Quote from: Hards Alumni on March 02, 2026, 08:52:45 PM
Sturgill Simpson's project. It is fantastic.
Quote from: The Sultan on Today at 02:30:19 PMAnd as I posted earlier, I think you are wrong. This is just about dumb people making dumb decisions.
Quote from: panda on Today at 04:47:04 PMWhatever happens happens. I'm along for the ride. Make up make out is the best kind of make outHey - I thought you guys would just hug it out! Find some common ground😀Everyone is on edge when you have a season like we did...
Quote from: brewcity77 on Today at 06:40:44 AMIf this is was a blip, then yes. If they rebuild through the portal, reinforcing the core 3, and are back in single digit seed, fighting for protected seed territory next year, then yes. However that is clearly not a given and this season has shown that Shaka no longer gets the benefit of the doubt.
If we're 25-10 (14-6) after finishing top-3 in the league and playing on Saturday in the BET at this time next year, great. But if we're 17-16 (7-13) and dropped our first BET game while never seriously getting close to the bubble, then Shaka will be gone and deservedly so.
If he backs up the worst season in many of our living memories with success, he'll be back. But if he follows it up with more failure, he'll be gone. And it's absolutely crazy that you of all people don't see that clear as day.
Quote from: MuggsyB on March 08, 2026, 04:42:33 PMWho are your mid-major sleepers for the tournament? I think we could see a lot of chalk.
Quote from: MuggsyB on March 10, 2026, 09:50:22 AMI know Gonzaga & SMC are called "mid-majors" but they're clearly not. Let's assume SCU is in, regardless of today's result. Let's even assume Miami is in if they don't win their tournament. Who are the other non-autobid mid majors that will make the NCAA tournament?
Quote from: Jay Bee on Today at 08:44:04 AMbro, pass it
Quote from: BM1090 on Today at 11:20:41 AMI don't disagree with this, but I do think it's interesting that we had a lot of people comparing Wojo's trajectory with Jay Wright, insisting it takes time to build a program. I was actually onboard with some of these arguments even though it never materialized.
Shaka's first five years here mirror Nova from 06-12, minus the one final four. 13-19 season with a young but talented core in 2012, improved to 20-14 the following year, then the elite run started after that.
If Shaka misses the tournament next year but it's a 19-13 kind of year and it's pretty clear we'll be better the following year, he should be retained. As long as we see a willingness to change his strategy from what got us to this year, there's no reason to move on. He's a good coach that's brought us to regular season heights that I hadn't seen in my lifetime.
Quote from: GoFastAndWin on Today at 04:42:47 PMTalked to an Aztec fan the other day. He thinks Miles Byrd did little to improve his draft stock this season and due to kind of losing that opportunity, he will look to transfer to another program which plays a disruptive defensive scheme and lots of transition scoring. He does have a propensity to over-gamble for steals, but so did Chase, and MB is an upgrade based on frame. Ironically, like Chase, he also failed to convert this year on some crunch time buckets. He's 6'6" with a 7' wingspan and it sure would be nice having him and DO creating upheaval out there in the passing lanes with the improving on-ball D from Adrian and Nigel. Get him and a solid rim protector in the portal and we're back. Add a decent backup PG to that mix and the sky is the limit.
Quote from: Jay Bee on Today at 05:49:10 PMThis is quickly turning into a Dayton chat board...er, transitioning to
Page created in 0.092 seconds with 18 queries.