collapse

Resources

Stud of Georgetown Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: @ Creighton

Marquette
69
Marquette @
Creighton
Date/Time: Dec 20, 2025, 7:30pm
TV: NBCSN
Schedule for 2025-26
Georgetown
78

Cheeks

Quote from: Fluffy Blue Monster on December 19, 2019, 09:00:14 AM

Cheeks gets his butt handed to him so he goes political.  As old as time...

Fluffy wrong again, playing cards he doesn't own but plays them on behalf of others...as old as time....

Factual question...more people leaving or coming into California?  Looks like high school football players doing the same.  Good for them, a lot more to life than Cal...explore, open up your horizons...I encourage my kids to do it and think many people should leave the comforts of home to see what else is out there.
"I hate everything about this job except the games, Everything. I don't even get affected anymore by the winning, by the ratings, those things. The trouble is, it will sound like an excuse because we've never won the national championship, but winning just isn't all that important to me." Al McGuire

Cheeks

Quote from: Uncle Rico on December 19, 2019, 09:05:57 AM
Bad coaches have good recruiting classes.  Brady Hoke had plenty.  That's not hard to comprehend.

The USC recruiting classes from 2010-13, when crippled by sanctions, were 3, 8, 8 and 13.

So, what you're telling me is, sanctions didn't cripple USC football, the media did.  That's a different topic.

Uhm, no.  What you FAIL to recognize is the scholarship reductions during those years meant lack of quality depth...bodies.  If a school has 25 scholarships, but USC can only bring in 12....even if those 12 are decently rated they are falling behind because of lack of depth and quantity.  You do realize the massive reduction of scholarships....aka...quantity...during that time?  Yes?

And yes, even bad coaches have good recruiting classes, but you bury your head in the sand to pretend his lame duck status isn't a huge contributor to this. 
"I hate everything about this job except the games, Everything. I don't even get affected anymore by the winning, by the ratings, those things. The trouble is, it will sound like an excuse because we've never won the national championship, but winning just isn't all that important to me." Al McGuire

Uncle Rico

Quote from: Cheeks on December 19, 2019, 09:10:46 AM
Uhm, no.  What you FAIL to recognize is the scholarship reductions during those years meant lack of quality depth...bodies.  If a school has 25 scholarships, but USC can only bring in 12....even if those 12 are decently rated they are falling behind because of lack of depth and quantity.  You do realize the massive reduction of scholarships....aka...quantity...during that time?  Yes?

And yes, even bad coaches have good recruiting classes, but you bury your head in the sand to pretend his lame duck status isn't a huge contributor to this.

His lame duck status is because he's a bad coach.  No one is burying their head in the sand.  USC has failed to hire good coaches and that's why they fail, not sanctions. 
The Google old days

brewcity77

Quote from: Cheeks on December 18, 2019, 11:38:13 PM
I said I was wrong....what grain of sand is rubbing you wrong this time?

You very specifically said "if I was wrong I was wrong." Lots of ifs and no actual admission.

Ardmore Mug


TSmith34, Inc.

If you think for one second that I am comparing the USA to China you have bumped your hard.

rocky_warrior


Previous topic - Next topic