collapse

Resources

Stud of St. John's Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross5
James Jr3
Parham1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 1/15/26 by willie warrior
[Today at 02:46:45 PM]


Shaka Smart 02/18/2026 by wiscwarrior
[Today at 01:49:43 PM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by MU82
[Today at 12:07:48 PM]


Transfers in/out 2025-2026 by willie warrior
[Today at 11:59:04 AM]


Georgetown game roll call 2026 by 18thandWells
[Today at 11:20:15 AM]


James/Stevens by Newsdreams
[February 22, 2026, 07:33:30 PM]


We're 3rd best! by Pakuni
[February 22, 2026, 05:04:29 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up:  @ Georgetown

Marquette
70
Marquette @
Georgetown
Date/Time: Feb 24, 2026, 6:00pm
TV: NBC SN
Schedule for 2025-26
St. John's
76

mwbauer7

LAST FOUR IN
Ole Miss
Charlotte
Oklahoma State
Marquette

Detailed Rundown

Marquette
No one is talking much about Marquette, which has quietly won four in a row. The remaining schedule is also fairly benign.

Seed Report:
S-Curve history: 66 (Nov. 9), 78 (Dec. 15), 79 (Jan. 4), 72 (Jan. 11), 68 (Jan. 18), 74 (Jan. 25), 68 (Feb. 1), 66 (Feb. 8), 47 (Feb. 12).

Bracket Bytes:
Odds to remain in NCAA field: 55 percent.

Good Wins

RPI 1-25: N-Xavier, Georgetown
RPI 26-50: none

Bad Losses

RPI 101-200: NC State, @DePaul
RPI 201+: none

edit: Should mention we are playing as a 12 seed (how perfect would that be?) against 5th seeded Temple in NOLA.

LON

Quote from: mwbauer7 on February 12, 2010, 11:42:56 AM
LAST FOUR IN
Ole Miss
Charlotte
Oklahoma State
Marquette

Detailed Rundown

Marquette
No one is talking much about Marquette, which has quietly won four in a row. The remaining schedule is also fairly benign.

Seed Report:
S-Curve history: 66 (Nov. 9), 78 (Dec. 15), 79 (Jan. 4), 72 (Jan. 11), 68 (Jan. 18), 74 (Jan. 25), 68 (Feb. 1), 66 (Feb. 8), 47 (Feb. 12).

Bracket Bytes:
Odds to remain in NCAA field: 55 percent.

Good Wins

RPI 1-25: N-Xavier, Georgetown
RPI 26-50: none

Bad Losses

RPI 101-200: NC State, @DePaul
RPI 201+: none

Can someone give a really brief explanation on how that S-Curve works...

The change from 66 to 47 is what I'm specifically referring to.  Is that because we had some teams that had beneficial losses in the last few days (beneficial to MU, that is)?

ZiggysFryBoy

the s curve is ranking teams 1-65 and then snaking back and forth, so 1, 2,3,4 are all 1 seeds, then snaking back is 5,6,7,8, so the 8th best team is matched up opposite the best team.

it's like a fantasy football draft, if you've done one of those.

Brewtown Andy

Quote from: LancesOtherNut on February 12, 2010, 11:50:51 AM
Can someone give a really brief explanation on how that S-Curve works...

The change from 66 to 47 is what I'm specifically referring to.  Is that because we had some teams that had beneficial losses in the last few days (beneficial to MU, that is)?


The S-Curve is the "natural" seeding lines.  Teams 1-4 are the 1 seeds, 5-8 are the 2s, etc.  For fairness' sake, you want the #8 team (the worst two seed) to end up in the same region as the #1 team (the best 1 seed).  Sometimes teams have to be moved for procedural reasons, so the Curve allows you to see "oh, well, they're really a 7, but had to be an 8 to stop too many Big 12 teams in that bracket" or whatever.

A 20 spot jump is rare, especially when a team doesn't play a game between brackets, so I'm guessing this one is completely about what's been happening with everyone else.
Twitter - @brewtownandy
Anonymous Eagle

LON


wiscoave

Can someone post the link to the full bracket? I cant find it on espn...

DJO's Pump Fake


MUFan07

Quote from: Brewtown Andy on February 12, 2010, 11:57:53 AM
The S-Curve is the "natural" seeding lines.  Teams 1-4 are the 1 seeds, 5-8 are the 2s, etc.  For fairness' sake, you want the #8 team (the worst two seed) to end up in the same region as the #1 team (the best 1 seed).  Sometimes teams have to be moved for procedural reasons, so the Curve allows you to see "oh, well, they're really a 7, but had to be an 8 to stop too many Big 12 teams in that bracket" or whatever.

