Main Menu
collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

2025-26 Schedule by Mr. Nielsen
[Today at 04:09:13 PM]


Any Updates On Men's Basketball Practice Facility Funding? by TedBaxter
[September 12, 2025, 03:22:21 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

whodem

Quote from: lurch91 on March 17, 2011, 07:04:04 PM
Holy #$@%^!  How can Badger fans enjoy this????

Badgers are 5-12 on FG's so far in the first half.  At this rate they MIGHT end the first half with less than 15 FG attempts.

I have got to find my wife's knitting needles so I can poke out my eyes.

They win.

brewcity77

Quote from: lurch91 on March 17, 2011, 07:04:04 PM
Holy #$@%^!  How can Badger fans enjoy this????

Badgers are 5-12 on FG's so far in the first half.  At this rate they MIGHT end the first half with less than 15 FG attempts.

I have got to find my wife's knitting needles so I can poke out my eyes.

I agree, they are an awful team to watch. What I find funny is all the announcers talking about how good they are defensively. But they aren't good defensively. They're about on par with Marquette, and we are definitely not a good defensive team. But because they play so damn slow and end up in low scoring contests as a result, everyone is convinced they are good on defense. #64 in the country is NOT good on defense, especially when you are in a tournament that should feature the 68 best teams in the country (theoretically).

JamilJaeJamailJrJuan

Quote from: willie wampum on March 17, 2011, 07:19:51 PM
So Wisconsin is painful to watch.  If they win, at least their fans get to celebrate a victory.

If MU's athleticism leads to a loss tomorrow, what good did being aesthetically pleasing get them?

Give me an NCAA win and I'm happy, regardless of how painful the game was to watch.

I'll never understand the bitching about how Wisconsin plays, when they've achieved much more than MU in recent years.

Be a Badger fan then you negative Nancy.
Quote from: Goose on February 09, 2017, 11:06:04 AM
I would take the Rick SLU program right now.

MUMac

Quote from: willie wampum on March 17, 2011, 07:19:51 PM
So Wisconsin is painful to watch.  If they win, at least their fans get to celebrate a victory.

If MU's athleticism leads to a loss tomorrow, what good did being aesthetically pleasing get them?

Give me an NCAA win and I'm happy, regardless of how painful the game was to watch.

I'll never understand the bitching about how Wisconsin plays, when they've achieved much more than MU in recent years.

If calling UW difficult to watch is "bitching", what should we call your constant drumbeat against MU?  "Bitching" would be FAR too soft a word.

willie wampum

Quote from: MUMac on March 17, 2011, 07:56:19 PM
If calling UW difficult to watch is "bitching", what should we call your constant drumbeat against MU?  "Bitching" would be FAR too soft a word.

You can call it being realistic.

MU was a .500 team in conference play and finished in 11th place.

That pales in comparison to what UW achieved and they also appear comfortably poised to win their first round NCAA game.

Give me those "traditional" ballplayers who have the high BB IQ over someone who thinks going 1 on 3 on a fast break is a smart play, or over a guy who refuses to run out the clock with a lead and instead tries to drive in for a contested layup and helps lead MU to a loss that carried over for the rest of the season.




MUMac

Quote from: willie wampum on March 17, 2011, 08:10:02 PM
You can call it being realistic.

MU was a .500 team in conference play and finished in 11th place.

That pales in comparison to what UW achieved and they also appear comfortably poised to win their first round NCAA game.

Give me those "traditional" ballplayers who have the high BB IQ over someone who thinks going 1 on 3 on a fast break is a smart play, or over a guy who refuses to run out the clock with a lead and instead tries to drive in for a contested layup and helps lead MU to a loss that carried over for the rest of the season.





Nah, that's bitching.  

karavotsos

Refs protecting Wisconsin players like they're their virgin daughters.

whodem

Quote from: karavotsos on March 17, 2011, 08:16:31 PM
Refs protecting Wisconsin players like they're their virgin daughters.

What game are you watching? ?-(

UW is up by 16 right now so it wouldn't matter anyways.

whodem

Quote from: brewcity77 on March 17, 2011, 07:31:17 PM
I agree, they are an awful team to watch. What I find funny is all the announcers talking about how good they are defensively. But they aren't good defensively. They're about on par with Marquette, and we are definitely not a good defensive team. But because they play so damn slow and end up in low scoring contests as a result, everyone is convinced they are good on defense. #64 in the country is NOT good on defense, especially when you are in a tournament that should feature the 68 best teams in the country (theoretically).

I agree completely. They aren't a good defensive team this year. The reason though that they're still a really good team is because they're better then usual on offense mainly because Taylor has taken his game to another level.

WarriorHal

Speaking of Taylor, is he NBA bound or will MU have to deal with him again next season as a senior?

whodem

Quote from: WarriorHal on March 17, 2011, 08:39:06 PM
Speaking of Taylor, is he NBA bound or will MU have to deal with him again next season as a senior?

He's a lock to come back.

MUMac

Quote from: WarriorHal on March 17, 2011, 08:39:06 PM
Speaking of Taylor, is he NBA bound or will MU have to deal with him again next season as a senior?

Been wondering this for the past month, myself.  I would expect that he will put his name in to get the feedback.  I would guess it depends upon what he hears from the NBA.

Lennys Tap

Quote from: JamilJaeJamailJrJuan on March 17, 2011, 05:51:33 PM
Tough way to go out. Terrible play there to end it thought. Didn't even get a shot off when they had three seconds from half court.

