collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by Mutaman
[Today at 12:27:23 AM]


Recruiting as of 7/15/25 by noblewarrior
[July 20, 2025, 08:36:58 PM]


NM by Uncle Rico
[July 20, 2025, 01:53:37 PM]


Scholarship Table by muwarrior69
[July 20, 2025, 11:09:38 AM]


MU @ TBT? by Uncle Rico
[July 20, 2025, 06:29:25 AM]


Open practice by jfp61
[July 19, 2025, 10:03:37 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

PGsHeroes32

when do you guys think MU can be not only a realistic top 20 team for a seasons length but also a consistent DEEP tourny run team and possible National Title contender, with the direction we are headed Im starting to feel like we are not far away. What do you guys think?
Lazar picking up where the BIG 3 left off....

Spaniel with a Short Tail

Not next year.  Maybe the following year.

4everwarriors

Just as soon as the Easter bunny drops some stud big men our way to go along with our already fine assortment of guards.
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

Josey Wales

#3
The year after next, DJO is a senior, Van Blue is a sophomore, buzz will have a stud big man in, and otule and yous will be serviceable at least.
BEARS STILL SUCK

Hey Vikings, I like what you've done with the basement.

"Lazar Hayward. The L stands for leader, and the W stands for winner, Lazar Hayward is a winner."

flash

It is hard to say, but probably in 2 years when DJO is a senoir.  I could see him averaging 20 pts a game. 

PGsHeroes32

I can definitly see that from DJO. When you guys say two year do you actually view us as a legit title threat, or just top 20 team with Sweet 16/Elite 8 hopes?


If the tournament is indeed expanding we dont have to really worry about making it, even next year in a unpredictable season for us.
Lazar picking up where the BIG 3 left off....

bilsu

Not until we have 3 McDonald's all-americans on our team.

CAINMUTINY

As soon as we land a serviceable big man; its our missing link at this point.

Josey Wales

Quote from: HaywardsHeroes32 on March 22, 2010, 10:16:45 PM
When you guys say two year do you actually view us as a legit title threat, or just top 20 team with Sweet 16/Elite 8 hopes?


If DJO scores 20+ per game and keeps improving on D. If Van Blue is the next great MU guard since Wade. If Yous turns into Thabeet. If Someone else steps up big time (erik williams, jamail jones). If we develop a good point (either Caddy or Smith) And if we have a deep bench, we will be a title contender. These are a lot of huge IFs.

Even if these don't happen, I could see us making a couple deep tourney runs in the next 2+ years as long as Buzz is here.
BEARS STILL SUCK

Hey Vikings, I like what you've done with the basement.

"Lazar Hayward. The L stands for leader, and the W stands for winner, Lazar Hayward is a winner."

wojosdojo

Quote from: bilsu on March 22, 2010, 10:26:10 PM
Not until we have 3 McDonald's all-americans on our team.

Please tell me you forgot to use teal.
1. Last year we were on our way to a 3 seed until DJ went down
2. What does GT have? 3 of them? How far did they go? The last 2 years?
3. UNC looked good this year with all those MAA. Pause not.

Bottom line is with hard work we can go anywhere (in yrs to come). 

ChicosBailBonds

As soon as we sign more white guys and change our name to Northern Iowa or Cornell. 

Nukem2

Next year MU will feature a team with very limited experience.  Butler has 1 and 1/2 years true experience.  DJO, Buycks and Fulce have 1 year (Joe was injured his first year and hardly played other than at Providence).  The soph class of Otule, Cadougan, Mbao and Williams realistically has zero on-court experience, but do have the experience of being in the program.  The newbies ( Crowder, Blue, Newbill, Smith and Jones) are obviously starting from scratch.  This has to one of the least experienced teams in the country next year and a team with huge questions in the post with the departure of Hayward.

This team will be fun to watch.  But, its going to be hard to accomplish what was accomplished this past season.  Could be a bumpy ride.

