collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

More conference realignment talk by DFW HOYA
[July 03, 2025, 07:58:45 PM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by Jay Bee
[July 03, 2025, 07:54:19 PM]


Marquette freshmen at Goolsby's 7/12 by MU Fan in Connecticut
[July 03, 2025, 04:04:32 PM]


EA Sports College Basketball Is Back by Jay Bee
[July 02, 2025, 11:35:01 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

reinko


GGGG

Actually SacWarrior, the best scenario is for some MU scientist to genetically develop a pink unicorn that craps money.  That's got about as much chance as happening as your suggestion.

ZiggysFryBoy


HouWarrior

Quote from: Marquette84 on March 29, 2010, 06:20:18 PM
Who says we need a stadium like Minnesota's?  Two other BCS football stadiums have opened recently:

Akron (capacity 30,000):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/InfoCision_Stadium_%E2%80%93_Summa_Field
Completed in 2009 for $61.6 million.  

Central Florida (capacity 45,000):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bright_House_Networks_Stadium
Completed in 2007 for $55 Million

Its a nice straw man to pick out the most expensive new college football stadium of the last decade--perhaps ever--then casually suggest that we should "plan on" spending $25 to $50 million more.

In reality, we would build a more modest facility that is a) similar to Akron's or UCF's and b) will be dual-use, incorporating the Soccer facility we're already planning to build.









You confuse NCAA div 1 w bcs
The BE is a bcs conf and minn in big ten in is a bcs conf. neither akron, nor ucf are in bcs conf. its not a straw man its apples to apples
there is a big divide  in scope/cost of football below bcs. If MU wanted div 2 football such could be done-- but at great sacrfice risk to MU in BE for BB. few if any schools operate in div 2 in football and div 1 in bb. No BCS conf has any div 2 programs
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.

GGGG

Quote from: houwarrior on March 30, 2010, 12:39:56 PM
You confuse NCAA div 1 w bcs
The BE is a bcs conf and minn in big ten in is a bcs conf. neither akron, nor ucf are in bcs conf. its not a straw man its apples to apples
there is a big divide  in scope/cost of football below bcs. If MU wanted div 2 football such could be done-- but at great sacrfice risk to MU in BE for BB. few if any schools operate in div 2 in football and div 1 in bb. No BCS conf has any div 2 programs



MU could not be D2 in football.  They would have to play FCS (old D1A) either scholarship or non-scholarship.

Marquette84

Quote from: houwarrior on March 30, 2010, 12:39:56 PM
You confuse NCAA div 1 w bcs
The BE is a bcs conf and minn in big ten in is a bcs conf. neither akron, nor ucf are in bcs conf. its not a straw man its apples to apples
there is a big divide  in scope/cost of football below bcs. If MU wanted div 2 football such could be done-- but at great sacrfice risk to MU in BE for BB. few if any schools operate in div 2 in football and div 1 in bb. No BCS conf has any div 2 programs


Sorry, but you are the one who is mistaken.

Check out www.bcsfootball.org.
http://www.bcsfootball.org/news/story?id=4809755

Akron is the the MAC. UCF is in CUSA  Both are in BCS conferences (although neither is in an automatically qualifying conference).

I would also suggest that you check out the NCAA site for the FBS list BCS teams)
http://web1.ncaa.org/onlineDir/exec/sponsorship?sortOrder=0&division=1A&sport=MFB

You'll note that Akron, UCF and Minnesota are all on this list.












Litehouse

Quote from: wildbill sb on March 29, 2010, 05:44:39 PM
Boston College?  Tulane?  Brigham Young?  Pitt?  Syracuse?

Pitt is public.

Tulane probably loses more money than Duke each year.  I don't know specifics, but I would guess Syracuse and BYU lose money also, and BC might be close to break-even.

Brewtown Andy

I can't believe this thread is still going with legitimate discussions.
Twitter - @brewtownandy
Anonymous Eagle

ZiggysFryBoy

Quote from: Brewtown Andy on March 30, 2010, 04:02:20 PM
I can't believe this thread is still going with legitimate discussions.

I'd only support football if they changed the name back to warriors and let a fan throw a tomahawk through the uprights at half time.

Avenue Commons

Quote from: Brewtown Andy on March 29, 2010, 09:22:18 AM
More like $200 million.  You forgot the stadium.

The number is $100 million.

It is not going to happen. Not to name drop, but Cottingham and Cords have each personally told me it is simply not going to happen.
We Are Marquette

mu72warrior

Quote from: MerrittsMustache on March 29, 2010, 03:17:00 PM
Huh? If it wasn't for the non-sensical Top Ten list posted the other day, this might have been the worst attempt at humor I've seen on here in a long, long time.

Previous topic - Next topic