MU desperately needs that "impact hire" more than ever now.
They're two completely unrelated issues.
The Badgers will be a good team next year regardless of what happens with Marquette. They're not contigent on each other at all.
MU was an E8 team last year and was supposed to be better this year. How did that work out?
Should start out next year ranked #1....#2 at worst.
Quote from: Heisenberg on March 29, 2014, 10:31:36 PM
MU was an E8 team last year and was supposed to be better this year. How did that work out?
Why don't you post another new topic to find out?
Quote from: mattyv1908 on March 29, 2014, 10:30:13 PM
They're two completely unrelated issues.
The Badgers will be a good team next year regardless of what happens with Marquette. They're not contigent on each other at all.
recruiting wise it means a ton.
I think its pretty safe to say after the last 5 months that if Diamond stays in the state it will be to play for the Badgers. A lack of a coaching change hangover is extremely important to the future of the program. A bad hire coupled with UW success could lead to a major lack of in-state talent coming to MU for years to come.
Quote from: BenCat12 on March 29, 2014, 10:34:11 PM
recruiting wise it means a ton.
I think its pretty safe to say after the last 5 months that if Diamond stays in the state it will be to play for the Badgers. A lack of a coaching change hangover is extremely important to the future of the program. A bad hire coupled with UW success could lead to a major lack of in-state talent coming to MU for years to come.
Yep. Good thing we're hitting a home run with our coaching search.
Quote from: BenCat12 on March 29, 2014, 10:34:11 PM
recruiting wise it means a ton.
I think its pretty safe to say after the last 5 months that if Diamond stays in the state it will be to play for the Badgers. A lack of a coaching change hangover is extremely important to the future of the program. A bad hire coupled with UW success could lead to a major lack of in-state talent coming to MU for years to come.
They play two completely different styles and recruit completely different players for the most part.
It hasn't stopped either program from being successful the last several seasons. You may be right but I think it's of minimal effect.
Quote from: BenCat12 on March 29, 2014, 10:34:11 PM
recruiting wise it means a ton.
I think its pretty safe to say after the last 5 months that if Diamond stays in the state it will be to play for the Badgers. A lack of a coaching change hangover is extremely important to the future of the program. A bad hire coupled with UW success could lead to a major lack of in-state talent coming to MU for years to come.
Maybe, but it depends on who we hire. MU and UW haven't really been after the same recruits all that much. I'm pretty sure that UW wasn't even an option for Duane Wilson or Deonte Burton.
Quote from: mattyv1908 on March 29, 2014, 10:38:29 PM
They play two completely different styles and recruit completely different players for the most part.
It hasn't stopped either program from being successful the last several seasons. You may be right but I think it's of minimal effect.
I respect your posts on here, but I think you are wrong. They recruit similar players now and the Badgers are becoming more physically talented (Decker, Hayes, Koenig). They aren't getting the plaid wearing lumberjacks they used to.
BTW, what style do we play?
Wisco has a couple of players stashed for next year. One Riley Dearing from Minn. No room for him play this
year. Reason for redshirt. Jordan Hill PG.
Quote from: mattyv1908 on March 29, 2014, 10:38:29 PM
They play two completely different styles and recruit completely different players for the most part.
It hasn't stopped either program from being successful the last several seasons. You may be right but I think it's of minimal effect.
+1
It's as much how they play in addition to how they do.
Stone is a back to the basket 5. How does that style fit with Bucky's style.
Frankly if Stone is willing to travel away from home (meaning not MU), it would make more sense for him to entertain Kentucky, Duke or Michigan State as there styles fit his game.
Frankly Luke Fisher's game probably works better at Bucky than Stone.
Quote from: BenCat12 on March 29, 2014, 10:41:37 PM
I respect your posts on here, but I think you are wrong. They recruit similar players now and the Badgers are becoming more physically talented (Decker, Hayes, Koenig). They aren't getting the plaid wearing lumberjacks they used to.
BTW, what style do we play?
What players do they have that we recruited? I'm pretty sure we weren't after the three you listed. Likewise, they weren't going after Wilson, Burton, JJJ, or Dawson.
You think we are wrong but provide zero evidence.
Quote from: MUSF on March 29, 2014, 10:39:17 PM
Maybe, but it depends on who we hire. MU and UW haven't really been after the same recruits all that much. I'm pretty sure that UW wasn't even an option for Duane Wilson or Deonte Burton.
UW is quickly becoming a "cool" team now and getting raves from guys like Barkley. I just don't think MU can afford a mediocre hire.
