collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by Aircraftcarrier
[Today at 03:03:03 PM]


Scouting Report: Ian Miletic by MU82
[Today at 02:36:17 PM]


What is the actual gap between Marquette and the top of the Big East by Vander Blue Man Group
[Today at 02:32:21 PM]


2026 Bracketology by MU82
[Today at 02:32:12 PM]


Pearson to MU by MuMark
[Today at 11:11:57 AM]


Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by The Sultan
[Today at 08:41:12 AM]


NM by mu_hilltopper
[May 17, 2025, 03:51:26 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


Who is going to win the WC?

Netherlands
Spain

JWags85

Quote from: LA on June 18, 2010, 10:53:23 AM
The US got robbed! That was a goal!

Off all the infractions on that setpiece, they call the one that didn't actually occur.  Great.  Thanks Leon from Curb Your Enthusiasm, swallow your whistle next time.

StillAWarrior

Quote from: JWags85 on June 18, 2010, 10:58:46 AM
Off all the infractions on that setpiece, they call the one that didn't actually occur.  Great.  Thanks Leon from Curb Your Enthusiasm, swallow your whistle next time.

What infractions?  You mean the bear hug to Bradley?  He was just showing his affection.  What a crock.
Never wrestle with a pig.  You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.

MUFC9295

Why does the interviewer from ESPN keep asking about the officiating?  The coach and players risk punishment if they disparage the refs.  I understand it is a natural question, but think of the potential damage.  Remember Jackie Charlton in USA 94?  Banned from the sidelines.

I'm appalled at the lack of possession and poor passing by the US.  Half the team wants to run and gun, while the other half wonder what the strategy is.  Way to dig deep though.  C'mon Algeria - tie England!

Does anyone else notice the parallels to watching MU hoops while watching the US?  Same feelings! 

DiaperDandy

We just got hosed...What a terrible call.  What a great comeback thought.  Hopefully this call will give the US reason to come out firing against Algeria although being a must win game should be motivation enough.

ATWizJr

Although we didn't play well enough in the first half to warrant winning, we did get screwed onn Edu's goal and should have won.  This ref was just as bad as the Spanish card throwing ref in the Germany/Serbia game today.  I'll be curious to hear his explanation if there is one.

MU B2002

Quote from: ATWizJr on June 18, 2010, 11:29:30 AM
Although we didn't play well enough in the first half to warrant winning, we did get screwed onn Edu's goal and should have won.  This ref was just as bad as the Spanish card throwing ref in the Germany/Serbia game today.  I'll be curious to hear his explanation if there is one.


Explanation from FIFA: Foul on Edu during the free kick, not an offside call.
"VPI"
- Mike Hunt

GoldenWarrior

Quote from: MU B2002 on June 18, 2010, 11:48:27 AM

Explanation from FIFA: Foul on Edu during the free kick, not an offside call.
TERRIBLE CALL!!!!  There was no damn foul, he won position that's it!!!!!  Cost us the game...

DiaperDandy

Why do I feel like the US always gets jobbed in international soccer, especially in games not played in the US.  Last world cup it was the Italy game...this year the Slovenia game.  So bogus.

damuts222

 Well it seems as if the referees are becoming noticed in these games and that is not good regardless of what sport you are watching. Call the game the same for the entirety of the game, don't pick your spots.
Twitta Tracka of the Year Award Recipient 2016

WellsstreetWanderer

Announcer called the referee many disparaging words. The guy was over his head but he didn't cost us a win .
Poor play in the first half was on us.

caltruda

What makes that "call" all the more galling is this was the ref who worked the African Cup of Nations final. He's done big games before. Sad, but the US never should have put itself in an 0-2 hole like that. Oh well, root for the Desert Foxes to stun the world and pick up a point this afternoon and then go balls-out for a two-goal victory for the US in the group finale to get through.

MerrittsMustache

Quote from: DiaperDandy on June 18, 2010, 12:00:06 PM
Why do I feel like the US always gets jobbed in international soccer, especially in games not played in the US.  Last world cup it was the Italy game...this year the Slovenia game.  So bogus.

Because a lot of other countries hate the US and international sports are more crooked than the NBA Playoffs.

Henry Sugar

Posnanski is the best.  I'm not sure I agree that this was that historic, but still, I like his stuff

http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2010/06/18/the-goal-that-wasnt/
A warrior is an empowered and compassionate protector of others.

