Main Menu
collapse

Resources

Recent Posts

OT MU adds swimming program by swoopem
[Today at 03:53:47 PM]


2025-26 Schedule by dgies9156
[Today at 03:17:48 PM]


Ethan Johnston to Marquette by Nukem2
[Today at 03:06:39 PM]


Recruiting as of 4/15/25 by onepost
[Today at 02:05:16 PM]


APR Updates by Jay Bee
[Today at 01:28:00 PM]


NM by TSmith34, Inc.
[Today at 11:57:31 AM]


OT congrats to MU golf team. by mix it up
[Today at 08:02:40 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!


Jockey

Quote from: Uncle Rico on February 12, 2023, 08:29:10 PM
Another nail in the coffin of the woke mob NFL

Marge McSkanky is pissed.

Jockey

Quote from: The Sultan of Semantics on February 13, 2023, 08:15:41 AM
If you don't want a penalty to determine the outcome of a game, then don't commit the penalty.

And I would suggest it is completely unknown if it determined the outcome. The Eagles still would have had to at least get into FG range.

Exactly. We don't know if it would have decided the result. It simply would have given the Eagles a chance.

I hated the call, but the simple solution is don't hold.

Herman Cain

The Big Blunder for the Eagles was the fumble return for a touchdown. When teams are evenly matched , plays like that are usually hard to over come .

Mahomes will make a team pay every time they make a mistake like that .
"It was a Great Day until it wasn't"
    ——Rory McIlroy on Final Round at Pinehurst

muwarrior69

Quote from: MUBurrow on February 12, 2023, 10:42:49 PM
Yup. Philly's defense was the most disappointing unit in the game by a large margin.

What defense? 73 points scored in that game.

pbiflyer

Quote from: Jockey on February 13, 2023, 09:11:06 AM
Exactly. We don't know if it would have decided the result. It simply would have given the Eagles a chance.

I hated the call, but the simple solution is don't hold.

I bet you could look at that play and find a textbook example of holding on the O line comparable with the defensive hold they called.
It was a bush league call.

Pakuni

Quote from: pbiflyer on February 13, 2023, 09:25:00 AM
I bet you could look at that play and find a textbook example of holding on the O line comparable with the defensive hold they called.
It was a bush league call.

That may not be holding, actually.
See: Rule 12, Section 1, Article 3, Note 1.i.

Anyhow, the one guy who would have the most legit beef about the call if it were wrong has said it was not wrong.

MUBurrow

For what its worth, I think defensive holding could be called every play, but that specific type of defensive holding gets called every time.  That inside-out route, completely iso in man coverage is an extremely visible, dynamic route.  Plus the release out and up will expose any kind of jersey tug and make it look even worse than it is.  Its not like using an arm to slow a guy down on post 15 yards down the field or something.  I felt a little let down to not get to see the Eagles get the ball back, but its a great play design that kind of intentionally puts the ref in a tough position.

Previous topic - Next topic