collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 9/15/25 by jfp61
[Today at 09:58:15 AM]


2025-26 Schedule by The Sultan
[Today at 09:50:11 AM]


Roll Call / Planning - Nov 9 vs. I4 at United Center, Chicago by barfolomew
[September 08, 2025, 11:54:41 AM]


Closed scrimmages by DefinitelyNotPorterMoser
[September 08, 2025, 08:37:50 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

Sir Lawrence

The NCAA released its latest "Academic Progress Rates" yesterday, and Marquette's Mens BB team scored a 927, which means it's just over the number that the NCAA wants it to hit--a 925.  This study is for the last
three academic years (through 05-06). 

In a nutshell:

"Each scholarship player on each team generally can earn two APR points per semester for remaining at the school and academically eligible, and the NCAA has determined that teams should hit 92.5% of their possible total — an APR of 925 — or face the initial scholarship sanctions. A 925 roughly projects a 60% graduation rate."

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/2007-05-02-apr-rates_N.htm

By comparison, Cincinnati scored a 838, and will lose a scholarship for mens BB.  UW-Madison scored a 916.  ND scored a 977.  (Edit:  UWM scored a 916.   UW-Madison scored 931)

Here's Marquette's report:  http://web1.ncaa.org/app_data/apr2006/387_2006_apr.pdf

Our track teams, golf team, etc. were praised for high rates (golf 1000, women's volleyball 1000)

This is serious stuff, as I believe the crackdown will be stricter, and scholarships at stake--or what the NCAA calls "scholarship reduction."

Full report by school (drop down boxes) found here:  (EDIT: IGNORE THIS LINK)http://web1.ncaa.org/app_data/apr2006/387_2006_apr.pdf
Ludum habemus.

spartan3186

you posted the same link twice. do you have the link for the all NCAA report?

Sir Lawrence

#2
Sorry about that--this should work:

http://www.ncaa.org/wps/portal

and then drill down--I tried a direct link, but it's strangely long.
Ludum habemus.

Mayor McCheese

so is Bucky losing a scholarship?
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/NCAA/dayone&sportCat=ncb

pure genius stuff by Bill Simmons, remember to read day 2

77ncaachamps

I think they scored higher than we did, at least for men's bb.

I guess those transfers REALLY hurt us...
SS Marquette

bma725

Quote from: Mayor McCheese on May 02, 2007, 11:54:13 PM
so is Bucky losing a scholarship?

The information in the post is wrong, UW-Madison had a 931.  It was UWM that had a 916, and no they aren't losing a scholarship.

Sir Lawrence

Quote from: bma725 on May 03, 2007, 12:31:14 AM
Quote from: Mayor McCheese on May 02, 2007, 11:54:13 PM
so is Bucky losing a scholarship?

The information in the post is wrong, UW-Madison had a 931.  It was UWM that had a 916, and no they aren't losing a scholarship.

Sorry again--very sloppy posting on my part  It's UWM, and they aren't losing a scholarship this year, but they could if they don't get their act together. 

The Journal Sentinel has an article about this whole APR thing in today's paper:

http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=600542

The headline:

UWM just passes NCAA test
Statistical adjustment helps prevent sanctions


Ludum habemus.

ChicosBailBonds


muwarrior87

so does this take into account transfers?

Previous topic - Next topic