collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 5/15/25 by onepost
[May 13, 2025, 11:23:07 PM]


Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by DoctorV
[May 13, 2025, 09:50:25 PM]


Pearson to MU by willie warrior
[May 13, 2025, 06:07:05 PM]


Mid-season grades by Jay Bee
[May 13, 2025, 02:05:55 PM]


Kam update by MUbiz
[May 13, 2025, 01:53:14 PM]


NIL Money by The Sultan
[May 13, 2025, 01:03:40 PM]


Marquette/Indiana Finalizing Agreement by PointWarrior
[May 13, 2025, 09:52:07 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


MARQKC

East Stroudsburg University (D-II, Pennsylvania) figured out how to keep the Warrior name:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/14/sports/14mascot.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=east%20stroudsberg%20video&st=cse

An excerpt from the story:

East Stroudsburg had gone years without a costumed mascot. In 1995, as public sentiment nationally shifted against team nicknames that could be considered racially offensive, the university retained the Warriors name but shed its longstanding American Indian imagery. Leaving Warriors to the imagination frustrated alumni who saw the change as a bow to political correctness.

"We're not getting rid of the concept of Warriors," Doreen Tobin, the vice president for student affairs, said in September. "But we're also not going back to the Native American concept. We're going to do what's best interest of the entire community."

Be sure to watch the video.




Ahoya06

Exactly the message we were trying to get across back in '05...

dsfire


jce

Quote from: Ahoya06 on December 15, 2008, 01:24:11 PM
Exactly the message we were trying to get across back in '05...


Look, the problem in '05 was that the University paid all this lip service to shedding the name Warriors back in the early 90s as the only true way it could rid itself of the negative Native imagery it used earlier.  The logic was flawed back in the early 90s no doubt...but the University wasn't going to say "Well, it was all DiUlio's fault" and reverse its decision 15 years later.

MU gimp ONE

the problem was that there were so many people rocking the warrior-native american stuff that it made it clear MU could never separate from the imagery.  personally, I'm a golden eagle and i wish they would have just left well enough alone. 
"You know, most people would kill... to be treated like a god, just for a few moments." - Coach Norman Dale

RedWebster

No...the problem is that nobody has an image OTHER than a Native American to associate with Warriors. If Marquette provided one, it would be embraced. Until another Warrior image is put forth, you'll see more Willie Wampum shirts than Golden Eagles.

I'd also love to hear somebody explain in logical terms how describing somebody as a "Warrior" -- be it black, white, Native American, Asian, Greek...anybody -- is offensive.

MU B2002

"VPI"
- Mike Hunt

ChicosBailBonds

Quote from: MU gimp ONE on December 15, 2008, 02:15:07 PM
the problem was that there were so many people rocking the warrior-native american stuff that it made it clear MU could never separate from the imagery.  personally, I'm a golden eagle and i wish they would have just left well enough alone. 

And that would be fixed in a New York second by keeping Warriors and just providing a new symbol to associate it with.  It would have been very simple and easily done.

You don't see Golden State Warriors fans with the old Warriors Indian heads on their sweatshirts, t-shirts, etc.  They attach the new logo to it.

jce

When I was a student there (87-91) I distinctly remember them trying to have different imagery for the Warrior logo.  I remember voting on a new mascot in a poll sponsored by the Marquette Tribune, including a knight, etc.  I think this is the process that gave us that lame, Grover-looking thing.  (Or maybe it was the process to try to replace it...)

To this day I believe that was DiUlio's baby.  Just like his idea for closing Wisconsin Avenue through campus, he had bold ideas without the political savy to understand their consequences.  I don't care if MU had come up with an alternative, he was going to have the name changed.

And that's why he didn't last very long.  But Father Wild and the BoT weren't going to hang him out to dry on the issue.

muwarrior87

Quote from: RedWebster on December 15, 2008, 02:34:19 PM
No...the problem is that nobody has an image OTHER than a Native American to associate with Warriors. If Marquette provided one, it would be embraced. Until another Warrior image is put forth, you'll see more Willie Wampum shirts than Golden Eagles.

