collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

Pearson to MU by MarquetteMike1977
[July 16, 2025, 10:19:36 PM]


NM by MarquetteMike1977
[July 16, 2025, 10:13:56 PM]


TBT by Uncle Rico
[July 16, 2025, 08:35:17 PM]


Psyched about the future of Marquette hoops by wadesworld
[July 16, 2025, 02:53:20 PM]


Scholarship Table by Nukem2
[July 16, 2025, 10:25:43 AM]


Marquette NBA Thread by Jay Bee
[July 16, 2025, 05:31:33 AM]


Recruiting as of 7/15/25 by MuMark
[July 15, 2025, 07:59:53 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


GGGG

Quote from: PBRme on January 28, 2010, 02:04:40 PM
All of this ignores the critical point that educational spending is increasing at a rate 1-2% higher than the rate of inflation.  While state direct funding is now "ONLY" about $1 Billion annually if increases had been more in line with inflation the states share would have remained stable.

The technology and energy explanation is spurious at best.  Even with energy costs doubling I doubt they are even 5-7% of total costs. 


You would have to really dig into the numbers to get the whole picture.  Some of the increases are due to dedicated funding sources...Professor Smith gets a research grant to fund his research.  However, salary compression is a big issue that a lot of small public schools face...Professor Anderson was hired in 1975 to teach accounting.  He got his nice 3-4% annual adjustments in salary, but now he's retiring and his replacement will cost $15,000 more.

Previous topic - Next topic