Quote from: BenCat12 on March 29, 2014, 10:41:37 PM
I respect your posts on here, but I think you are wrong. They recruit similar players now and the Badgers are becoming more physically talented (Decker, Hayes, Koenig). They aren't getting the plaid wearing lumberjacks they used to.
BTW, what style do we play?
Well this last season we played the most pathetic half court offense signified by the incessant dribbling around the top of the key by our point guard but the last several seasons we've been a very good transition team with the ability to create shots with dribble drive penetration.
We can agree to disagree on your overall point. I'm not saying it will have zero impact, but I think it will be minimal.
Quote from: mechaghidorah on March 29, 2014, 10:45:07 PM
UW is quickly becoming a "cool" team now and getting raves from guys like Barkley. I just don't think MU can afford a mediocre hire.
Well that changes everything. Barkley raves about the team that just won on his network. gamechanger!!
UW NEVER has guys leave early. Who was the last guy that left before 4 years? Devin Harris? Any other program would lose Kominsky after a NCAA like this, but not Bo. God's sake Tucker stayed for like 7 years. We get guys like Otule to stay while Vander leaves early. Must be the way Bo indoctrinates them.
I guess who said life would be fair.
Well congratulations anyway.
Quote from: BenCat12 on March 29, 2014, 10:41:37 PM
I respect your posts on here, but I think you are wrong. They recruit similar players now and the Badgers are becoming more physically talented (Decker, Hayes, Koenig). They aren't getting the plaid wearing lumberjacks they used to.
BTW, what style do we play?
We're going to find out next week. Hopefully Monday or Tuesday.
Quote from: Heisenberg on March 29, 2014, 10:48:00 PM
Well that changes everything. Barkley raves about the team that just won on his network. gamechanger!!
We may not agree on much, but I think there's a little overreaction going on by scoopers about this topic.
Was Wisconsin worried about us recruiting they're type of players during our last three years of success?
Quote from: MUSF on March 29, 2014, 10:44:18 PM
What players do they have that we recruited? I'm pretty sure we weren't after the three you listed. Likewise, they weren't going after Wilson, Burton, JJJ, or Dawson.
You think we are wrong but provide zero evidence.
There is no evidence, we have no coach, that's why I said, IF they continue down the paths they are on, not staying relatively equal like they have been in years past. If we continue to be the train wreck and UW continues to dominate, style wont matter. Diamond doesn't want to be just a back to the basket center, he wants to shoot threes.
Again, what style do we play, we have no coach. If we hire Howland we will play slower than UW did this year, than what?
Kaminsky is having a much better NCAA tournament than Blue did and I bet he does not go pro.
Quote from: BenCat12 on March 29, 2014, 10:49:46 PM
There is no evidence, we have no coach, that's why I said, IF they continue down the paths they are on, not staying relatively equal like they have been in years past. If we continue to be the train wreck and UW continues to dominate, style wont matter. Diamond doesn't want to be just a back to the basket center, he wants to shoot threes.
Again, what style do we play, we have no coach. If we hire Howland we will play slower than UW did this year, than what?
Howland's pace of play his last five years at UCLA is identical to the pace of play of Marquette the last five years. That's a misconception.
Quote from: mattyv1908 on March 29, 2014, 10:51:53 PM
Howland's pace of play his last five years at UCLA is identical to the pace of play of Marquette the last five years. That's a misconception.
Not sure how many times this needs to be said, but keep posting it.
Quote from: mechaghidorah on March 29, 2014, 10:45:07 PM
UW is quickly becoming a "cool" team now and getting raves from guys like Barkley. I just don't think MU can afford a mediocre hire.
There is no sane human being alive who thinks Marquette can afford a mediocre hire.
Is it insane to think if Marquette doesn't like their choices this year, Wainright becomes "Interim Head Coach" for a year?
Quote from: mattyv1908 on March 29, 2014, 10:51:53 PM
Howland's pace of play his last five years at UCLA is identical to the pace of play of Marquette the last five years. That's a misconception.
There is also a misconception that we play fast.
The fact is nobody knows what style we will play in the future. Nobody knows who we will hire. UW is a juggernaut right now and most likely will be next year and we are a disaster.
That will only hurt in-state recruiting. To say it won't, is being dishonest.
Quote from: Avenue Commons on March 29, 2014, 10:54:57 PM
There is no sane human being alive who thinks Marquette can afford a mediocre hire.
