=#f9cb9c;"><span][color=white;">For][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color]

[color=red;"><span][color=black;"><span][color=#d9d2e9;"><span][color=white;"><span][color=#b6d7a8;"><span][color=white;"><span][color=#f9cb9c;"><span][color=white;">At][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color][/color]

[color=red;"><span][color=black;"><span][color=#d9d2e9;"><span][color=white;"><span][color=#b6d7a8;"><span][color=white;"><span][color=#f9cb9c;"><span][color=white;">Finally,][/color] [/color][/color] [/color][/color][/color][/color]

http://www.crackedsidewalks.com/2012/02/s-curve-feb-24.html

I know there's a lot of work behind this, but I can't believe that any field still has the Illini in.  I'd be absolutely shocked if the committee puts them in at this point.

brewcity77

Quote from: JamilJaeJamailJrJuan on February 24, 2012, 06:14:01 PMI disagree on Michigan. Sure they've beat OSU and MSU, but they've lost to them as well. They're a good team 12-16 range, but they aren't the 9th best team in country. No wayyyy.

I felt the same way on Michigan, but consider this:

  • They are one of only 5 teams in the country with 8 top-50 wins
  • They have as many top-20 wins as Syracuse, Kentucky, or Missouri, and more than North Carolina, Marquette, Baylor, and Georgetown combined
  • Their worst loss is to Iowa, a team that has 4 top-25 wins.
.
I was thinking they were a 5-6 seed, but when you match them up to the rest of the field, there's no way you can line them up against teams like Louisville, Vandy, FSU, and Wisconsin and keep a straight face.

brewcity77

Quote from: wardle2wade on February 24, 2012, 07:05:35 PMI know there's a lot of work behind this, but I can't believe that any field still has the Illini in.  I'd be absolutely shocked if the committee puts them in at this point.

I had the Illini out the last bracket I did, didn't even have them in the last 8. But when you look at their quality wins compared to their only bad loss, they're hard to keep out. They still have a good resume, even if they're in the process of throwing up on their shoes.

Previous topic - Next topic