collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Pearson to MU by tower912
[Today at 05:47:57 AM]


Marquette freshmen at Goolsby's 7/12 by MuMark
[July 12, 2025, 09:44:22 PM]


Recruiting as of 7/15/25 by MuMark
[July 12, 2025, 07:09:07 PM]


Marquette NBA Thread by MuggsyB
[July 12, 2025, 08:06:27 AM]


Nash Walker commits to MU by Captain Quette
[July 11, 2025, 02:40:11 PM]


Congrats to Royce by tower912
[July 10, 2025, 09:00:17 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

HoopsMalone

I think you should defend your point or give a good reason against some else's point.  Having a like or dislike button is an easy way out.  

The more reasoning/information the better.  I don't know if we want to promote arbitrary judging.  

We don't want popularity contests.  If there was a like or dislike button, I would also suggest the option to ignore it.  I would ignore the like/dislike feature for sure.

🏀

I would like to state that I was not being sarcastic at all.

My recruiting information starts and ends with BMA, since I gave up my subscription to the Premium Board after I was banned from posting.

I was merely asking if BMA could take the 5 kids we were heavily involved in and say "He's the best, he's the worst, in my opinion."

MU_Iceman

Quote from: MarkCharles on October 27, 2010, 03:46:56 PM
And its not usually people soliciting his knowledge as some are saying. Judging by the reaction to my comment, not many people share my view and I very well could be completely off base. If so, my bad.

On multiple occassions in the past, when a thread has been about recruits, I have directly solicited BMA's opinion...

mu-rara

I live for posts from BMA, Mark Miller, and Ganzer.  Otherwise, (including my posts) its all pretty "blah, blah, blah".  

Sometimes the blah, blah can be pretty funny, so its worth reading, but I hang my hat on the stuff from the 3 I mentioned.

WellsstreetWanderer


rocky_warrior

Quote from: marqptm on October 28, 2010, 09:47:58 AM
since I gave up my subscription to the Premium Board after I was banned from posting.

No that's funny.  We'll still let you pay and read, but you're not allowed to post anymore.

4everwarriors

Who on here isn't banned from posting on the other board?
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

NersEllenson

Quote from: marqptm on October 28, 2010, 09:47:58 AM
I would like to state that I was not being sarcastic at all.

My recruiting information starts and ends with BMA, since I gave up my subscription to the Premium Board after I was banned from posting.

I was merely asking if BMA could take the 5 kids we were heavily involved in and say "He's the best, he's the worst, in my opinion."

Many within the program truly believe that Juan Anderson was the best out of Faust and Harrison.  Hood shoots it better than Anderson, but Anderson has Hood on many of the intangibles/fundamental aspects of the game.  You could perhaps rank the guys as far as staff preference:  Hood and Anderson, 1 and 1a.  Faust and Harrison 2 and 2a.  Shaw is in his own category.
"I'm not sure Cadougan would fix the problems on this team. I'm not even convinced he would be better for this team than DeWil is."

BrewCity77, December 8, 2013

Golden Avalanche

Quote from: Ners on October 28, 2010, 12:19:30 PM
Many within the program truly believe that Juan Anderson was the best out of Faust and Harrison.  Hood shoots it better than Anderson, but Anderson has Hood on many of the intangibles/fundamental aspects of the game.  You could perhaps rank the guys as far as staff preference:  Hood and Anderson, 1 and 1a.  Faust and Harrison 2 and 2a.  Shaw is in his own category.

I have to ask: what is the source of this comment? My guess is simply because Anderson is the one who chose MU (whereas the others didn't), that's why he'd be placed higher.

If we're ranking, MU's top five targets this season were Dawson, Shaw, Faust, Hood, and Harrison.

Boone

That's the first I've heard of that, as well. Sounds like a rationalization.

🏀

Quote from: rocky_warrior on October 28, 2010, 11:47:33 AM
No that's funny.  We'll still let you pay and read, but you're not allowed to post anymore.

Exactly. Why was I banned? For starting a NASCAR thread.

NersEllenson

Quote from: The Golden Avalanche on October 28, 2010, 12:26:48 PM
I have to ask: what is the source of this comment? My guess is simply because Anderson is the one who chose MU (whereas the others didn't), that's why he'd be placed higher.

