collapse

Resources

Stud of Georgetown Game

Nigel James Jr.

20 points, 6 rebounds,
6 assists, 3 steals,
36 minutes

2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross5
James Jr4
Parham1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

The CB Crown Tournament - 2026 by rocky_warrior
[Today at 03:16:58 PM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by MuggsyB
[Today at 03:02:35 PM]


What has changed with Marquette and is it sustainable? by Pakuni
[Today at 02:00:20 PM]


Recruiting as of 1/15/26 by Viper
[Today at 01:34:14 PM]


2025-26 College Hoops Thread by IrwinFletcher
[Today at 08:58:39 AM]


When was the last time.... by Billy Hoyle
[February 27, 2026, 09:41:47 PM]


2025-26 Big East Conference TV Schedule by Mr. Nielsen
[February 27, 2026, 04:14:53 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up:  DePaul

Marquette
76
Marquette vs
DePaul
Date/Time: Mar 1, 2026, 3:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Georgetown
60

GGGG

Was at Creighton this weekend.  Apparently going to visit us and UTEP.

2013 PG from Clovis, NM...a late bloomer from an area that doesn't produce many D1 players.

Earl Tatum


brewcity77

Solid contingency option. Would prefer Patterson, but not a bad backup to the guys we haven't landed.

GGGG

Quote from: Earl Tatum on September 25, 2012, 09:30:05 AM
Don't want him, ain't that good

Seriously, could you tone it down a bit?  If Buzz wants him, who are we to argue?  I don't mind constructive criticism...and how do you know he "ain't that good?"


bilsu

Quote from: brewcity77 on September 25, 2012, 09:49:29 AM
Solid contingency option. Would prefer Patterson, but not a bad backup to the guys we haven't landed.
Why? Paterson is not a top 100 player and may have academic issues. Even if he does not, we look bad by taking a player that supposedly could not get into Indiana.

Spotcheck Billy

Quote from: bilsu on September 26, 2012, 04:08:50 PM
Why? Paterson is not a top 100 player and may have academic issues. Even if he does not, we look bad by taking a player that supposedly could not get into Indiana.

no Crean castoffs!

brewcity77

Quote from: bilsu on September 26, 2012, 04:08:50 PM
Why? Paterson is not a top 100 player and may have academic issues. Even if he does not, we look bad by taking a player that supposedly could not get into Indiana.

Been following his recruitment longer and feel he's more of a sure bet. Really like his defense, which is important for incoming freshmen. Not sure how taking a player that couldn't get into IU makes us look bad other than in the eyes of Crean-bashers; it was a pretty clear case of TC having one too many guys on scholarship and Patterson being the lowest rated incoming recruit.

I am glad we landed Dawson. Liking Patterson is not an indictment.

Previous topic - Next topic