collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 7/15/25 by MuMark
[Today at 11:43:10 AM]


Marquette freshmen at Goolsby's 7/12 by muwarrior69
[Today at 10:54:44 AM]


Pearson to MU by Juan Anderson's Mixtape
[Today at 09:51:20 AM]


Marquette NBA Thread by MuggsyB
[July 12, 2025, 08:06:27 AM]


Nash Walker commits to MU by Captain Quette
[July 11, 2025, 02:40:11 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

copious1218

Just found this on ESPN:

@ReggieRankin Just spoke with Nike Team Florida PF Chris Bryant who is recovering well from surgery on his left eye

@ReggieRankin Bryant is looking forward to setting up visits soon and Likes

@ReggieRankin Alabama,TCU,UNC-Wilmington,Marquette and Florida State. Chris has great length and upside.

ChicosBailBonds

I thought we didn't recruit 3 star players anymore?  Or so Canadian Dimes stated.

bilsu

A three star could be a borderline 4 star or a borderline 2 star and there probably is a hugh difference.

GOO

Since it seems like we are going to strike out on the three remaining high profile recruits, my guess is that we will start to hear about a few other guys that Buzz is in on. 

Some of these 3 stars guys, could be as good as 4 star guys, or may require a year or two to develop.  The only difference between some 3 star and 4 star type of guys, in some cases, is a little more development.  There is more risk, but I don't mind taking a big that projects to be a solid player in a couple of years.  I also wouldn't mind one glue type of guy at the 2 or 3, especially if he can shoot it.  Sprinkle in a glue guy and a developmental player once in a while, if by design or by default.  This would be a good year to take a deveopmental player, by default, and then keep one open for the spring.

And, I am not really big on the number of stars, since the recruiting services are not exactly spot on.  I'd trust Buzz's evaluations and knowing what he wants in a player more than the number of stars.

Ya, I'd rather have Hood commit.  But if that isn't going to happen, we have a solid base and can afford a glue guy or a development type of player this year with one of the scholarships.  If a guy has the size, hands, and is athletic enough... and if he has the desire, even if he is a 3 star, he may project as a solid  player after a couple of years. 

MarkCharles

Quote from: GOO on October 26, 2010, 10:39:20 AM


Some of these 3 stars guys, could be as good as 4 star guys, or may require a year or two to develop.  The only difference between some 3 star and 4 star type of guys, in some cases, is a little more development. 

Exactly. It is so hard to ever crack the top100 rankings unless you are a really top level player as a freshman or sophomore at the latest. Some kids develop, grow, hit puberty at later stages and are forever behind the 8ball in recruiting services' eyes.

I just heard of this kid for the first time, but I like the looks of him. Seems like a good fit, and seems to be pretty solidly rated by all the services.

HoopsMalone

I don't mind three star players.  Lets fill needs rather than the best best available player.  An interior banger or a shooter would fill roles nicely on the next two teams.  JUCO or 3-star, it does not matter.  Just find some role players and move on to the 2012 class.

Canadian Dimes

well said ...we have rebuilt from the debacle Buzz inherited and a Freshman is now not forced into action.  If the kid is a three star but the coaches like his upside there is time for development. 

Sounds like he was out with an eye injury too.  God only knows how that may have hurt his ranking.. being looked at by some decent schools. 


MuMark

Jimmy Butler and DJO were both 2 star players coming out of high school.

Recruiting rankings are fun to talk about but they get it wrong on lots of kids every year.

GGGG

That article is almost a year old.  It would be nice to see how his junior year and summer AAU circuit went.

thanooj

In buzz I trust etc. etc.

A shooter would be a really good get.  Some low who can stroke it.  With a team of athletes who can get to the hole a dead eye could thrive knocking down open threes a la left and bj for Jordan's bulls.
Original member of the "Dean's List"

TedBaxter

If You Aren't All In For Marquette Basketball, Move On

ChicosBailBonds

Quote from: bilsu on October 26, 2010, 10:25:12 AM
A three star could be a borderline 4 star or a borderline 2 star and there probably is a hugh difference.