Is it insane to think if Marquette doesn't like their choices this year, Wainright becomes "Interim Head Coach" for a year?
WEEKEND AT JERRY'S!!
Quote from: BenCat12 on March 29, 2014, 10:49:46 PM
There is no evidence, we have no coach, that's why I said, IF they continue down the paths they are on, not staying relatively equal like they have been in years past. If we continue to be the train wreck and UW continues to dominate, style wont matter. Diamond doesn't want to be just a back to the basket center, he wants to shoot threes.
Again, what style do we play, we have no coach. If we hire Howland we will play slower than UW did this year, than what?
He can't. His range is out to 15 feet max.
Stop making stuff up.
If you want to sound smart try this ... Ellerson is more likely to lean Bucky because of what they did tonight than Stone. 6'10" traditional with NBA three range. That has Bucky written all over it.
Mike Hall @BTNMikeHall 4m
Frank Kaminsky had a grand total of 133 points last year. He has 74 points in this NCAA Tournament after four games!
Quote from: Heisenberg on March 29, 2014, 10:56:52 PM
He can't. His range is out to 15 feet max.
Stop making stuff up.
If you want to sound smart try this ... Ellerson is more likely to lean Bucky because of what they did tonight than Stone. 6'10" traditional with NBA three range. That has Bucky written all over it.
Go start another thread. I've seen him shoot 3's in games. What big man in the country wouldn't want to go to UW and replace Kaminsky after the game he had tonight and the season he's had. Big men want to play like guards, they always have.
Quote from: Heisenberg on March 29, 2014, 10:56:52 PM
He can't. His range is out to 15 feet max.
Stop making stuff up.
If you want to sound smart try this ... Ellerson is more likely to lean Bucky because of what they did tonight than Stone. 6'10" traditional with NBA three range. That has Bucky written all over it.
If I needed advice from someone like you on how to be smart I wouldn't be able to type a response, my computer would be ruined from all the drool. Hurry! Start another pointless thread, it has been at least 5 minutes!
Quote from: mechaghidorah on March 29, 2014, 10:56:57 PM
Mike Hall @BTNMikeHall 4m
Frank Kaminsky had a grand total of 133 points last year. He has 74 points in this NCAA Tournament after four games!
This is the big difference between Kaminsky and Vander ... Vander started school with the intention of leaving early for the association.
Kaminsky started school with the intention of getting his degree, then maybe playing/traveling a year in Europe and settling into a real job somewhere in the Chicago area (his hometown). Then in the last few months, and especially the last few games, he has been playing out of his mind. He averaged 7 minutes/game his Freshman year, about what Dawson averaged for us. Is Dawson leaving early?
I'll bet no one before tonight even considered Kaminsky leaving for the association early as a remote possibility. Vander was planning his exit for years.
Quote from: BenCat12 on March 29, 2014, 10:55:34 PM
There is also a misconception that we play fast.
The fact is nobody knows what style we will play in the future. Nobody knows who we will hire. UW is a juggernaut right now and most likely will be next year and we are a disaster.
That will only hurt in-state recruiting. To say it won't, is being dishonest.
For someone who I almost would guarantee would agree with me on most issues, I think there's a tad bit of hyperbole going on right now.
Wisconsin is no different than they have been the past decade. They play solid team basketball for the entire shot clock, they rely on good outside shooting and they play fundamental defense. Because of this style, their margin for error is razor thin.
Marquette has not shot the ball well for some time but have consistently forced turnovers and have been able to create off the dribble and usually have out worked their opponents. Because of their style thei margin for error is razor thin.
Neither this year's Badger team or last year's Marquette team were close to being a juggernaut.
Let's be honest, we all thought Vander was going to be good enough to leave early as well. But I get your point.
Quote from: mattyv1908 on March 29, 2014, 11:05:32 PM
For someone who I almost would guarantee would agree with me on most issues, I think there's a tad bit of hyperbole going on right now.
Wisconsin is no different than they have been the past decade. They play solid team basketball for the entire shot clock, they rely on good outside shooting and they play fundamental defense. Because of this style, their margin for error is razor thin.
Marquette has not shot the ball well for some time but have consistently forced turnovers and have been able to create off the dribble and usually have out worked their opponents. Because of their style thei margin for error is razor thin.
Neither this year's Badger team or last year's Marquette team were close to being a juggernaut.
MU got to the elite eight and absolutely crapped the bed. UW gets to the elite eight and plays with incredible heart. Why? Coaching?