Didn't get a shot off in either of their last two possessions. Totally disorganized.

brewcity77

Quote from: WarriorHal on March 17, 2011, 08:39:06 PMSpeaking of Taylor, is he NBA bound or will MU have to deal with him again next season as a senior?

I think he goes. He has a decent chance of being a first round pick and his stock will never be higher. Staying makes no sense for him.

whodem

#64
Quote from: brewcity77 on March 17, 2011, 08:43:06 PM
I think he goes. He has a decent chance of being a first round pick and his stock will never be higher. Staying makes no sense for him.

What makes you think he'll have a chance to be a 1st round pick?

EDIT: Especially since a lot of people think there is a chance he won't be drafted at all.

karavotsos

Quote from: whodem on March 17, 2011, 08:25:22 PM
What game are you watching? ?-(

UW is up by 16 right now so it wouldn't matter anyways.

The game in which they were calling handchecks on the perimeter that were unwarranted.  Fouls whenever a Belmont player slapped at the ball.  Fouls on guys fighting through screens.  A missed charge call on Taylor at the end of the first half and Leuer in the second half.  Both at big times.

And Belmont was not what the national media promised.  They stunk.  I feel cheated on that game.

MUMac

Quote from: karavotsos on March 17, 2011, 08:48:20 PM
A missed charge call on Taylor at the end of the first half and Leuer in the second half.  



On Taylor's play, the defender came off his man and was under the basket.  That is the rule change they made last year.  I don't like it, because each official interprets it differently.  I wish they would have the dotted line that the NBA uses.  That would make it more consistent and also take some of the confussion away from the fans on those calls.

brewcity77

Quote from: whodem on March 17, 2011, 08:47:23 PMWhat makes you think he'll have a chance to be a 1st round pick?

Production. He may not be as quick as a guy like Walker, but he has great range and is arguably the safest ball-handler in the country (his TO rate is 2nd in the nation to Crowder, but he's a point). He's not as long as you'd like, but once you get to the latter half of the first round, teams are usually only looking for developers and backups. Taylor could be a decent backup for a playoff team with his ability to shoot off the bench and smartly manage a game. And smart is his main attribute. He knows the game and plays it the right way. He won't beat his own team. And considering how good he's been this year, does he want to risk the possible drop in his stock without having Leuer as a safety valve?

whodem

Quote from: brewcity77 on March 17, 2011, 08:56:55 PM
Production. He may not be as quick as a guy like Walker, but he has great range and is arguably the safest ball-handler in the country (his TO rate is 2nd in the nation to Crowder, but he's a point). He's not as long as you'd like, but once you get to the latter half of the first round, teams are usually only looking for developers and backups. Taylor could be a decent backup for a playoff team with his ability to shoot off the bench and smartly manage a game. And smart is his main attribute. He knows the game and plays it the right way. He won't beat his own team. And considering how good he's been this year, does he want to risk the possible drop in his stock without having Leuer as a safety valve?

Point well made, but I don't think his stock will drop at all even without a guy like Leuer there mainly because his stock still isn't high anyways. The guy even with a great year is projected to be a late 2nd round to undrafted pick. A majority of NBA teams see the guy as a lifelong backup PG, and the NBA would rather have a guy that could be great rather then a guy who's already proven to be a solid player. This is one of the biggest reasons NBA teams miss on so many guys. They draft almost completely based on potential and that's why you guys like Favors picked in the top 5.

karavotsos

Quote from: MUMac on March 17, 2011, 08:52:03 PM
On Taylor's play, the defender came off his man and was under the basket.  That is the rule change they made last year.  I don't like it, because each official interprets it differently.  I wish they would have the dotted line that the NBA uses.  That would make it more consistent and also take some of the confussion away from the fans on those calls.

I was stunned they didn't have the charge circle, and I said it at the beginning of the year.  That rule change that you refer to I don't think is really a rule change, it just gives the ref another excuse to make whatever call he wants to make. I didn't think the guy was close to under the basket. 

It looks like Taylor is relying on the chicken wing and shoulder dip a lot more now.  After watching this year, I have no idea what contact a dribbler is allowed to make with his off arm.

I hope Pullen crushes him.

Spaniel with a Short Tail

Cincinnati looking good. I thought they were pretenders all year.  Looks like I was wrong.  Had Mizzou winning in my bracket.

On another note, I hurt a little every time Kim English is mentioned.

JamilJaeJamailJrJuan

Real bummer with St. John's here. They're a really, really good team with DJ Kennedy. They're just a good team without him. Zags are currently handing it to the Johnnies. Too bad.
Quote from: Goose on February 09, 2017, 11:06:04 AM
I would take the Rick SLU program right now.

Spaniel with a Short Tail

UCLA may blow a 23 point lead with 6 minntes left (approximations).

JamilJaeJamailJrJuan

Quote from: KC2016 on March 17, 2011, 10:45:49 PM
UCLA may blow a 23 point lead with 6 minntes left (approximations).

Almost did. Man, what a rough day on the bracket.
Quote from: Goose on February 09, 2017, 11:06:04 AM
I would take the Rick SLU program right now.

karavotsos

Cincy v. UConn is the travesty of round 2.  If you're going to do that put a potential Wisconsin v. Purdue in Round 3, at least.  No one wants to watch more of that Big 10 nonsense than necessary.

Cronin moved up a notch in my book this year.  That puts him at notch one.

Previous topic - Next topic