collapse

Resources

Stud of Georgetown Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

A question for the Scoop elders by MU82
[Today at 12:37:52 AM]


Marquette Team Rankings by PointWarrior
[Today at 12:06:45 AM]


Ross Not Start? by MuggsyB
[December 21, 2025, 11:32:54 PM]


Zaide Didn’t Travel With Team by mileskishnish72
[December 21, 2025, 11:05:45 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by Jables1604
[December 21, 2025, 06:52:56 PM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by MU82
[December 21, 2025, 06:30:05 PM]


What would make you show Shaka the door in March? by WhiteTrash
[December 21, 2025, 06:25:38 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Seton Hall

Marquette
63
Marquette vs
Seton Hall
Date/Time: Dec 30, 2025, 6:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Creighton
84

ecompt

How do one-and-dones affect the rate the NCAA uses for graduating players? It seems vague that a team could lose a one-and-done but not have its rate affected if the student "is in good academic standing." What exactly does that mean, and couldn't a school find a way around it?

Silkk the Shaka

Quote from: ecompt on February 23, 2012, 11:04:43 AM
How do one-and-dones affect the rate the NCAA uses for graduating players? It seems vague that a team could lose a one-and-done but not have its rate affected if the student "is in good academic standing." What exactly does that mean, and couldn't a school find a way around it?

Pretty sure it means had they stayed, they would have been academically eligible to play the next semester.  I guess a school could get around it by falsifying grades?  Probably not worth it.

boyonthedock

you need your one and done to finish up his second semester and pass finals and such.

Skitch

I could be wrong but I believe that as long as you would have had sophomore standing academically the next fall you don't negatively affect the graduation rate.

Windyplayer

Quote from: boyonthedock on February 23, 2012, 03:39:52 PM
you need your one and done to finish up his second semester and pass finals and such.
Conclusion?

bilsu

A player that transfers does not count against you, if he leaves in good academic standing That is why you see MU refusing to release players until they have completed the semester.

NCAARules

OK - you've got a couple of different things working here...

First - the "Graduation Rate" aka the IPEDS rate, looks at graduation rate for athletics as this: Of those first-time, full-time freshmen who received athletic aid in their first year, how many graduated from that institution within 6 years? This rate means you get no credit (or 0/1) for a student who transfers out, regardless of standing when they leave. It also means you get no boost for bringing a transfer in and having them graduate. Walk-ons are also excluded (no athletic aid).

Because the IPEDS rate was so misunderstood, the NCAA developed its own metrics to better describe how student-athletes are performing. At the Division I level, that metric is the APR. The APR asks these questions: of all the student-athletes on the team, how many were academically eligible to return and compete the next semester, and how many chose to return? (each athlete can earn two points per term, for a total of four per year). So it looks at eligibility and retention, which are two key indicators for academic success of student-athletes. The NCAA does allow for adjustments for transfer-outs and departing pros, as long as they leave with a sufficiently high GPA (not sure what the exact number is).

I don't know if that answers your question, but it was fun putting on my compliance hat for a little while.

Previous topic - Next topic