MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: JD on January 02, 2013, 12:35:49 PM

Title: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: JD on January 02, 2013, 12:35:49 PM
Guy played a hell of a game, was impressed with his offense he showed last night.

Do you think Autry would prefer to play Steve more, or did Buzz give Autry the "green light" prior to the game starting?  I never saw Buzz play Steve that much and yes i'm aware of the foul problems, but Steve seemed to be in there during key points of the game, i was pleasently surprised. 

Great job steve, hope to see more in the future.
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: mugrad2006 on January 02, 2013, 12:38:23 PM
Steve's been very impressive in my humble opinion.  Been a while since I felt like we had a frontcourt player that has played that well as a freshman.
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: dgies9156 on January 02, 2013, 12:42:13 PM
In keeping with the way Marquette does things, I am guessing that Taylor Jr., played more because he earned it in practice and because he was a contributory presence on the floor last night.

I don't think there's an iota's difference between Buzz and any of his assistants on this matter.

Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: Lennys Tap on January 02, 2013, 12:46:11 PM
Quote from: mugrad2006 on January 02, 2013, 12:38:23 PM
Steve's been very impressive in my humble opinion.  Been a while since I felt like we had a frontcourt player that has played that well as a freshman.

I like Steve too but it hasn't been that long - Ox wasn't bad as a frosh.
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: CAGASS24 on January 02, 2013, 12:46:32 PM
He's close, but I don't think he'll surpass Davante's line from his freshman year, and that was with some time missed with injury.

2010-11

MARQ


.576 (FG)

2.2 (REB)

4.6 (PTS)
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: TexMex on January 02, 2013, 12:46:47 PM
YES! I can't believe nobody else mentioned this (That I've seen). Steve had a great game. He was a spark coming off the bench. With his size and athleticism I'd be surprised if he doesn't continue to get more minutes.
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: Marqevans on January 02, 2013, 12:47:55 PM
He must be really uping the play of everyone in practice.
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: warriorchick on January 02, 2013, 12:53:05 PM
I know this is a little off topic, but does anyone know why the name on the back of his uni says "S. Taylor" when he is the only Taylor on the team?  Is it because of T.J.?
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: Groin_pull on January 02, 2013, 01:02:28 PM
I was thrilled when MU signed him, and nothing has happened to change my mind. He's a good one.
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: MerrittsMustache on January 02, 2013, 01:05:23 PM
Quote from: warriorchick on January 02, 2013, 12:53:05 PM
I know this is a little off topic, but does anyone know why the name on the back of his uni says "S. Taylor" when he is the only Taylor on the team?  Is it because of T.J.?

I've wondered that too. I assume that all of the jerseys were ready to go before T.J. bolted.

I never understood the first initial on the jersey anyway. Doesn't the number give away which player it is?
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: warriorchick on January 02, 2013, 01:12:39 PM
Quote from: MerrittsMustache on January 02, 2013, 01:05:23 PM

I never understood the first initial on the jersey anyway. Doesn't the number give away which player it is?


Not if you don't have easy access to the roster - such as if you are watching on TV.  It will be interesting to see exactly what they do next year when they will have 2 D. Wilsons on the team.
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: muwarrior69 on January 02, 2013, 01:27:14 PM
Quote from: warriorchick on January 02, 2013, 01:12:39 PM
Not if you don't have easy access to the roster - such as if you are watching on TV.  It will be interesting to see exactly what they do next year when they will have 2 D. Wilsons on the team.

Derrick W, Duane W.
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: KenoshaWarrior on January 02, 2013, 01:35:28 PM
Quote from: JDuquaine on January 02, 2013, 12:35:49 PM
Guy played a hell of a game, was impressed with his offense he showed last night.

Do you think Autry would prefer to play Steve more, or did Buzz give Autry the "green light" prior to the game starting?  I never saw Buzz play Steve that much and yes i'm aware of the foul problems, but Steve seemed to be in there during key points of the game, i was pleasently surprised. 

Great job steve, hope to see more in the future.
Beat me to it.  He played great and shows some great flashes of being
THE FUTURE!!
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: starting5 on January 02, 2013, 01:56:45 PM
He was also in at crunch time vs NCC Saturday. 

He has earned the minutes and it helped to motivate Jamil the final minutes of the game.  Before Jamil checked in the game for the final time Autry grabbed him and talked to him for a while.  That seemed to really light a spark under him.  Jamil came in and attacked the basket on a drive for the first time in a long time.
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: chapman on January 02, 2013, 02:10:33 PM
Was interesting that when Ellis asked Autry who his "key guy" was after the game with Cadougan being the obvious answer, he threw a Buzz-esque curveball and started raving about Taylor.  One things for sure, he can't be getting the "before a media timeout garbage minutes" he had been getting against quality competition or in close games (1 vs. USC, 3 vs. UW, 3 @ GB,  2 vs. LSU); he's too good for that.
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: Stretchdeltsig on January 02, 2013, 02:27:37 PM
Agree that Steve is the "real deal."  Very mature for a freshman, just like Mayo last year.  He plays "big.  Wonder why he was billed as 6'8" in high school and now he's listed at 6'7"?  In the huddle he looks as tall as Gardner.
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: MU Fan in Connecticut on January 02, 2013, 02:33:12 PM
Quote from: chapman on January 02, 2013, 02:10:33 PM
Was interesting that when Ellis asked Autry who his "key guy" was after the game with Cadougan being the obvious answer, he threw a Buzz-esque curveball and started raving about Taylor.  One things for sure, he can't be getting the "before a media timeout garbage minutes" he had been getting against quality competition or in close games (1 vs. USC, 3 vs. UW, 3 @ GB,  2 vs. LSU); he's too good for that.

