collapse

Resources

Stud of Albany Game

Chase Ross

15 points, 4 rebounds,
5 assists, 5 steals,
26 minutes

2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 9/15/25 by MU82
[Today at 10:19:46 PM]


2025-26 College Hoops Thread by pbiflyer
[Today at 08:45:14 PM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by Mr. Nielsen
[Today at 08:43:59 PM]


2025-26 Big East Conference TV Schedule by Mr. Nielsen
[Today at 06:37:46 PM]


NM by Jay Bee
[Today at 06:27:01 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by Jay Bee
[Today at 05:50:16 PM]


5th Year, so judge by Vander Blue Man Group
[Today at 05:38:03 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Indiana

Marquette
100
Marquette vs.
Indiana
Date/Time: Nov 9, 2025, 12:00pm
TV: ESPN
Schedule for 2025-26
Southern
82

WashDCWarrior

You've gotta feel for the teams that win their conference tournaments and qualify for the NCAA tournament. (sort of)  They play on Tuesday.  Nobody running a pool requires that you have your bracket in prior to this game.  It's a freebie.  Why?  Because they're just going to lose to the #1 seed, so who (outside of fans of the two unfortunate teams) cares.

Here's how to make the play-in exciting.  (Since I guess we can't just have a 64-team field.)  Make it between the last two at large bids.  This year that would include two of the following: Old Dominion, Illinois, and Arkansas.  That way, teams who earned their way in by winning their tournaments are actually in.  Plus the play-in matters for your brackets and would be exciting to watch.

marquetteff03

Thats a flippin awesome idea, start a petition.

Makes less preassure for the committee too because the "last two in" have to duke it out,or in for that matter

AlumKCof93

The problem with that idea is that the play-in game by the two 12 seeds will have to play on a Tuesday and then turn around and play Friday and Sunday.  It would be an unfair advantage to the opponents of the play-in opponent as the opponent would be running on fumes by the time Sunday rolled around.
"Yes, Dinnertime!  The perfect break between work and drunk" - Homer J. Simpson

Buzz Williams' Spillproof Chiclets Cup

Why not just have a 64 team bracket? It was good enough for the women... ::)
“These guys in this locker room are all warriors -- every one of them. We ought to change our name back from the Golden Eagles because Warriors are what we really are." ~Wesley Matthews

WashDCWarrior

Quote from: AlumKCof93 on March 12, 2007, 04:11:09 PM
The problem with that idea is that the play-in game by the two 12 seeds will have to play on a Tuesday and then turn around and play Friday and Sunday.  It would be an unfair advantage to the opponents of the play-in opponent as the opponent would be running on fumes by the time Sunday rolled around.

That's a trade-off I'd be willing to make.  You can argue that they should have played better during the season.  I just think if a team automatically qualifies, let them be in the actual tournament.

WashDCWarrior

Quote from: notkirkcameron on March 12, 2007, 04:15:04 PM
Why not just have a 64 team bracket? It was good enough for the women... ::)

I'd be happy with that, but it seems we're stuck with 65.

That is of course until the brain trust expands it to 128.  ::)

Previous topic - Next topic