If we're ranking, MU's top five targets this season were Dawson, Shaw, Faust, Hood, and Harrison.

A very credible source.  The reality is that Anderson performed extremely well against current MU players on his visit and it gave pause to the notion than Faust or Harrison were better players.  The staff wanted Hood, and that's why I called him 1a..out of the Faust, Harrison and Anderson.  Dawson and Shaw could be viewed as "similar" players, though Jamil Wilson is pretty much a Dawson type of player, with possibly more upside/athleticism.  I'm not saying the staff wouldn't have welcomed commits from Faust, Harrison, or Dawson...but Anderson was a revelation once he got on campus and competed with the guys on the current team.
"I'm not sure Cadougan would fix the problems on this team. I'm not even convinced he would be better for this team than DeWil is."

BrewCity77, December 8, 2013

GOMU1104

Ners gets all of his info from the Premium Board. 

Golden Avalanche

Quote from: Ners on October 28, 2010, 01:01:27 PM
A very credible source.  The reality is that Anderson performed extremely well against current MU players on his visit and it gave pause to the notion than Faust or Harrison were better players.  The staff wanted Hood, and that's why I called him 1a..out of the Faust, Harrison and Anderson.  Dawson and Shaw could be viewed as "similar" players, though Jamil Wilson is pretty much a Dawson type of player, with possibly more upside/athleticism.  I'm not saying the staff wouldn't have welcomed commits from Faust, Harrison, or Dawson...but Anderson was a revelation once he got on campus and competed with the guys on the current team.

Sounds a lot like the guy who wanted us is better then the guys who didn't want us.

No denying Anderson played well on his visit. Lots of recruits do that. But it means squat when comparing the players. Faust and Harrison are elite national prospects. They were wanted badly.

I don't see Dawson and Shaw as similar players. One is a 6'5'' rebounding banger who's game stops at the mid-range. The other one is a 6'8'' athlete who will drift outside and likely play the 3. Also, I don't think Wilson is pretty much a Dawson type player as that's not his game at all. He's more similar to Shaw but not the same.

brewcity77

Quote from: The Golden Avalanche on October 28, 2010, 03:40:08 PM
No denying Anderson played well on his visit. Lots of recruits do that. But it means squat when comparing the players. Faust and Harrison are elite national prospects. They were wanted badly.

One possible reassurance is bearing in mind that Buzz has done a good job of casting a wide net. Georgia, Florida, Wisconsin, California, North Carolina, Texas, high school, junior college, high-major D1 transfer, he is scouring everywhere to find players. However, many of the recruiting services do not cast as wide a net when they rate players. Faust is an East Coast player, and Texas is very well-scouted when it comes to high school athletes. It's entirely possible that had Anderson played on the East Coast or in another higher-profile location that he would be seen universally as a four-star, possibly regarded as a top-30 or top-40 player instead of a top-80 or so where he seems to be slotted. He might be just as badly wanted if that were the case.

And of course, our two best players are DJO and Butler, neither of whom were rated that highly coming out of high school but would likely walk in and be able to earn a starting spot on most any team in the country.

GGGG

Quote from: marqptm on October 28, 2010, 12:42:47 PM
Exactly. Why was I banned? For starting a NASCAR thread.


Hell, not only would I have banned you for that, I would have found you and beat you with a stick.

🏀

Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on October 28, 2010, 04:44:00 PM

Hell, not only would I have banned you for that, I would have found you and beat you with a stick.

I was proving a point!

reinko

Quote from: marqptm on October 28, 2010, 06:09:43 PM
I was proving a point!

What the crap was your point?  Turning left for 3 hours is a sport??

🏀

Quote from: reinko on October 28, 2010, 07:19:59 PM
What the crap was your point?  Turning left for 3 hours is a sport??

John Dodds is a nazi.

TallTitan34

PTM made a post that was off-topic but labeled OT.  I forgot what it was, but it wasn't anything that further off topic than other OT threads on the board.  

Dodds deleted the thread so PTM went as far off-topic as he could: NASCAR.

Jacks DC

I heard from a very good source that BMA was more respected within the program than Anderson, Hood, Shaw or Faust.

ATWizJr

Not sure who bma is but he has high credibility and seems to know the inner workings at MU BB.  Who is that masked man?

Previous topic - Next topic