I'm actually surprised the Colts aren't bringing Tannenhill in for a visit.

Quote from: TSmith34, Inc. on December 08, 2025, 10:01:25 AMWeird to think Muggsy overreacted. Not like him, usually.

We all know he's prone to reaching

Sticking with my original prediction of 0-31.

Quote from: WhiteTrash on December 07, 2025, 05:49:31 PMIn the past 35 years has MU ever failed to make the tough or expensive decisions to support the team?

not that I'm aware of. Hopefully this trend continues.

Not sure how to grade this team. Maryland should have been a W. Oklahoma too. Wisconsin isn't an asss kicking if we hit some shots. I mean, could you shoot any worse?? Thus, 7 wins right now isn't far fetched. Alas, as a team we are a C-/D+ Individually, Chase is a B (Wisconsin game not withstanding). James a B-. Rest of team C- or worse. Coaching, D. Apparently Shaka flunked classes on talent assessment, although I do like Stevens and Phillips, and what I'm hearing about the RS's and incoming. Let's hope Shaka passed the TJ Otzelberger class on roster development, and '26/27 will be better.

Quote from: WhiteTrash on December 08, 2025, 06:56:51 PMAfter reviewing the rules, I give this post a 1 out of 10.

Unfortunately this is how many of his children Rivers can afford to put through university

Quote from: GB Warrior on December 08, 2025, 06:35:17 PMChildcare has become unaffordable in Trumps economy

After reviewing the rules, I give this post a 1 out of 10. 

All stats have flaws, especially defensive stats, but just for fun I added points plus rebounds, plus assists, plus steals, plus blocked shots, minus turnovers, took the total and divided it by minutes played to see how current players would rank:

1. Ross .851, 2. James .780, 3. Lowery .744, 4. Clark .733, 5. Parham .647, 6. Gold .639, 7. Norman .630, 8. Stevens .534, 9. Hamilton .497, 10. Jones .437, 11. Phillips .407, 12. Owens .406.

I suspect Stevens with extended playing time will soar in this and Jones will move up too, I would guess. Surprised Lowery scored so well compared to others. Recency bias on my part. Has not played well of late, obviously.

Phillips is supposed to be in high school and appears nervous, which is understandable. Still think he'll be a good player. Nice shot, might not be done growing. Maybe a future stretch 4?

Not surprised Clark scored well here. Sure most of his minutes come at the end of games already decided, but he's looked good and I don't understand why everyone lumps him and Hamilton together. Clark is 7-1 with a massive wingspan and is only his second year of benefiting from college coaching/weight room/going against college competition in practice every day. Hamilton is 6-9 and in his third year.

Was shocked to see someone, sorry I forgot who posted it, give Ross a low grade. I'd give him a B+. Carrying such a big load it's not reasonable to expect him to be AS crazy good a defender as he was in past years.

Quote from: WhiteTrash on December 08, 2025, 03:00:00 PM92 - 94 is still an A right?

AB?