GGGG

Quote from: caltruda on June 18, 2010, 12:45:30 PM
What makes that "call" all the more galling is this was the ref who worked the African Cup of Nations final. He's done big games before. Sad, but the US never should have put itself in an 0-2 hole like that. Oh well, root for the Desert Foxes to stun the world and pick up a point this afternoon and then go balls-out for a two-goal victory for the US in the group finale to get through.


Regardless of today's outcome, a two goal win v. Algeria clinches it for us.

StillAWarrior

Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on June 18, 2010, 01:27:45 PM

Regardless of today's outcome, a two goal win v. Algeria clinches it for us.

I've been trying to work that out in my head, but that's a succinct and correct statement.  Thanks.  In the case of a three-way tie at the top, goal differential will be the key and Slovenia's goal differential will be +1.  Therefore, a +2 differential for USA will do it.

After watching the replay of the goal, I'm still shocked by the call.
Never wrestle with a pig.  You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.

ChicosBailBonds

Quote from: StillAWarrior on June 18, 2010, 01:39:11 PM
I've been trying to work that out in my head, but that's a succinct and correct statement.  Thanks.  In the case of a three-way tie at the top, goal differential will be the key and Slovenia's goal differential will be +1.  Therefore, a +2 differential for USA will do it.

After watching the replay of the goal, I'm still shocked by the call.

What if there is a 3 way tie and goal differential tie?

reinko

Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on June 18, 2010, 01:52:20 PM
What if there is a 3 way tie and goal differential tie?

I believe total goals scored, then perhaps FIFA ranking?

StillAWarrior

Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on June 18, 2010, 01:52:20 PM
What if there is a 3 way tie and goal differential tie?

Reinko is correct -- total goals.  Fortunately, Slovenia win against Algeria was 1-0.  Right now, we're tied with Slovenia in total goals.  So, if USA wins 1-0 and England and Slovenia tie 1-1 (assuming an England win today), we will have a three way tie where USA and Slovenia also would be tied on points; differential and total goals.  If England's win over Algeria happened to be 1-0, we'd have  with all three teams tied in points, differential and total goals.

Here's a link to the tie breaking rules.  It gets confusing after the first three.  If I'm reading it correctly, it might result in a tie and FIFA would draw straws?!!  We're screwed if it gets to that point.

USA just needs to win 2-0 against Algeria to make everything very simple.
Never wrestle with a pig.  You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.

StillAWarrior

England is still struggling with Algeria...a tie (or worse) there would help USA's cause.

Also, one of England's defenders (Carragher) just got his second yellow card and will sit for the game against Slovenia.  Not sure how important he is to their team.
Never wrestle with a pig.  You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.

MUfan12

Quote from: Henry Sugar on June 18, 2010, 01:18:43 PM
Posnanski is the best.  I'm not sure I agree that this was that historic, but still, I like his stuff

http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2010/06/18/the-goal-that-wasnt/

Fantastic article. And yes, this would have been historic. No team in 80 years has come back from 2-0 down to win at the World Cup.

reinko

Sorry, I'm mobile right now, best for USA is that Algeria/UK tie, or an Algeria win?

Thanks!

USA! USA! USA!

damuts222

Carragher is useless, there better off without him. England's defense is not very strong as I believe they asked Carragher to come back to international play as he sat out last world cup. He lacks speed to cover pretty much anyone one on one.
Twitta Tracka of the Year Award Recipient 2016

GGGG

Quote from: reinko on June 18, 2010, 02:56:24 PM
Sorry, I'm mobile right now, best for USA is that Algeria/UK tie, or an Algeria win?


Tie.  Then the US only has to win to advance and can still advance on a draw.  If Algeria wins, a draw does nothing for us in the final game.

StillAWarrior

0-0 tie.  Great result for USA.  Win, and we're through.  Tie, and we're through if England loses.  We'd even advance on a tie if England/Slovenia tie as long as England doesn't score too many since we're ahead of them 3-1 for goals in the tournament.
Never wrestle with a pig.  You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.

brewcity77

Quote from: DiaperDandy on June 18, 2010, 12:00:06 PM
Why do I feel like the US always gets jobbed in international soccer, especially in games not played in the US.  Last world cup it was the Italy game...this year the Slovenia game.  So bogus.

Don't forget the missed handball against Germany in 2002. German midfielder Torsten Frings literally slapped a clear goal off the line to prevent us from reaching the semifinal. This was an awful call, but I'm over it. We still have our destiny in our hands thanks to Algeria and this call has provided more domestic interest in the World Cup than any time since 1994. If we can't beat Algeria, we don't deserve to advance (though depending on other results, we still could).

Previous topic - Next topic