Main Menu
collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

MU/Nova Game Thread by NCMUFan
[Today at 11:55:04 AM]


That Hurt. A lot. by Billy Hoyle
[Today at 11:46:49 AM]


2026 Transfer Portal Wishlist by wadesworld
[Today at 11:33:50 AM]


Shaka cost us the game tonite by tower912
[Today at 11:33:01 AM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by Scoop Snoop
[Today at 11:00:04 AM]


Marquette Team Rankings by Scoop Snoop
[Today at 10:56:38 AM]


Recruiting as of 1/15/26 by MuMark
[Today at 10:30:58 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


JWags85

Quote from: BM1090 on February 04, 2026, 01:26:26 PMI was thinking about this too. On the other hand, I do think it's infinitely better in it's current state than it was a few years ago. In a few years I'm hopeful we'll get to the point where it's pretty seamless and useful like it is in tennis.

I think its gotten better due to technology being more precise, but the issue that makes it unwatchable, and I don't think can be fixed without specific rule changes around it, is the "judgement call" aspect.  Offsides reviews could be seamless and useful quickly.  But when they allow either the ref or the video assistant to track back as far as they deem relevant, it gets cumbersome and stupid.

I watched a random match on Peacock in December, can't recall which.  Counter attack, really nice passing, great goal.  VAR pops up.  Commentators couldn't figure out why, all attackers were aside by a mile, acres of space on the attack with no challenges.  Turns out there was a "foul" on the change of possession, but not just on the change...the LB tackled an attacker, ball went to another attacking midfielder, who moved to the center for a dribble or two and then got stripped, which ignited the counter attack.  But that LB tackle, that the ref didn't even look twice at, was suddenly deemed beyond the pale in super slow-mo ruling out a goal almost a minute later. 

Pakuni

Quote from: JWags85 on February 04, 2026, 03:50:36 PMI think its gotten better due to technology being more precise, but the issue that makes it unwatchable, and I don't think can be fixed without specific rule changes around it, is the "judgement call" aspect.  Offsides reviews could be seamless and useful quickly.  But when they allow either the ref or the video assistant to track back as far as they deem relevant, it gets cumbersome and stupid.

I watched a random match on Peacock in December, can't recall which.  Counter attack, really nice passing, great goal.  VAR pops up.  Commentators couldn't figure out why, all attackers were aside by a mile, acres of space on the attack with no challenges.  Turns out there was a "foul" on the change of possession, but not just on the change...the LB tackled an attacker, ball went to another attacking midfielder, who moved to the center for a dribble or two and then got stripped, which ignited the counter attack.  But that LB tackle, that the ref didn't even look twice at, was suddenly deemed beyond the pale in super slow-mo ruling out a goal almost a minute later. 

Yep.
It's akin to overturning a touchdown because an offensive tackle got away with holding five players earlier on the drive.

Its DJOver

Was known to be coming but the HEX is officially dead. 

New format looks stupid too, you can qualify without even playing Mexico or Canada. Have to finish top 2 in a 4 team group made up of (in theory) the top 24 teams from CONCACAF to make it to the final stage where you again have to finish top 2 in a 4 team group made up of (in theory) the top 12 teams from CONCACAF.
Scoop motto:
Quote from: ATL MU Warrior on February 06, 2025, 06:04:29 PMthe stats bear that out, but

Its DJOver

Who do Spurs even target?
Scoop motto:
Quote from: ATL MU Warrior on February 06, 2025, 06:04:29 PMthe stats bear that out, but

Pakuni

Quote from: Its DJOver on Today at 10:05:00 AMWho do Spurs even target?

Roberto De Zerbi parted ways with Marseilles today. Probably not a coincidence.

JWags85

Quote from: Pakuni on Today at 10:49:07 AMRoberto De Zerbi parted ways with Marseilles today. Probably not a coincidence.

Bingo.  Cause you don't sack a manager who finished 2nd last year and currently sits in 4th just because the Champions League performance was disappointing...at a club that hasn't reached the knockout stage in 15 years.

Be interesting to see Thomas Frank's progression from here.  I don't recall his salary at Brentford, but I'm sure the $8MM he was getting from Spurs was at least triple what he was making.  So that, plus the payout he'll now get makes it worth it always.

Reputationally, he should be fine, as top level football manager roles are very mercurial and its totally a fit thing.  But you'd hope he doesn't go the way of Graham Potter whose career imploded after he failed at Chelsea (great at Brighton, bad at Chelsea, terrible at West Ham, not good now for Sweden) or even more apt, the complete derailing of Big Ange's career.

Previous topic - Next topic