collapse

Resources

Stud of Providence Game

Adrien Stevens

21 points, 4 rebounds,
1 assist, 4 steals,
32 minutes

2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross5
James Jr4
Parham1
Stevens1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

2025-26 College Hoops Thread by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[Today at 06:53:37 AM]


Difficult, Not Impossible. by DoctorV
[Today at 06:52:41 AM]


The Shaka Era is happening! by The Sultan
[Today at 05:48:16 AM]


2026 Coaching Carousel by The Sultan
[Today at 05:46:17 AM]


You Know Your Teams Young When....... by Vander Blue Man Group
[March 06, 2026, 11:02:35 PM]


2021 Transfer Portal by Vander Blue Man Group
[March 06, 2026, 11:01:54 PM]


Big East in 5 Years by Mu8891
[March 06, 2026, 08:03:24 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up:  UConn

Marquette
78
Marquette vs
UConn
Date/Time: Mar 7, 2026, 11:30am
TV: Fox
Schedule for 2025-26
Providence
56

ChicosBailBonds

I said they were horrible two weeks ago, I'm sticking to it.  UW-m is terrible.

NersEllenson

Uh oh..this must mean DePaul will beat us by 11 points..since we only beat UWM by 3 points.  We are screwed.
"I'm not sure Cadougan would fix the problems on this team. I'm not even convinced he would be better for this team than DeWil is."

BrewCity77, December 8, 2013

warthog-driver

Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on December 14, 2010, 10:57:03 PM
I said they were horrible two weeks ago, I'm sticking to it.  UW-m is terrible.

Perhaps we should have defeated UWM by a greater margin? Certainly not the shameful performance of that night. Prithy, The Bronzed Beast of Bloomington would not have had such a miserable excuse of a win!

ChicosBailBonds

Nope, but I think we can stop the ridiculous claims of how good UW-m was to try and cover for our performance.  They are dreadful...as was much of our performance that night.

I really wonder if Jeter will survive this year.

warthog-driver

The Jete is a good man. I hope he dodges the SAM but I fear he will crash and burn.

MUfan12

Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on December 14, 2010, 11:01:52 PM
I really wonder if Jeter will survive this year.

Especially with a new AD likely on board. He's been nothing but mediocre after his first year.

JMcSteal


DavantesInferno

Quote from: JMcSteal on December 15, 2010, 01:38:15 AM
Who is the new AD?

UWM hasn't announced one yet. However, they announced three finalists in the job search on Monday. The top three are Paul Plinske, the UW-Whitewater AD, Rick Costello, deputy AD for Rutgers and Grace Calhoun the associate AD from Indiana. Whoever they pick looks to have a pretty tough job with all of the budget cuts that are expected to be made inside the athletic department.

downtown85

and Drexel beat Looeyville and Oakland beat Tenn.  Gotta love college hoops.

Rollout-the-Barrel

I'm glad depaul is less terrible than uwm in rosemont. Big east doesn't need any crappy losses.
"We have the blues on the run!"

4everwarriors

Our game vs. DePaul should be a dogfight.
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

madtownwarrior

Glad we have Chicos to immediate to point out when MU is crappy at the first possible moment every chance he gets...

MU was up 18 at UW-M and then played crappy, UW-M also was playing at home in their marquee game they have been waiting for for years (I tried hard not to say Superbowl). 

At the same time, it is early in the season with a young team with a third year head coach. 

Christ, the tan one nearly pissed away a game to a cupcake or average at best team AT HOME on an annual basis and sometimes did (Canisuis 68 - 65 in 2004, Delaware St 66 - 60 in 2005,Winthrop Loss in 2006, N Dakota St loss in 2007)

I assume you were here calling out how bad the tanned ones teams were then when they played bad ealry in the season....

Glad we have you MU Superfan (that should be in teal)

chren21

Quote from: madtownwarrior on December 15, 2010, 07:21:36 AM
Glad we have Chicos to immediate to point out when MU is crappy at the first possible moment every chance he gets...

MU was up 18 at UW-M and then played crappy, UW-M also was playing at home in their marquee game they have been waiting for for years (I tried hard not to say Superbowl). 

At the same time, it is early in the season with a young team with a third year head coach. 

Christ, the tan one nearly pissed away a game to a cupcake or average at best team AT HOME on an annual basis and sometimes did (Canisuis 68 - 65 in 2004, Delaware St 66 - 60 in 2005,Winthrop Loss in 2006, N Dakota St loss in 2007)

I assume you were here calling out how bad the tanned ones teams were then when they played bad ealry in the season....