Quote from: mechaghidorah on March 29, 2014, 11:09:06 PM
MU got to the elite eight and absolutely crapped the bed. UW gets to the elite eight and plays with incredible heart. Why? Coaching?
Ultimately MU had their achilles heel weakness exposed last year - poor shooting. Can't win a game when you shoot under 30%.
Quote from: mattyv1908 on March 29, 2014, 11:05:32 PM
For someone who I almost would guarantee would agree with me on most issues, I think there's a tad bit of hyperbole going on right now.
Wisconsin is no different than they have been the past decade. They play solid team basketball for the entire shot clock, they rely on good outside shooting and they play fundamental defense. Because of this style, their margin for error is razor thin.
Marquette has not shot the ball well for some time but have consistently forced turnovers and have been able to create off the dribble and usually have out worked their opponents. Because of their style thei margin for error is razor thin.
Neither this year's Badger team or last year's Marquette team were close to being a juggernaut.
I agree with what you are saying if we were talking about 2-3 years ago, but I think we just disagree on the caliber of player Bo has been able to get recently. The talent of their roster has improved quite a bit over the last two seasons. Decker and Hayes are tremendous and underclassman, Koenig is gaining valuable experience, and Kaminsky is only a junior. They have a legitimate shot of winning the whole thing this year and next year. I don't know of another program you can say that about right now. I suppose the 6 that are left? They are trending upward and we are trending downward, that is my only point. We could make a tremendous hire (though I doubt it) and not have to deal with a coaching change hangover. Hopefully that happens, otherwise I could see things going very poorly for several years.
Quote from: PTM on March 29, 2014, 11:06:38 PM
Let's be honest, we all thought Vander was going to be good enough to leave early as well. But I get your point.
We ALL did? Seriously? Vander was a train wreck his first two seasons at MU...
Quote from: BenCat12 on March 29, 2014, 11:02:46 PM
If I needed advice from someone like you on how to be smart I wouldn't be able to type a response, my computer would be ruined from all the drool. Hurry! Start another pointless thread, it has been at least 5 minutes!
Stone was 1 for 3 in 3 pointers in an entire season. So remind us all again why watching every guy on Bucky's team launch 3 pointers makes Stone think he's going to Bucky because that fits his style. Remind us why Bo would tolerate him launching threes after attempting three in one season?
He's a bull under the basket. No one on bucky plays like that. To compare Stone to Kaminsky is just announcing "I don't know what I'm talking about."
Henry Ellerson and Luke Fisher are the comparisons.
Quote from: mechaghidorah on March 29, 2014, 11:09:06 PM
MU got to the elite eight and absolutely crapped the bed. UW gets to the elite eight and plays with incredible heart. Why? Coaching?
Or Syracuse last year was a much better team that Zona this year.
Quote from: Heisenberg on March 29, 2014, 10:31:36 PM
MU was an E8 team last year and was supposed to be better this year. How did that work out?
But they have Bo..we had...Brent:/
Quote from: BenCat12 on March 29, 2014, 11:11:06 PM
I agree with what you are saying if we were talking about 2-3 years ago, but I think we just disagree on the caliber of player Bo has been able to get recently. The talent of their roster has improved quite a bit over the last two seasons. Decker and Hayes are tremendous and underclassman, Koenig is gaining valuable experience, and Kaminsky is only a junior. They have a legitimate shot of winning the whole thing this year and next year. I don't know of another program you can say that about right now. I suppose the 6 that are left? They are trending upward and we are trending downward, that is my only point. We could make a tremendous hire (though I doubt it) and not have to deal with a coaching change hangover. Hopefully that happens, otherwise I could see things going very poorly for several years.
Kentucky is a bad match up for them. I hate to say, but as of right now they(WI) would be my fav to win it all next year
Quote from: atk13thst on March 29, 2014, 11:21:26 PM
Kentucky is a bad match up for them. I hate to say, but as of right now they would be my fav to win it all next year
Who is going to be on their team next year? The two Harrisons, Randle and Poytress are alll gone. Name their starting lineup net year before we crown them champions.
Quote from: Heisenberg on March 29, 2014, 11:23:40 PM
Who is going to be on their team next year? The two Harrisons, Randle and Poytress are alll gone. Name their starting lineup net year before we crown them champions.
Wisconsin bruh
Quote from: Ners on March 29, 2014, 11:11:34 PM
We ALL did? Seriously? Vander was a train wreck his first two seasons at MU...
Go back to when Vander committed...read the posts...
