Main Menu
collapse

Resources

Stud of Creighton Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

2026 Transfer Portal Wishlist by WellsstreetWanderer
[Today at 11:41:11 AM]


Lifetime Contract Extension by Hards Alumni
[Today at 11:25:15 AM]


What would make you show Shaka the door in March? by JTJ3
[Today at 11:23:52 AM]


6th Year Players - Career Games Played by #UnleashMalik
[Today at 09:35:28 AM]


How Shaka Can Save This Season by Pakuni
[Today at 08:24:28 AM]


Marquette NBA Thread by MuggsyB
[December 25, 2025, 06:57:57 PM]


2025-26 College Hoops Thread by MuggsyB
[December 25, 2025, 12:26:10 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Seton Hall

Marquette
63
Marquette vs
Seton Hall
Date/Time: Dec 30, 2025, 6:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Creighton
84

LAZER

Quote from: swoopem on December 15, 2021, 11:08:46 AM
They should have Brett Nelson come in for a day or two and spend all day shooting. Pay him a consulting fee
He might be looking for work soon, so that could work.

jfp61

Quote from: brewcity77 on December 14, 2021, 08:56:09 AM
Marquette leads the Big East in the number of unguarded threes they get our game, but are 9th in PPP on those attempts. As players like Jones and Joplin develop into more reliable shooters and as they fill the roster with more guys that can knock down shots, that will come up and pay dividends.

My biggest concern is our unwillingness to pursue offensive rebounds. I believe it's rooted in a desire to get back into a set defense as we get killed in transition, but I think that's a misguided belief.

There's a metric called Shot Quality that looks at the expected effectiveness of shots taken and allowed. Many of the teams we'd like to emulate (Baylor, Villanova, Gonzaga, Alabama) rank highly in this regard. I looked at the top-18 (because that's what fit on the screen) adjusted Shot Quality leaders and compared them with their offensive rebounding ranks. Of the 18, 17 were in the 64th percentile or better in offensive rebounding rate, 15 were in the 77th percentile or better, and 10 were in the 90th or better percentile.

What does that mean? That any defensive efficiency loss from chasing offensive rebounds is more than offset by the offensive efficiency gained by the open looks at the perimeter and easier putbacks created by securing an offensive board.

If anyone wants to read more, I did a little thread about this with some visuals to reinforce it today.

https://twitter.com/brewcity1977/status/1470762942358507521?s=21
I think this is a personnel issue. Not enough drivers/cutters on this team to rebound shoots from. Part of the reason i am higher than most on next years two recruits. This will also take convincing Lewis to play more small ball 5 than i am sure he wants to.

Could they do better than they currently are doing, sure. But i dont see the path to actually accomplishing this at a high level without some outer body experiences from Oso.

Previous topic - Next topic