I'd also love to hear somebody explain in logical terms how describing somebody as a "Warrior" -- be it black, white, Native American, Asian, Greek...anybody -- is offensive.

Uh, I'm pretty sure there's a damn good example of a Warrior right on Marquette's campus in St. Joan of Arc Chapel.

TallTitan34

#10
Quote from: Pastor of Muppets on December 15, 2008, 04:16:20 PM
I remember voting on a new mascot in a poll sponsored by the Marquette Tribune, including a knight, etc.  I think this is the process that gave us that lame, Grover-looking thing.  (Or maybe it was the process to try to replace it...)

Blueteaux!

I agree with the Gimp One.  While I would prefer the name Warriors, I am a Golden Eagle.  For as long as I can remember, Marquette has been the Golden Eagles.  Dwyane Wade was a Golden Eagle.   

The majority of current students who say they identify more with Warriors than Golden Eagles are full of it.  I know some current students grew up going to games while they were the Warriors and I will give them that they identify with Warriors.  But the majority of students probably didn't even know about the name Warriors until after arriving at Marquette.

I also agree that if Marquette were to have switched the logo and kept the name Warriors, the Native American imagery would drop significantly.  People would buy memorabilia with the new mascot in masses.  Indian head shirts would still be seen, but they are still seen today as well and we aren't even the Warriors!

Wareagle

Quote from: TallTitan34 on December 15, 2008, 05:08:28 PM

I also agree that if Marquette were to have switched the logo and kept the name Warriors, the Native American imagery would drop significantly. 
That would really be all that would have to happen to make the whole thing palatable to the pc masses.  Make the logo a knight, or something resembling a spartan from 300 and the problem is solved.

chapman

Quote from: TallTitan34 on December 15, 2008, 05:08:28 PM
Blueteaux!

I agree with the Gimp One.  While I would prefer the name Warriors, I am a Golden Eagle.  For as long as I can remember, Marquette has been the Golden Eagles.  Dwyane Wade was a Golden Eagle.   

The majority of current students who say they identify more with Warriors than Golden Eagles are full of it.  I know some current students grew up going to games while they were the Warriors and I will give them that they identify with Warriors.  But the majority of students probably didn't even know about the name Warriors until after arriving at Marquette.

I also agree that if Marquette were to have switched the logo and kept the name Warriors, the Native American imagery would drop significantly.  People would buy memorabilia with the new mascot in masses.  Indian head shirts would still be seen, but they are still seen today as well and we aren't even the Warriors!

+1.

And on the topic of the mascot, as lame as it is I would rather have Gold N. Eagle than that Goofy/Yogi Bear thing ESU has or whatever Golden States' mascot is supposed to be.

DJO's Pump Fake

I am sure this has been debated to the high heavens before, but I just want to add my two cents.

I do not understand how or why these people can claim it offensive.  More importantly, I am glad we changed it back in the early 90s because teams like the Washington REDSKINS and the Florida State SEMINOLES and not to mention the Cleveland INDIANS are being forced to change theirs!

I am Greek and feel nothing but pride and a sense of association with teams like USC Trojans, Michigan State Spartans and so on.

This is one topic that I will never be calm about.

There I got it out....

MU B2002

Quote from: TallTitan34 on December 15, 2008, 05:08:28 PM
Blueteaux!

The majority of current students who say they identify more with Warriors than Golden Eagles are full of it. 

Agree, while I am aware of the Warrior history and issue, I feel no real connection to anything other than the Golden Eagles.

I for one think we should just be Marquette.  A name so strong that no mascot is needed.
"VPI"
- Mike Hunt

muwarrior87

Quote from: warrior55 on December 16, 2008, 10:09:01 AM
I am sure this has been debated to the high heavens before, but I just want to add my two cents.

I do not understand how or why these people can claim it offensive.  More importantly, I am glad we changed it back in the early 90s because teams like the Washington REDSKINS and the Florida State SEMINOLES and not to mention the Cleveland INDIANS are being forced to change theirs!

I am Greek and feel nothing but pride and a sense of association with teams like USC Trojans, Michigan State Spartans and so on.

