collapse

Resources

Stud of Creighton Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

A question for the Scoop elders by Silkk the Shaka
[Today at 02:53:15 PM]


What would make you show Shaka the door in March? by Viper
[Today at 02:46:54 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by tower912
[Today at 02:26:51 PM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by Shooter McGavin
[Today at 01:50:21 PM]


Top 50 HS Basketball recruits vs the Portal by panda
[Today at 01:03:17 PM]


How many guys stay? by panda
[Today at 12:58:59 PM]


Zaide Didn’t Travel With Team by jfp61
[Today at 11:55:50 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Seton Hall

Marquette
63
Marquette vs
Seton Hall
Date/Time: Dec 30, 2025, 6:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Creighton
84

Sir Lawrence

The NCAA released its latest "Academic Progress Rates" yesterday, and Marquette's Mens BB team scored a 927, which means it's just over the number that the NCAA wants it to hit--a 925.  This study is for the last
three academic years (through 05-06). 

In a nutshell:

"Each scholarship player on each team generally can earn two APR points per semester for remaining at the school and academically eligible, and the NCAA has determined that teams should hit 92.5% of their possible total — an APR of 925 — or face the initial scholarship sanctions. A 925 roughly projects a 60% graduation rate."

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/2007-05-02-apr-rates_N.htm

By comparison, Cincinnati scored a 838, and will lose a scholarship for mens BB.  UW-Madison scored a 916.  ND scored a 977.  (Edit:  UWM scored a 916.   UW-Madison scored 931)

Here's Marquette's report:  http://web1.ncaa.org/app_data/apr2006/387_2006_apr.pdf

Our track teams, golf team, etc. were praised for high rates (golf 1000, women's volleyball 1000)

This is serious stuff, as I believe the crackdown will be stricter, and scholarships at stake--or what the NCAA calls "scholarship reduction."

Full report by school (drop down boxes) found here:  (EDIT: IGNORE THIS LINK)http://web1.ncaa.org/app_data/apr2006/387_2006_apr.pdf
Ludum habemus.

spartan3186

you posted the same link twice. do you have the link for the all NCAA report?

Sir Lawrence

#2
Sorry about that--this should work:

http://www.ncaa.org/wps/portal

and then drill down--I tried a direct link, but it's strangely long.
Ludum habemus.

Mayor McCheese

so is Bucky losing a scholarship?
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/NCAA/dayone&sportCat=ncb

pure genius stuff by Bill Simmons, remember to read day 2

77ncaachamps

I think they scored higher than we did, at least for men's bb.

I guess those transfers REALLY hurt us...
SS Marquette

bma725

Quote from: Mayor McCheese on May 02, 2007, 11:54:13 PM
so is Bucky losing a scholarship?

The information in the post is wrong, UW-Madison had a 931.  It was UWM that had a 916, and no they aren't losing a scholarship.

Sir Lawrence

Quote from: bma725 on May 03, 2007, 12:31:14 AM
Quote from: Mayor McCheese on May 02, 2007, 11:54:13 PM
so is Bucky losing a scholarship?

The information in the post is wrong, UW-Madison had a 931.  It was UWM that had a 916, and no they aren't losing a scholarship.

Sorry again--very sloppy posting on my part  It's UWM, and they aren't losing a scholarship this year, but they could if they don't get their act together. 

The Journal Sentinel has an article about this whole APR thing in today's paper:

http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=600542

The headline:

UWM just passes NCAA test
Statistical adjustment helps prevent sanctions


Ludum habemus.

ChicosBailBonds


muwarrior87

so does this take into account transfers?

Previous topic - Next topic