Glad we have you MU Superfan (that should be in teal)


UWM is terrible.  What is your summary of their team?  I think we should have beaten them by 20.  To call that a UWM home game is a joke.

GGGG

Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on December 14, 2010, 11:01:52 PM
Nope, but I think we can stop the ridiculous claims of how good UW-m was to try and cover for our performance.  They are dreadful...as was much of our performance that night.

I really wonder if Jeter will survive this year.


If they have financial issues, I think it will be very difficult for the new AD to come in an eat Jeter's contract in year one.

MerrittsMustache

Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on December 14, 2010, 10:57:03 PM
I said they were horrible two weeks ago, I'm sticking to it.  UW-m is terrible.

I correctly predicted that MU would have 10 TOs against Wisconsin. Everyone shower me with praise!

Wait, should I have started a new thread for this post? I'd hate to steal Chicos' thunder of making a thread all about himself.

g0lden3agle

Quote from: MerrittsMustache on December 15, 2010, 08:34:33 AM
I correctly predicted that MU would have 10 TOs against Wisconsin. Everyone shower me with praise!

Wait, should I have started a new thread for this post? I'd hate to steal Chicos' thunder of making a thread all about himself.

So there shouldn't be threads started up about news throughout the Big East? 

Lennys Tap

Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on December 14, 2010, 11:01:52 PM
Nope, but I think we can stop the ridiculous claims of how good UW-m was to try and cover for our performance.  They are dreadful...as was much of our performance that night.

I really wonder if Jeter will survive this year.

My sources inside the program tell me that as long as Jeter continues to do it the right way and cleans up the stench left by Pearl he's safe. No, wait, it's Indiana that doesn't care about winning, not UWM. You're right. A proud, tradition rich program like the UWM Panthers would never tolerate this kind of failure. Never mind.

ChicosBailBonds

#17
Our RPI dropped 49 spots the last 2 days, this UWM result was not a help

dsfire

#18
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on December 15, 2010, 09:41:21 AM
Our RPI dropped 49 spots the last 2 days, this UWM result was not a help
Not sure where you're looking, but statsheet shows us going from 133 on Sunday/Monday to 129 today.  Even at this ridiculously early point in the season to care about RPI, moving 49 spots without playing a game would be rather shocking.

edit: I do see us down in the 170-180 range on other sites.  Not sure what's causing that difference since statsheet should be up-to-date as of last night's games.  Still, that large of a drop should not be caused by a single opponent's game.

StillAWarrior

Quote from: MerrittsMustache on December 15, 2010, 08:34:33 AM
I correctly predicted that MU would have 10 TOs against Wisconsin. Everyone shower me with praise!

Wait, should I have started a new thread for this post? I'd hate to steal Chicos' thunder of making a thread all about himself.

Assuming for the sake of argument that Chicos is the attention whore that you seem to think he is, what is accomplished by calling him out so frequently.  If this thread wasn't "all about" Chicos before your post, you certainly helped move it in that direction.
Never wrestle with a pig.  You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.

lab_warrior


lab_warrior

Quote from: downtown85 on December 15, 2010, 03:50:32 AM
and Drexel beat Looeyville and Oakland beat Tenn.  Gotta love college hoops.

It's almost as if on a game-by-game basis, if you don't play well, you could be beaten! 

I'm not disagreeing w/Chicos that UWM is not a good basketball team, but we were up on them by 20+ and ~18, and 15 at a few points, we didn't play well for most of the second half--it's not a good win, but it's a win.  However, there is no way you can convince me that UWM wasn't way more motivated to beat us on their court versus at Rosemont against DePaul.

MU B2002

Quote from: 4everwarriors on December 15, 2010, 06:37:44 AM
Our game vs. DePaul should be a dogfight.

I hope not.  Dog fighting is illegal.  Have we learned nothing from Ron Mexico sorry, Michael Vick.
"VPI"
- Mike Hunt

mu_hilltopper

Love the rpiforecast.com website.

Our Current RPI has steadily dropped since December started .. from the 100s to 170s.

Our expected RPI is semi-steady in the high 60s.  Which is about right, and a very big challenge to make the NCAAs if that expected RPI is right.


Lennys Tap

Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on December 15, 2010, 09:41:21 AM
Our RPI dropped 49 spots the last 2 days, this UWM result was not a help

1. If our RPI really dropped 49 spots because DePaul beat UWM it only shows that RPI rankings at this point in the year are TOTALLY MEANINGLESS, in which case why bother.
2. 180 translates into 3 or 4 wins in conference (max). If we're that bad, it's officially "wait until next year" time.

Previous topic - Next topic