collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

Nash Walker commits to MU by JakeBarnes
[Today at 11:00:36 PM]


Marquette freshmen at Goolsby's 7/12 by BCHoopster
[Today at 10:13:46 PM]


Kam update by MuggsyB
[Today at 02:51:24 PM]


More conference realignment talk by The Sultan
[Today at 01:03:14 PM]


IU vs MU preview by tower912
[Today at 10:18:57 AM]


2025-26 Schedule by MarquetteMike1977
[Today at 12:46:59 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


WarriorDad

Quote from: Jay Bee on March 04, 2018, 02:08:35 PM
In theory, recent games do mean more. On the team sheets, rankings of a predictive model are used, and that model includes a recency bias.

You have more knowledge on this than I and would enjoy understanding more if you can shed some light.  When you say team sheets, do you mean these?  https://i.turner.ncaa.com/sites/default/files/images/2017/12/04/team_sheet_guide1.pdf

The rankings of predictive models you mention, are those boxes 4, 5 and 6?  I did not realize those predictive models have added values or a recency bias built in, am I understanding you correctly based on your comments?

In last months SI they were saying no recency bias exists and that seems to line up with the CBS article, so there is some confusion based on the mock seeding exercise the committee at the time.    https://www.si.com/college-basketball/2018/02/12/ncaa-tournament-seeding-bracket-top-16-breakdown-march-madness
"No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth."
— Plato

Previous topic - Next topic