#52

[ChicosBailBonds]

http://collegehoopsnet.com/52-marquette-2010-11-basketball-preview-168783


52nd and a NCAA bid is the prediction

[Lennys Tap]

Interesting that they have Vander as our starting point guard. In the scrimmages I've seen he's been playing off the ball.

[Henry Sugar]

"Replacing Maurice Acker and David Cubillan will not be easy."

That's my favorite part of the article, for many reasons.

[Ari Gold]

I don't think there is a whole lot right with this article

[ChicosBailBonds]

I'm betting they meant replacing their experience and decisionmaking.  Solid with the ball and not easily rattled.

[SalsaMan]

Perhaps this bio sketch of the author explains the quality of the article:

Growing up in Michigan, Joel Welser inherited a love for Big Ten sports. After defying all family traditions and not going to Michigan State, Joel headed out west to earn his bachelor degree from California State University, Northridge in Cinema Television Arts, specializing in screenwriting. For reasons still unknown, after his stint in Hollywood, Joel headed back to Michigan where he remains to this day complaining about the cold.

I think Mr Welser should have stayed in Hollywood writing fiction. Though now baack in Michigan he continues to play fast and loose with the facts. Or, is it simply that he is a Big Ten person?

[MUfan12]

I'm betting they meant replacing their experience and decisionmaking.  Solid with the ball and not easily rattled.

And both shot the ball very well. I really think people are underestimating how good those two were last year, despite their limitations.

[Markusquette]

And both shot the ball very well. I really think people are underestimating how good those two were last year, despite their limitations.

Agreed.

[wojosdojo]

does anyone know why buzz's record is 47-21 on this website (and crackedsidewalks)? did i miss something, i could have sworn, or i know hes 47-22? anyone?

[ChicosBailBonds]

does anyone know why buzz's record is 47-21 on this website (and crackedsidewalks)? did i miss something, i could have sworn, or i know hes 47-22? anyone?

No one is recognizing the loss to DePaul...everyone figures it didn't really happen


Updated in teal so Salsaman (love his latest name and incarnation) can follow along.

[SalsaMan]

No one is recognizing the loss to DePaul...every figures it didn't really happen

A more horrific loss was the bitch slapping given to Marquette by Western Michigan in the first round of the NIT at The Bradley Center. Or was it the 33 point loss to Kansas on the biggest stage of all?

[ChicosBailBonds]

A more horrific loss was the bitch slapping given to Marquette by Western Michigan in the first round of the NIT at The Bradley Center. Or was it the 33 point loss to Kansas on the biggest stage of all?

I'll put it in teal for you next time.

But yes, losing to the national runner-up and #2 team in the nation is more horrific then losing to a team that has won one game in 2 years in the league.  I can definitely see where you are coming from.

And Western Michigan made the NIT...a post season team.....again, I can definitely see where you are coming from.

You've nailed it.

[SalsaMan]

It is all about context.

The loss to KU was before the entire nation. Our talent was there; the game plan was atrocious. That night told the nation we didn't belong.

Western Michigan? At home? It was jarring testimony just how far we had fallen once Wade left campus. I know others around the nation asked if the Final Four was a fluke.

[ChicosBailBonds]

A few days earlier when we spanked #1 Kentucky showed we belonged.  Two days before that when we beat #4 Pittsburgh, showed we belonged.  A week earlier when we beat #25 Missouri and Holy Cross, showed we belonged.  Having a record of 27-4 going into that KU game, showed we belonged.  Beating the ACC, Big East, Big Ten, SEC champs that year, showed we belonged.  Capturing the CUSA title, showed we belonged.

I could go on, but clearly you seem to think one game defined an entire season....I'm guessing there's only one reason why you think that and it's fairly easy to identify in your posts.

I've updated the earlier post to put it in teal so we're all on the same page now as well.

Have a great day.

[hairy worthen]

A few days earlier when we spanked #1 Kentucky showed we belonged.  Two days before that when we beat #4 Pittsburgh, showed we belonged.  A week earlier when we beat #25 Missouri and Holy Cross, showed we belonged.  Having a record of 27-4 going into that KU game, showed we belonged.  Beating the ACC, Big East, Big Ten, SEC champs that year, showed we belonged.  Capturing the CUSA title, showed we belonged.

I could go on, but clearly you seem to think one game defined an entire season....I'm guessing there's only one reason why you think that and it's fairly easy to identify in your posts.

I've updated the earlier post to put it in teal so we're all on the same page now as well.

Have a great day.

You are correct the season showed we belonged, but unfortunately many if not most people who watch the final four are casual fans who were judging MU based on that one game, and in their eyes we did not belong.

[Marquette84]

You are correct the season showed we belonged, but unfortunately many if not most people who watch the final four are casual fans who were judging MU based on that one game, and in their eyes we did not belong.