I don't disagree with you at all.  It was more of a bigger point to counter what Dimes and others stated that we wouldn't be going after 3 star kids anymore, which of course was a ridiculous comment to make in the first place.

Some people are so damn fixated on the number of stars next to their name....give me basketball players with high basketball IQ's that know how to play the game and are winners.  If they are 5 hearts, great.  If they are 3 hearts but have attributes that a 4 heart doesn't, then take the lowly 3 heart kid.  I trust the coaches will select who they think has a ceiling to improve.  Some of them they will strikeout on, that's the way it goes.

MarkCharles

Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on October 26, 2010, 01:11:59 PM
I don't disagree with you at all.  It was more of a bigger point to counter what Dimes and others stated that we wouldn't be going after 3 star kids anymore, which of course was a ridiculous comment to make in the first place.

Some people are so damn fixated on the number of stars next to their name....give me basketball players with high basketball IQ's that know how to play the game and are winners.  If they are 5 hearts, great.  If they are 3 hearts but have attributes that a 4 heart doesn't, then take the lowly 3 heart kid.  I trust the coaches will select who they think has a ceiling to improve.  Some of them they will strikeout on, that's the way it goes.


huh? hearts?

Litehouse

Quote from: TedBaxter on October 26, 2010, 12:23:45 PM
http://breakdownmagazine.com/discus/messages/11/2187.html?1285688441

I like the sound of this...
"His energy level was off the chart, sprinting the floor, grabbing rebounds, and throwing down dunks. He also displayed a decent handle in the open court during transition."

4everwarriors

In general, why don't we save our collective boners for recruits who actually commit to MU.
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

Skatastrophy

Quote from: 4everwarriors on October 26, 2010, 01:35:46 PM
In general, why don't we save our collective boners for recruits who actually commit to MU.

I think future MU players would really appreciate if we kept our boners to ourselves.

ATL MU Warrior

Quote from: 4everwarriors on October 26, 2010, 01:35:46 PM
In general, why don't we save our collective boners for recruits who actually commit to MU.
That's like waiting til you're married to have sex...no thanks.

Besides, according to some we're never going to sign anybody else in this class...that's a long time to wait.   ;D

ChicosBailBonds

Quote from: MarkCharles on October 26, 2010, 01:17:47 PM
huh? hearts?

LOL.  I meant stars.  Hearts is a scoring profile a vendor of ours uses and I must have had that on my mind.

bilsu

Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on October 26, 2010, 04:08:53 PM
LOL.  I meant stars.  Hearts is a scoring profile a vendor of ours uses and I must have had that on my mind.
Is the vendor a woman?

SalsaMan

Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on October 26, 2010, 10:01:11 AM
I thought we didn't recruit 3 star players anymore?  Or so Canadian Dimes stated.

Three Stars have an express lane to Bloomington, IN

brewcity77

I really enjoyed reading ESPN's profile on Bryant. First, having him ranked as the #26 PF in the class with a grade of 92 indicates he's probably on the high side of the 3-star prospects. Sounds like he's a high-energy guy who is good both on the offensive and defensive end, but that what's holding him back is adding strength and size to improve in the low post. I imagine a year or two in the weight room would get him sorted out. They also list him at 6'8", and while it might be splitting hairs, I really see the difference between 6'7" and 6'8" as one of the differences usually between a potentially high-level small and power forward. Maybe it's just me, but I like that extra inch for the 4 position.

ESPN Chris Bryant Recruiting Profile

If we miss out on Hood, Faust, and Shaw, I think Bryant would be a really nice consolation prize.

SalsaMan

Quote from: ATL MU Warrior on October 26, 2010, 01:45:30 PM
That's like waiting til you're married to have sex...no thanks.

And you call yourself a Catholic?

jeffreyweee

Quote from: SalsaMan on October 26, 2010, 05:11:10 PM
And you call yourself a Catholic?

No, I think he calls himself reasonable.

Pakuni

Quote from: SalsaMan on October 26, 2010, 05:11:10 PM
And you call yourself a Catholic?
Must ... resist ... priest .... remark.

Previous topic - Next topic