A 20 spot jump is rare, especially when a team doesn't play a game between brackets, so I'm guessing this one is completely about what's been happening with everyone else.

Our 20 spot jump is mainly due to us being in as opposed to out.  #66 is that first team out.  However, now that we are in the field of 65 we jump to #47 because there are several Automatic bids that will be seeded below us.

KipsBayEagle

If this bracket were to materialize and come true, I think most intelligent fans would pick Marquette to get to the sweet 16.
Side note:  Lazar hayward looks like he is going to kill someone on the espn college basketball homepage

MUfan12

I would kill for this draw.

And a weekend in New Orleans... please let this happen.

MU B2002

Vanderbilt is not exactly a pushover.
"VPI"
- Mike Hunt

copious1218

Quote from: MU_B2002 on February 12, 2010, 12:18:38 PM
Vanderbilt is not exactly a pushover.

Nor is Temple - they knocked off Nova early in the year and lost to G'Town by 1.

Sir Lawrence

On another sidenote, it doesn't look like Joe Lunardi has missed many meals lately.....
Ludum habemus.

KipsBayEagle

No teams a pushover once you get in the tournament.  That being said, could you ask for a more favorable draw for a 12 seed?

KC_Warrior

Quote from: MUfan12 on February 12, 2010, 12:17:09 PM
I would kill for this draw.

And a weekend in New Orleans... please let this happen.

Agreed.  A 5-12 game vs. Temple in NOLA...where do I sign up? 

Aughnanure

Wow. Lazar does looks like an absolute beast.
“All men dream; but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act out their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible.” - T.E. Lawrence

Strokin 3s

What I don't get is under the last 4 in it has Ole Miss and Charlotte listed along with MU and Oklahoma St.  However, Ole Miss and Charlotte are 11 seeds and MU and OSU 12.  Shouldn't all 4 truly be 12's if they are the last 4 in?

MU B2002

#17
edit


nm
"VPI"
- Mike Hunt

KipsBayEagle

League bids would cut into 12 seeds.

copious1218

Quote from: Strokin 3s on February 12, 2010, 12:57:52 PM
What I don't get is under the last 4 in it has Ole Miss and Charlotte listed along with MU and Oklahoma St.  However, Ole Miss and Charlotte are 11 seeds and MU and OSU 12.  Shouldn't all 4 truly be 12's if they are the last 4 in?

Not to mention, there could be some movement for conflict reasons.

StillAWarrior

#20
I've said it before, and I'll say it again now:  I think Marquette has benefitted from those close losses.  They got so much press from being the "unluckiest" team and I think that is helping them and will help them in the long run.  We've had articles about our coach, Lazar on the front page of ESPN's basketball page, etc.  I think we've gotten more coverage than your average 15-8 team (maybe because we're not an average 15-8 team).

They still have to take care of business, but I think the publicity surrounding all of those heart breaking losses will help this team.

Edited to add:  of course I'd rather have won those games.  But here's an interesting question - what do you think would have helped this team more:  an unremarkable 4 point win over NC State which wouldn't have really garnered any attention and might have reduced the publicity this team has received (resulting in a current record of 16-7) or the publicity the team has received and the reputation of being better than our record indicates?
Never wrestle with a pig.  You both get dirty, and the pig likes it.

94Warrior

We would have benefited more from winning.  A win is ALWAYS better than a loss.  If we were 7-4 or 8-3 in conference we would be in better shape.  Same with having one more non-conference win.

As others have said, I'll happily take a 12 seed against Temple right now.

Hards Alumni

Quote from: 94Warrior on February 12, 2010, 02:02:10 PM
We would have benefited more from winning.  A win is ALWAYS better than a loss.  If we were 7-4 or 8-3 in conference we would be in better shape.  Same with having one more non-conference win.

As others have said, I'll happily take a 12 seed against Temple right now.

Hey, stop stealing John Madden's logic.

Skatastrophy

Quote from: Hards_Alumni on February 12, 2010, 02:03:34 PM
Hey, stop stealing John Madden's logic.

You see... what Marquette has to do here is score more points than the other team!!

Brewtown Andy

Quote from: Strokin 3s on February 12, 2010, 12:57:52 PM
What I don't get is under the last 4 in it has Ole Miss and Charlotte listed along with MU and Oklahoma St.  However, Ole Miss and Charlotte are 11 seeds and MU and OSU 12.  Shouldn't all 4 truly be 12's if they are the last 4 in?

Nope.  If enough mid to low major conference leaders (1 bid automatic qualifiers are covered by the current leaders) are deserving of a seed higher than 11 or 12, then they get them. 
Twitter - @brewtownandy
Anonymous Eagle

Previous topic - Next topic