TJ

Quote from: Nukem2 on March 23, 2010, 10:27:17 AM
This team will be fun to watch.  But, its going to be hard to accomplish what was accomplished this past season.  Could be a bumpy ride.
We're already playing down the expectations for next year?  There is no reason we can't be just as successful next year as we have been this year.  Losing Hayward and Acker will hurt, but it's not like they're being replaced with chopped liver.  The incoming class looks good.  We have some guys returning from injury in Junior and Otule.  We have a solid core in Butler and DJO, along with a hopefully improved senior Buycks and a nice role player in Fulce.  Williams might start to show some improvement.

I don't expect a Final Four, but I completely expect next year's team to accomplish at least what this year's team did: compete every game, stay in the top half of the Big East, and make the tournament.

speri

Quote from: bilsu on March 22, 2010, 10:26:10 PM
Not until we have 3 McDonald's all-americans on our team.

http://newsok.com/three-oklahoma-mens-basketball-players-might-be-on-way-out/article/3448479?custom_click=lead_story_title

Just want to point out that having three AA is not sure fire ticket to success.  Oklahoma went 4-12 this season with three AA and their program is imploding.

redbirdwarrior

I agree that losing all three seniors will impact next year, but the Warriors will be MUCH deeper next year.  That alone buoys my hopes.  I, for one, will expect a deeper run in the NCAA tourney than this year.  It's funny that this was supposed to be a rebuilding year and Marquette won 22 games, so now some think next year is the rebuilding year.  I think Kentucky this year and Memphis a few years ago showed that young teams can win.  (And I know that we won't have Rose or Wall on next year's team.  I also know that all of our players will have taken their own SATs/ACTs.)  Add a stud in the middle, either from development from current guys or a real stud signing, and Marquette can start the annual Elite 8 march in two years.

ErickJD08

If we want to be "realistic", stop talking about annual tourney performances.  Tourney is a crap shoot.  Lets talk about regular season performances with NCAA appearances.  I think we will be strong next season but so will alot of other teams in the Big East.  Next year, we will not be "deep".  We will play eight players consistently and nine in a blow out.  We will be lucky if Blue can contribute next season.  The JUCO's will play the same roles that DJO and Butler played their first seasons.  I do like the competition for starting roles next year.  That will be good for everyone.
Wanna learn how to say "@#(@# (@*" in a dozen languages... go to Professor Crass www.professorcrass.com

Nukem2

Quote from: TJ on March 23, 2010, 10:47:34 AM
We're already playing down the expectations for next year?  There is no reason we can't be just as successful next year as we have been this year.  Losing Hayward and Acker will hurt, but it's not like they're being replaced with chopped liver.  The incoming class looks good.  We have some guys returning from injury in Junior and Otule.  We have a solid core in Butler and DJO, along with a hopefully improved senior Buycks and a nice role player in Fulce.  Williams might start to show some improvement.

I don't expect a Final Four, but I completely expect next year's team to accomplish at least what this year's team did: compete every game, stay in the top half of the Big East, and make the tournament.
Who is downplaying expectations?  The reality is that this will be a very inexperienced team next season.  Certainly I have high hopes; but, it could take a while to get going and the road could well be very bumpy.  That was true this past season as well.  The senior class pulled its weight.  the question is whether next year's seniors (and juniors) can do the same or if the newbies will make a significant contribution to help bridge the gap.  Stay tuned.

Dawson Rental

Quote from: speri on March 23, 2010, 10:57:04 AM
http://newsok.com/three-oklahoma-mens-basketball-players-might-be-on-way-out/article/3448479?custom_click=lead_story_title

Just want to point out that having three AA is not sure fire ticket to success.  Oklahoma went 4-12 this season with three AA and their program is imploding.

All right!  That has to make us the leader for Reggie Murphy, right?
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

Dawson Rental

Quote from: ErickJD08 on March 23, 2010, 02:45:53 PM
If we want to be "realistic", stop talking about annual tourney performances.  Tourney is a crap shoot.  Lets talk about regular season performances with NCAA appearances.  I think we will be strong next season but so will alot of other teams in the Big East.  Next year, we will not be "deep".  We will play eight players consistently and nine in a blow out.  We will be lucky if Blue can contribute next season.  The JUCO's will play the same roles that DJO and Butler played their first seasons.  I do like the competition for starting roles next year.  That will be good for everyone.

