collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Pearson to MU by TAMU, Knower of Ball
[July 12, 2025, 11:39:51 PM]


Marquette freshmen at Goolsby's 7/12 by MuMark
[July 12, 2025, 09:44:22 PM]


Recruiting as of 7/15/25 by MuMark
[July 12, 2025, 07:09:07 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by MuggsyB
[July 12, 2025, 08:06:27 AM]


Nash Walker commits to MU by Captain Quette
[July 11, 2025, 02:40:11 PM]


Congrats to Royce by tower912
[July 10, 2025, 09:00:17 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

4everwarriors

"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

MerrittsMustache

UW looks like they're playing in the 1950s.

UNC looks like they're playing in the Rec Center.


MUMac

Looking at the score, it seems like a really long first half.

RyanConroy

Two very bad shots for UW in a row. If there was a time to slow the game down and take the crowd out of it, it was during those two possessions.

MattyWarrior

Can't beleive Wisco is this good.

Skatastrophy

Quote from: HOOP24/7 on November 30, 2011, 10:01:51 PM
Can't beleive Wisco is this good.

They have 38 points... in the 2nd half.

jsglow

Win or lose tonight, Bucky is good.  So that'll mean that beating them will be a significant victory for our Warriors.  We had better come with our 'A' game.

NersEllenson

Wisconsin has played their usual tough game...but it appears they have tired...and that is not surprising given the disparity in depth/athleticism between they and UNC. Jordan Taylor missed 2 FT's, some shots coming up short - just looks like there is not a lot left in their tank.

Hopefully MU can use their depth and athleticism to wear UW down in a similar fashion..
"I'm not sure Cadougan would fix the problems on this team. I'm not even convinced he would be better for this team than DeWil is."

BrewCity77, December 8, 2013

rocky_warrior

Quote from: 4everwarriors on November 30, 2011, 09:51:26 PM
'cuz Bucky's damn impressive.

I'm looking, and at this point UNC is beating Bucky by scoring 20% more points.

Canned Goods n Ammo

I think it's really just going to come down to defensive rebounding for MU.

I think UW is a little thin and you can wear them down, but they will use all 35 seconds per possession, so you have to close out and break out if you want to get the number of possessions up (like MU wants to).

nycwarrior

Wisco is really good when they're passing the ball and isolating guys for three-dribble drives to the hoop.

If we can keep it really close, avoid stupid fouls and get some opportunistic fast breaks, we may be able to wear them down.

They really play good d.

karavotsos

I wish I hadn't looked.

I now know what UW basketball is good for.  If anyone watches The Office, in the Halloween episode Gabe played that disturbing short film of blood, and roaches, and old people.  David Lynch did that -- film of worms crawling through mud, and other things that just make you uncomfortable.  Clips of UW basketball would be perfect for that kind of thing.  

Any film students who read this board can thank me.

NersEllenson

What's up with these big goons from Minnesota that shoot with weird form like Leuer and Bergren??  Any else notice the similarities in their awkward jump shot form?  (And haircuts?)

;D
"I'm not sure Cadougan would fix the problems on this team. I'm not even convinced he would be better for this team than DeWil is."

BrewCity77, December 8, 2013

Markusquette

Quote from: Ners on November 30, 2011, 10:26:44 PM
What's up with these big goons from Minnesota that shoot with weird form like Leuer and Bergren??  Any else notice the similarities in their awkward jump shot form?  (And haircuts?)

;D

They all must be related.

cj111

Quote from: Jamil_toMU10 on November 30, 2011, 10:34:08 PM
They all must be related.

They all have the same barber at least.   Seriously, every barber shop in Madison should be closed immediately for letting that out on the streets.

MountainCreekHouse

Marquette might get blown out. I'm having second thoughts about buying tickets...Go Marquette
Farva:"Give me six Schlitzes."
O'Hagan: "Take it easy, Rod."
Farva: "Open bar, dude!"

MerrittsMustache

If MU also shoots 24 FTs to Wisco's 6, it will be a very fun Saturday afternoon.

GGGG

You people who think that UW isn't athletic have no idea what you are talking about.

denverMU

Quote
Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on November 30, 2011, 10:51:46 PM
You people who think that UW isn't athletic have no idea what you are talking about.

Thank you!

We R Final Four

Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on November 30, 2011, 10:51:46 PM
You people who think that UW isn't athletic have no idea what you are talking about.
Sultan--who are 'you people'? Who on this thread said that UW isn't athletic to warrant that statement?  We certainly heard it enough times from Bilas tonight--now on here as well.  We get it.  They are much more athletic than given credit.

GGGG

#20
Not in this thread but I hear how MU's athleticism is the key to winning. It isn't. This UW team is damn athletic and played UNC much better than MU did. UW shot terribly and still only lost by a couple possessions. They are good.

Let me also add, I was watching the game with the sound down.  I never heard Bilas go on about it.

Brewtown Andy

Twitter - @brewtownandy
Anonymous Eagle

nyg

Wisconsin shot 8 for 28 from three point land (28%). They were outrebounded 39 to 26, many of which were off of the three point misses, and only lost by three points or one three point field basket. 

The real reason the game was so close was Wisconsin's defense which caused 14 UNC turnovers, while UW had only four.  Jordan Taylor was impressive running that team.

Never seen that Brust kid play before, but he is alot better than I thought.  Same with Bergeron having the bigman skills he has.  MU will have its handful with them.

You can talk about the defensive matchups, but with Buzz's substitution system, where no five players play more than three minutes together, the defensive assignments will change each time.

Look forward to watching the game and see what MU has.....

CTWarrior

Quote from: 2002MUalum on November 30, 2011, 10:19:32 PM
I think it's really just going to come down to defensive rebounding for MU.

I hope not, because if it does, we lose.  We've got force tempo, get some run outs when we do grab the defensive boards, and try to wear them down with numbers.
Calvin:  I'm a genius.  But I'm a misunderstood genius. 
Hobbes:  What's misunderstood about you?
Calvin:  Nobody thinks I'm a genius.

ATL MU Warrior

I only saw the first half so this is based on only that part of the game:

UNC did nothing to try to dictate tempo.  Nothing.  They were content to let UW run offense and pass the ball around the perimeter for 25-30 seconds with minimal defensive pressure.  MU has to apply extensive on ball pressure to try to disrupt UW's flow/rhythm and increase the pace of the game.  If we don't do this, we will lose because they will shoot much better at home.

UNC looked lethargic with the ball and did not protect it very well, leading to lots of stupid turnovers.  We need to protect the ball.

UNC had several instances where they used their guards' superior athleticism to get into the lane for easy baskets, but they didn't do this nearly enough.  They attacked the interior by feeding the post but their big guys were terrible offensively last night.  We need to use our athleticism and depth at the guard/wing position to ATTACK the basket on every possesion.  This will lead to easy baskets, fouls, open looks from three.  If we don't attack at every opportunity, we will lose.  

Previous topic - Next topic