2026-2027... would be a better title. 

3 out.

I'd guess 3 in.

Should? 3.
Reality? 2.

Seems to be a topic of the moment... I'll go with 3.

Quote from: MUbiz on Today at 11:12:43 AMThat is a very gray area that the NCAA won't even touch to my knowledge, so I will not pretend I know the answer to that.

My guess is the answer depends on what side the coach is on.

Quote from: Tha Hound on Today at 10:07:25 AMI'll keep hammering this drum - the bolded is not enough. A beast center for sure, I agree. But we also need a beast wing. And from there a quality depth piece or two would be nice.

Tough to see us shelling out the kind of cash that would take but in my opinion that's the bare minimum to be in legit contention next year.

What happens in the off season will tells us a lot about how much cash we actually have to spend and where it will be spent.

Quote from: muwarrior69 on February 19, 2026, 12:26:11 PMI don't know. Do we have the funds. After all the priority is retention.

You don't know lots of things.

Quote from: GoldenEagles03 on Today at 10:00:25 AMScrolling through Twitter and came across this tweet from Braziller from about 2 weeks ago. No mention of Nigel for the Freshman of the Year, just Mullins and Lewis. Lol.

Do coaches vote for that, or is it media?

https://x.com/i/status/2020213602242695323

Head Coaches vote

Quote from: The Sultan on Today at 10:06:32 AMAre scouts from one program talking with a player's agent "tampering?"

That is a very gray area that the NCAA won't even touch to my knowledge, so I will not pretend I know the answer to that.

Quote from: Hards Alumni on Today at 09:26:26 AMOne no name dildo finds out about Nigel, and it is an indictment of how bad we are?

Lol exactly.  Just more great stuff from Greg Gard's and Karter Knox's biggest fan.