I think that you will be pleasantly surprised by Mr. Blue.  Other than that, I have to say that you appear to be one smart donkey!
You actually have a degree from Marquette?

Quote from: muguru
No...and after reading many many psosts from people on this board that do...I have to say I'm MUCH better off, if this is the type of "intelligence" a degree from MU gets you. It sure is on full display I will say that.

mug644

#19
Quote from: ErickJD08 on March 23, 2010, 02:45:53 PM
If we want to be "realistic", stop talking about annual tourney performances.  Tourney is a crap shoot.  Lets talk about regular season performances with NCAA appearances.

From this point of view, I would say that we've already achieved the level of quality and consistency that the original poster was asking about (though he was obviously referring to rankings and tournament performance).

The statistic that only MU and Pitt have won at least 10 BEast games each season since the expansion remains impressive (though not necessarily one to hang a banner about). We have not (yet!) won the regular season nor BEast tournament championships, but our consistency is quite high. Can we keep it up? Can we have those 'peak' seasons where one or both of those happen? Can we parlay our league success into NCAA tourney success with deep runs?

I, like everyone here, certainly hope so. More, I believe we can and will maintain that consistency and will have peak seasons. I look forward to them!!

Norm

Quote from: redbirdwarrior on March 23, 2010, 02:11:09 PM
I agree that losing all three seniors will impact next year, but the Warriors will be MUCH deeper next year.  That alone buoys my hopes.  I, for one, will expect a deeper run in the NCAA tourney than this year.  It's funny that this was supposed to be a rebuilding year and Marquette won 22 games, so now some think next year is the rebuilding year.  I think Kentucky this year and Memphis a few years ago showed that young teams can win.  (And I know that we won't have Rose or Wall on next year's team.  I also know that all of our players will have taken their own SATs/ACTs.)  Add a stud in the middle, either from development from current guys or a real stud signing, and Marquette can start the annual Elite 8 march in two years.

I think the fact that Cadougan, Williams, Mbao and Otule never really played this year leads people to think next year will be the rebuilding year, as it was expected all would contribute this year and get some experience under their belts. As such, these four are delayed in their development and next year could be the rebuilding year, especially with the loss of Hayward, Cubillian and Acker.

PuertoRicanNightmare

Quote from: Squawking Chickens on March 22, 2010, 10:49:09 PM
If Van Blue is the next great MU guard since Wade.
I think the next great MU guard is already on the team. It's DJO.

If Blue can approach DJO's ability, I'll be very, very happy.

Norm

DJO needs to get that aggressiveness and fearlessness that Wade had. So far he is too inconsistent to be compared to Wade.

4everwarriors

DJO can't carry Wade's jockstrap.
"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

NersEllenson

Quote from: 4everwarriors on March 24, 2010, 10:22:41 AM
DJO can't carry Wade's jockstrap.
No player in the world can carry DWade's jockstrap!!  Other than LeBron, there is not a more efficient, effective player in the NBA/world.  DJO is the best guard at MU since D-Wade - he won't ever be as effective of slasher as DWade was, as DWade had a great body/lower center of gravity than DJO, which allowed DWade to get low to the ground and make unbelievable drives baseline/everywhere else.  But, DWade never had near the 3 point shot DJO did in his 2 years are Marquette.  DJO will be a major stud his senior year at MU, and will exceed what McNeal or Matthews accomplished as seniors.  I bet DJO is good for 20ppg and 6/7 assists per game as a senior.  He's already a better creator/passer than Jerel or Wes were..
"I'm not sure Cadougan would fix the problems on this team. I'm not even convinced he would be better for this team than DeWil is."

BrewCity77, December 8, 2013

Previous topic - Next topic