collapse

Resources

Hangin' at the Al Superbar Trading Post Scholarship table MUScoop Wiki

Stud of Creighton Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1
'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

What would make you show Shaka the door in March? by mileskishnish72
[Today at 08:27:56 AM]
Zaide Didn’t Travel With Team by Viper
[Today at 08:02:13 AM]
2025-26 Big East Conference TV Schedule by Mr. Nielsen
[Today at 07:09:25 AM]
2025-26 Big East Thread by MU82
[Today at 01:19:33 AM]
Marquette NBA Thread by K1 Lover
[Today at 12:12:45 AM]
A question for the Scoop elders by MuggsyB
[December 22, 2025, 11:48:41 PM]
How many guys stay? by Newsdreams
[December 22, 2025, 09:27:35 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Seton Hall

Marquette
63
Marquette vs
 Seton Hall
Date/Time: Dec 30, 2025, 6:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Creighton
84

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

WashDCWarrior

March 12, 2007, 03:04:20 PM
You've gotta feel for the teams that win their conference tournaments and qualify for the NCAA tournament. (sort of)  They play on Tuesday.  Nobody running a pool requires that you have your bracket in prior to this game.  It's a freebie.  Why?  Because they're just going to lose to the #1 seed, so who (outside of fans of the two unfortunate teams) cares.

Here's how to make the play-in exciting.  (Since I guess we can't just have a 64-team field.)  Make it between the last two at large bids.  This year that would include two of the following: Old Dominion, Illinois, and Arkansas.  That way, teams who earned their way in by winning their tournaments are actually in.  Plus the play-in matters for your brackets and would be exciting to watch.

marquetteff03

#1
March 12, 2007, 04:10:07 PM
Thats a flippin awesome idea, start a petition.

Makes less preassure for the committee too because the "last two in" have to duke it out,or in for that matter

AlumKCof93

#2
March 12, 2007, 04:11:09 PM
The problem with that idea is that the play-in game by the two 12 seeds will have to play on a Tuesday and then turn around and play Friday and Sunday.  It would be an unfair advantage to the opponents of the play-in opponent as the opponent would be running on fumes by the time Sunday rolled around.
"Yes, Dinnertime!  The perfect break between work and drunk" - Homer J. Simpson

Buzz Williams' Spillproof Chiclets Cup

#3
March 12, 2007, 04:15:04 PM
Why not just have a 64 team bracket? It was good enough for the women... ::)
“These guys in this locker room are all warriors -- every one of them. We ought to change our name back from the Golden Eagles because Warriors are what we really are." ~Wesley Matthews

WashDCWarrior

#4
March 12, 2007, 04:16:08 PM
Quote from: AlumKCof93 on March 12, 2007, 04:11:09 PM
The problem with that idea is that the play-in game by the two 12 seeds will have to play on a Tuesday and then turn around and play Friday and Sunday.  It would be an unfair advantage to the opponents of the play-in opponent as the opponent would be running on fumes by the time Sunday rolled around.

That's a trade-off I'd be willing to make.  You can argue that they should have played better during the season.  I just think if a team automatically qualifies, let them be in the actual tournament.

WashDCWarrior

#5
March 12, 2007, 04:17:15 PM
Quote from: notkirkcameron on March 12, 2007, 04:15:04 PM
Why not just have a 64 team bracket? It was good enough for the women... ::)

I'd be happy with that, but it seems we're stuck with 65.

That is of course until the brain trust expands it to 128.  ::)
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions
Previous topic - Next topic