The casual fans don't even remember who was IN the game 10 minutes after it ended.  And even then they couldn't tell you the names of the teams--only their uniform colors. 

Meanwhile, any fan with more than two functioning brain cells knows you can't get to the final four on a fluke.

[T-Bone]

It is all about context.

I thought the context was Buzz's record?

does anyone know why buzz's record is 47-21 on this website (and crackedsidewalks)? did i miss something, i could have sworn, or i know hes 47-22? anyone?

[4everwarriors]

Clearly it was not only the loss to KU, but the ill-prepared manner in which they did so. With a week to get ready, Crean dropped a turd on college basketball's biggest stage and exposed him for the fraud and phony we all now realize he is.

[Benny B]

The casual fans don't even remember who was IN the game 10 minutes after it ended.  And even then they couldn't tell you the names of the teams--only their uniform colors. 

Meanwhile, any fan with more than two functioning brain cells knows you can't get to the final four on a fluke.

What would you call George Mason then?

I see your point, but I'd rephrase to say "a #3 seed making it to the Final Four could not be considered a fluke."

[MerrittsMustache]

A few days earlier when we spanked #1 Kentucky showed we belonged.  Two days before that when we beat #4 Pittsburgh, showed we belonged.  A week earlier when we beat #25 Missouri and Holy Cross, showed we belonged.  Having a record of 27-4 going into that KU game, showed we belonged.  Beating the ACC, Big East, Big Ten, SEC champs that year, showed we belonged.  Capturing the CUSA title, showed we belonged.

Beating a 14-seed by 2 points showed MU belonged?

(That was a good post, Chicos. I just couldn't resist )

Many MU fans forget (or refuse to acknowledge) that Crean did some great things for MU basketball. Say what you want about TC as a person, but you can't deny that he put MU back on the basketball map.

That being said, he completely botched the Kansas game. He overestimated his own team and underestimated his opponent. He thought MU could run with Kansas and they got their doors blown off. However, does anyone not associated with MU or Kansas even remember that game? I doubt it. In the grand scheme of things, that one game really did nothing to hurt MU in any way shape or form.

[hairy worthen]

The casual fans don't even remember who was IN the game 10 minutes after it ended.  And even then they couldn't tell you the names of the teams--only their uniform colors. 

Meanwhile, any fan with more than two functioning brain cells knows you can't get to the final four on a fluke.

I am not arguing that the final four run was a fluke. Obviously it was not. I disagree with you on how you characterize the "casual fan". What you are saying is on the extreme end. The median audience, probably came away with the opinion that MU didn't belong. Hell some announcers and analysts were saying it and I remember some calling MU a mid major.

Did it matter in the long run? No But it would have been a lot better to have at least a respectable showing.

[79Warrior]

A more horrific loss was the bitch slapping given to Marquette by Western Michigan in the first round of the NIT at The Bradley Center. Or was it the 33 point loss to Kansas on the biggest stage of all?

Really? You give a sh## about an NIT loss???? Uou have the bar set pretty low. I will take any type loss in the NCAA Finals against a frigging NIT loss every year..

[Marquette84]

I am not arguing that the final four run was a fluke. Obviously it was not. I disagree with you on how you characterize the "casual fan". What you are saying is on the extreme end. The median audience, probably came away with the opinion that MU didn't belong. Hell some announcers and analysts were saying it and I remember some calling MU a mid major.

Did it matter in the long run? No But it would have been a lot better to have at least a respectable showing.

I think your comment about being called a mid-major is out of context. The comment was made by Billy Packer in the selection show--mainly because we were a small Catholic school in CUSA--not an ACC power.

Second, I think our memories differ on what the way the announcers were discussing the game.  As I recall, they said something along the lines of "this is not the same Marquette team that beat #4 Pitt and #1 Kentucky to get here" and "Marquette just ran into the Kansas buzzsaw."   

I simply don't recall anyone anyone saying "Boy, we never thought MU belonged at this level, and this game proves it." 

[muchalktalk]

Some of you are hilarious.  Diener (who was fighting shin-splints) and Novak, who had been shooting really well before that game, were a combined 2-18.  We shot 19% from the three point line.  I'm not sure how that translates into Crean laying an egg. 

Unfortunately, some here will do whatever they can to tear-down Crean, even if it means tearing-down a team that did wonders for MU.
 

[Nukem2]

Some of you are hilarious.  Diener (who was fighting shin-splints) and Novak, who had been shooting really well before that game, were a combined 2-18.  We shot 19% from the three point line.  I'm not sure how that translates into Crean laying an egg. 

Unfortunately, some here will do whatever they can to tear-down Crean, even if it means tearing-down a team that did wonders for MU.
 

The shooting was obviously an issue.  But, the real problem was the game plan under which MU tried to run with Kansas.  Big mistake by TC.  But I would not call it laying an egg...