Quote from: TallTitan34 on Today at 11:34:21 AMhttps://x.com/bulwarkonline/status/2010361533910393300?s=46

Quote from: Zog from Margo on Today at 12:03:18 PMI don't see this at all. Shaka was willing to stick with his recruits to the point of risking a very poor season. How does that place Shaka at a disadvantage when recruiting against a coach who doesn't have a similar commitment and who must acknowledge he will portal over a frosh recruit rather than take any risk on development? No matter what Shaka does going forward with respect to the portal, he's already demonstrated a greater commitment to development than almost any other D-1 coach. And after 4 years of this- not one-what does he have to show for it?
[/i]
Quote from: TSmith34, Inc. on Today at 11:49:51 AMOh, I agree. A slim plurality voted for fascism. 30% because they are excited for it.You seem like a passionate individual.
Quote from: wadesworld on Today at 11:56:53 AMI'd take Luke Fickell over MLF at this point. Give me Harbaugh. McDaniels. Don't really care. Some nerd came in and started calling out MLF, and MLF just shriveled up and took the beating.Matt LaFleur is a guy who cares about how his hair looks on the sideline and how Ben Johnson touches his back. In the words of Logan Roy, he is not a serious coach.
Quote from: Billy Hoyle on Today at 11:42:49 AMfair enough, maybe I'm overestimating Parham's development and skills as well as his hustle (he was really the only one who seemed to be going 100% at the Purdue game) . I like his hustle, and I think with his physique and upper body strength, he can be a double-figure scorer in the post who can draw defenders out thanks to his ability to shoot (thinking a 14 and 7 kind of guy).
BTW, this is based on Shaka continuing his strict RVG.
Page created in 0.110 seconds with 18 queries.