This is one topic that I will never be calm about.

There I got it out....

except that the Seminole Nation said they should keep it. Thank you one Native American group with some sense of pride.

MUfan12

Quote from: warrior55 on December 16, 2008, 10:09:01 AM
I am sure this has been debated to the high heavens before, but I just want to add my two cents.

I do not understand how or why these people can claim it offensive.  More importantly, I am glad we changed it back in the early 90s because teams like the Washington REDSKINS and the Florida State SEMINOLES and not to mention the Cleveland INDIANS are being forced to change theirs!

I am Greek and feel nothing but pride and a sense of association with teams like USC Trojans, Michigan State Spartans and so on.

This is one topic that I will never be calm about.

There I got it out....

Agreed... but let's remember there is no logic in the ultra-PC crowd, especially in academia.


Ahoya06

Quote from: TallTitan34 on December 15, 2008, 05:08:28 PM
Blueteaux!

I agree with the Gimp One.  While I would prefer the name Warriors, I am a Golden Eagle.  For as long as I can remember, Marquette has been the Golden Eagles.  Dwyane Wade was a Golden Eagle.   

The majority of current students who say they identify more with Warriors than Golden Eagles are full of it.  I know some current students grew up going to games while they were the Warriors and I will give them that they identify with Warriors.  But the majority of students probably didn't even know about the name Warriors until after arriving at Marquette.

I also agree that if Marquette were to have switched the logo and kept the name Warriors, the Native American imagery would drop significantly.  People would buy memorabilia with the new mascot in masses.  Indian head shirts would still be seen, but they are still seen today as well and we aren't even the Warriors!

I do concede the notion that as the years go by, there is a growing number of new students who are Golden Eagles, and as a result identifying themselves as such.

But the fact that you (and there are MANY like you) prefer the name Warriors really says something about it all. I think very few people would protest to a return to Warriors, whereas as long as we stay the GE's, the call to change back will never die down.

When MUFan12, notkirkcameron and I ran Students For Warriors in '05, we were definitely able to prove that a large number of current students, despite having no *literal* connection to the Warriors name, wanted to see it come back. Unfortunately, these results fell on deaf ears.

As a PS, Bluteaux, in his confusing and random glory, is awesome. TT, can you get us a throwback night, and wear him to the game?

ZiggysFryBoy

Quote from: MU_B2002 on December 16, 2008, 10:13:50 AM


I for one think we should just be Marquette.  A name so strong that no mascot is needed.

+1000

muwarrior87

Quote from: Ahoya06 on December 16, 2008, 02:48:59 PM

As a PS, Bluteaux, in his confusing and random glory, is awesome. TT, can you get us a throwback night, and wear him to the game?

don't think he hasn't tried this already

LON

Am I wrong or isn't it a Native American in the boat with Fr. Marquette on the official MU seal?

Ahoya06


muwarrior87

Quote from: LancesOtherNut on December 16, 2008, 11:04:04 PM
Am I wrong or isn't it a Native American in the boat with Fr. Marquette on the official MU seal?

yup. and Fr. Marquette is pointing, telling him to row the boat in that direction

MUfan12

Quote from: muwarrior87 on December 17, 2008, 11:18:55 AM
yup. and Fr. Marquette is pointing, telling him to row the boat in that direction
Around the time of the nickname controversy, someone honestly tried to remove the Indian from the seal, saying it was a slave and demeaning.

Like I said, leave logic at the door when heading into ultra-PC academia.

jce

Quote from: Ahoya06 on December 16, 2008, 02:48:59 PM
I do concede the notion that as the years go by, there is a growing number of new students who are Golden Eagles, and as a result identifying themselves as such.

But the fact that you (and there are MANY like you) prefer the name Warriors really says something about it all. I think very few people would protest to a return to Warriors, whereas as long as we stay the GE's, the call to change back will never die down.


It was basically dead until the Trustee brought it up again.  It is dead now.  I would much rather be Warriors, but I really don't care enough to get all worked up about it.

Previous topic - Next topic