Congrats to Bucky but I think it all ends at this point for this year and next year will be a step backwards. Great game tonight, Bo can finally claim a final 4 after 13 years.
Quote from: Heisenberg on March 29, 2014, 11:15:07 PM
Stone was 1 for 3 in 3 pointers in an entire season. So remind us all again why watching every guy on Bucky's team launch 3 pointers makes Stone think he's going to Bucky because that fits his style. Remind us why Bo would tolerate him launching threes after attempting three in one season?
He's a bull under the basket. No one on bucky plays like that. To compare Stone to Kaminsky is just announcing "I don't know what I'm talking about."
Henry Ellerson and Luke Fisher are the comparisons.
That was his freshmen year genius, look it up. He is expanding his game, he wants to be a Kevin Love type player (perhaps the Howland hiring would be good in that sense). He also spends an awful lot of time visiting Wisconsin and tweeting things, for someone who isn't interested in Wisconsin and Bo is clearly interested in him. Is Bo going to change his style to fit Diamond, I think not. If Diamond goes to UW, they will work on his perimeter shot and he will shoot 3's just like every other big man they've had under Bo, not named Stiemsma. Ellerson and Fischer have nothing to do with this discussion.
Quote from: raul on March 29, 2014, 11:32:03 PM
Congrats to Bucky but I think it all ends at this point for this year and next year will be a step backwards. Great game tonight, Bo can finally claim a final 4 after 13 years.
They only lose Brust after this year
Quote from: BenCat12 on March 29, 2014, 11:11:06 PM
I agree with what you are saying if we were talking about 2-3 years ago, but I think we just disagree on the caliber of player Bo has been able to get recently. The talent of their roster has improved quite a bit over the last two seasons. Decker and Hayes are tremendous and underclassman, Koenig is gaining valuable experience, and Kaminsky is only a junior. They have a legitimate shot of winning the whole thing this year and next year. I don't know of another program you can say that about right now. I suppose the 6 that are left? They are trending upward and we are trending downward, that is my only point. We could make a tremendous hire (though I doubt it) and not have to deal with a coaching change hangover. Hopefully that happens, otherwise I could see things going very poorly for several years.
Wisconsin has been just as capable as going to the final four any of the last ten years and this year's team was just as vulnerable to getting knocked out the first weekend like many of their previous teams.
If their shots don't fall they're an average team. This year they haven't had a poor shooting game in the tournament thus far.
I don't think next year will be any different.
But I feel your missing a big point and thus moving the goal posts from the real issue. We shouldn't be competing with Wisconsin. We should be competing with Georgetown, Villanova and the rest of the top Big East schools.
Our main concern should be winning 12+ games in conference period. If Marquette does that they won't ever miss the NCAAT and the program will have no trouble recruiting at all.
Quote from: mattyv1908 on March 29, 2014, 11:38:00 PM
Wisconsin has been just as capable as going to the final four any of the last ten years and this year's team was just as vulnerable to getting knocked out the first weekend like many of their previous teams.
If their shots don't fall they're an average team. This year they haven't had a poor shooting game in the tournament thus far.
Not quite. Big difference for this team is everyone on the floor can score and hit shots from all 5 spots. That has not been the case consistently over the years. Not a coincidence they are finally going to FF, its a direct reflection of the talent on the floor. Maybe the best collection they have ever had.
Quote from: mattyv1908 on March 29, 2014, 11:38:00 PM
Wisconsin has been just as capable as going to the final four any of the last ten years and this year's team was just as vulnerable to getting knocked out the first weekend like many of their previous teams.
If their shots don't fall they're an average team. This year they haven't had a poor shooting game in the tournament thus far.
I don't think next year will be any different.
But I feel your missing a big point and thus moving the goal posts from the real issue. We shouldn't be competing with Wisconsin. We should be competing with Georgetown, Villanova and the rest of the top Big East schools.
Our main concern should be winning 12+ games in conference period. If Marquette does that they won't ever miss the NCAAT and the program will have no trouble recruiting at all.
I understand what you are saying about competing in the conference and making the NCAAT. But what good does it do to be the best in our conference, if we are the second best in the state? I realize this is all hypothetical. We could get a great coach, that keeps the program together as far as returning players and incoming recruits, and not have to re-build. I'm just saying if UW keeps improving the quality of their roster and we continue to be an unorganized, leaderless disaster, they could dominate the recruiting in this state for several years. I think we have to agree to disagree on the quality of their team this year and next.
