Quote from: 21Jumpstreet on Today at 06:04:16 PMI definitely don't see this is a positive, but time to move on and focus on who is here.Does this even rate in the top 10 of MU's negatives this year?
Quote from: wadesworld on Today at 05:56:57 PMShaka was not going to tell the media Zaide was being kicked off the team prior to the official release of him. And they probably weren't going to do that until the end of the semester.
Quote from: MU82 on Today at 06:01:32 PMHe didn't have to. As I said a few mins ago, if Shaka knew when asked, rather than a quick and authoritative "No," he should have briefly responded with coachspeak. He and coaches everywhere do it all the time. Lying was unnecessary.
Quote from: CountryRoads on Today at 06:02:30 PMWasn't Cody Hatt the one that pushed Shaka to take Kolek when Shaka said he wasn't a fit? Was he also the one that wasn't sold on Zaide when Shaka wanted him as a top priority?
Quote from: MU82 on Today at 05:50:05 PMA shame.
I wasn't as high on Lowery as some others here, but I still thought he would be a solid contributor to a team that would at least be on the bubble this season. But like other MU players, he not only didn't improve, he actually regressed.
Aside from Al slapping Bo Ellis, it's generally not good to see players and coaches getting into major conflicts - certainly a conflict so bad that it necessitates severe discipline, let alone the nuclear option of dismissal. It's a sign that the harmony and chemistry that marked all of Shaka's earlier teams at MU has eroded; losing tends to do that.
On a related note: I won't say Shaka outright lied when he was asked point-blank if Lowery was going to be dismissed and he immediately responded, "No." Maybe he didn't know for sure then. If he did, however, the proper response would have been, "All I'll keep saying regarding Zaide is there are personal reasons he's not with the team now."
Page created in 0.106 seconds with 18 queries.