Quote from: BenCat12 on March 29, 2014, 11:44:10 PM
I understand what you are saying about competing in the conference and making the NCAAT. But what good does it do to be the best in our conference, if we are the second best in the state? I realize this is all hypothetical. We could get a great coach, that keeps the program together as far as returning players and incoming recruits, and not have to re-build. I'm just saying if UW keeps improving the quality of their roster and we continue to be an unorganized, leaderless disaster, they could dominate the recruiting in this state for several years. I think we have to agree to disagree on the quality of their team this year and next.
Look, Wisconsin is a great program with what Ryan has created there, but Marquette has had better success 3 out of the last 4 seasons. Were they fretting Marquette's success in the NCAAT and afraid of the ramifications or did Bo Ryan keep building and recruiting for his program?
Do the schools in New York, Ohio, Michigan, Virginia, North Carolina, California, Indiana, Kansas, Texas and any other state where multiple schools have successful programs have trouble recruiting the kids they want and competing at the highest level? Has Michigan State's dominance prevented Michigan from rebuilding their program to elite status? Do Ohio St, Xavier, Cincinnati and a couple of other successful mid majors from Ohio have trouble being successful? Kentucky and Louisville have no problem competing at the elite level. Neither have Duke and UNC.
This year was a MAJOR underachievement for MU, but to suggest that it fundamentally alters the dynamics of Wisconsin college basketball is coming just short of fear mongering in my opinion.
While I think this coaching hire thus far has been handled poorly and I don't think the job is as attractive as many on this forum, I think it's a tad premature to jump to the conclusions that you are at this time.
F**k, as a die hard Cubs fan (my true sports love) I'm conditioned to overreact in a negative way regarding the teams I root for. You're causing me to act out of character with a more pragmatic view of the events transpiring. I'm not sure I like being in this position.
TAMU, can I get a little help here? ;)
Quote from: BenCat12 on March 29, 2014, 11:32:11 PM
That was his freshmen year genius, look it up. He is expanding his game, he wants to be a Kevin Love type player (perhaps the Howland hiring would be good in that sense). He also spends an awful lot of time visiting Wisconsin and tweeting things, for someone who isn't interested in Wisconsin and Bo is clearly interested in him. Is Bo going to change his style to fit Diamond, I think not. If Diamond goes to UW, they will work on his perimeter shot and he will shoot 3's just like every other big man they've had under Bo, not named Stiemsma. Ellerson and Fischer have nothing to do with this discussion.
Just stop with the making stuff up. Last summer when Stone played for USA basketball, when he played with equal talent to his ability, he started 5 games and had 50 field goal attempts. ZERO 3 point attempts
http://www.usab.com/bios/stone_diamond.html
He also said this about himself:
Would compare his game to: DeMarcus Cousins. This would be the same DeMarcus Cousins that has played in 283 NBA games and made NINE 3 Pointers in all these games (no doubt all when the shot clock was at 1 and he had no choice).
Same DeMarcus Cousins that played 38 games at Kentucky (1 and done) and was 1 for 6 in threes
http://statsheet.com/mcb/players/player/kentucky/demarcus-cousins
Izzo said college basketball fans are idiots because they cannot remember what happened 3weeks ago, let alone three years ago. Be more afraid if Kentucky wins today and Stone wants to go play DeMarcus Cousins College coach. This notion that Stone wants to stand behind the arch and catch and shoot threes just makes you look bad.
Quote from: mechaghidorah on March 29, 2014, 10:56:57 PM
Mike Hall @BTNMikeHall 4m
Frank Kaminsky had a grand total of 133 points last year. He has 74 points in this NCAA Tournament after four games!
Sorry, I could not resist. Derrick Wilson had 161 points this year.
Wisco loses Brust and Anderson.
Quote from: Heisenberg on March 29, 2014, 10:42:52 PM
Stone is a back to the basket 5. How does that style fit with Bucky's style.
You've clearly never seen him play. The kid can drain it from three and loves to get out on the perimeter and take the shot. Honestly, I think he might fit in Bo's system better, but of course we don't yet know what our system will be.
Quote from: bilsu on March 30, 2014, 07:16:57 AM
Sorry, I could not resist. Derrick Wilson had 161 points this year.
Im with you!
Quote from: ODMU238 on March 30, 2014, 08:13:12 AM
You've clearly never seen him play. The kid can drain it from three and loves to get out on the perimeter and take the shot. Honestly, I think he might fit in Bo's system better, but of course we don't yet know what our system will be.
http://www.wissports.net/roster_players/1308735