Coach Autry said something along the lines of, "He wants to play 40 minutes a game, but I told him whatever you can give for the the time you are out there will help this team."
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: Big Papi on January 02, 2013, 02:35:03 PM
He played more because Jamil Wilson and Juan Anderson were in foul trouble in the first half.  His good play allowed him to play some minutes in the second half.
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: T-Bone on January 02, 2013, 03:31:43 PM
I like him.  I think he'll be a really nice player for Marquette this season and beyond. 

The one thing that still gets him off the floor is defensive awareness.  He had one glaring instance of being out of position that left UConn open down low for a dunk. 
However as his time on the floor as increased, these miscues are becoming fewer and fewer.  He's buying in, and getting it. 
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: jsglow on January 02, 2013, 03:52:20 PM
I think one advantage that Steve has is that he's played hoops against this kind of talent before.  Practice at Simeon every day. 

I'll expect him to continue to grow in Buzz' system this year and be an absolute monster next year.
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: Markusquette on January 02, 2013, 04:03:21 PM
Quote from: muwarrior69 on January 02, 2013, 01:27:14 PM
Derrick W, Duane W.

Maybe Duane has Jr. at the end of Wilson?
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: BCHoopster on January 02, 2013, 04:15:54 PM
Quote from: jsglow on January 02, 2013, 03:52:20 PM
I think one advantage that Steve has is that he's played hoops against this kind of talent before.  Practice at Simeon every day. 

I'll expect him to continue to grow in Buzz' system this year and be an absolute monster next year.

What defines a monster in your book? 
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: Goose on January 02, 2013, 04:57:07 PM
The kid looks like a baller to me. Excited to watch him play bigger role in upcoming games. The kid looks ready to me.
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: Marqevans on January 02, 2013, 05:17:46 PM
He might be gone in 2 years if he starts playing big minutes.
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: Canned Goods n Ammo on January 02, 2013, 05:19:24 PM
Quote from: Marqevans on January 02, 2013, 05:17:46 PM
He might be gone in 2 years if he starts playing big minutes.

Epic.

A player goes from getting spot minutes to a prediction of him leaving early for the NBA.

I love the interwebs.
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: sailwi on January 02, 2013, 06:23:19 PM
They need to fix the name on the back of his jersey, it is s. taylor Jr.  assuming because at one time we had TJ and him but TJ has been gone for 6 months.
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: LAMUfan on January 02, 2013, 08:04:14 PM
does he have an MU tattoo on his shoulder?  I've seen it a few times on TV, thought it was cool, I have a friend that says it was a fake tattoo, anyone know what the deal is?  He just might be my new favorite player if its real
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: MattyWarrior on January 02, 2013, 09:26:55 PM
He got it in Maui. Heard it was fake. At Simeon he was a workhorse, rarely missed a game and had very few bad games.
Played alot of center as a junior and senior to shut down the opponents big, Parker got most of the credit on the team
and last year was said to be a down year for talent in Chi-town so he didn't get much hype, but I was so stoked
when Buzz signed him..               
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: TexMex on January 02, 2013, 09:33:03 PM
If that's the case. Put me in coach.
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: Niv Berkowitz on January 03, 2013, 07:59:30 AM
I love Taylor. He's currently a cross between Lazar-as-a-freshman, only with Trend Blackledge's athleticism/energy and the gait of Kevin Durant (when he's running up/down the court, he looks like Durant...and no I'm not saying they are similar players at all...just appearance-wise).
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: jsglow on January 03, 2013, 08:38:21 AM
Quote from: BCHoopster on January 02, 2013, 04:15:54 PM
What defines a monster in your book? 

25 minutes, 10 points and 8 boards a game from a starting Sophomore #4.  I see fairly regular double doubles by his upperclassman years.  I suppose the 'monster' reference is more related to his physical presence.  The young man is simply chisled.
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: Dunk The Ball Eric on January 03, 2013, 11:02:56 AM
Really glad we have him instead of Phillip Nolan, who I thought got abused by Gardner in the post a few times. All Nolan could do was foul, he knew it, so did Gardner.
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: mhendrick on January 03, 2013, 12:26:04 PM
love Taylor, would also like to see Ferguson playing over Thomas,
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: BCHoopster on January 03, 2013, 12:29:58 PM
Quote from: jsglow on January 03, 2013, 08:38:21 AM
25 minutes, 10 points and 8 boards a game from a starting Sophomore #4.  I see fairly regular double doubles by his upperclassman years.  I suppose the 'monster' reference is more related to his physical presence.  The young man is simply chisled.

Not sure he will start next year, maybe but with Wilson, McKay and Anderson there next year, he will have to show improvement.  Time will tell. I do not see him in the monster mode yet,
because my definition and yours might be different.  A monster were guys like Maurice Lucas, Jim Chones, Jerome Whitehead, even David Boone physically he has a ways to go.   
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: slingkong on January 04, 2013, 08:12:46 AM
Quote from: warriorchick on January 02, 2013, 01:12:39 PM
Not if you don't have easy access to the roster - such as if you are watching on TV.  It will be interesting to see exactly what they do next year when they will have 2 D. Wilsons on the team.

Du. Wilson and De. Wilson would be my guess.
Title: Re: How about Stevie Jr.
Post by: MU82 on January 04, 2013, 08:29:51 AM
Quote from: BCHoopster on January 02, 2013, 04:15:54 PM
What defines a monster in your book? 

"Monster" connotes dominance.

Kevin Durant was a monster as a college freshman. So was Derrick Rose.

Steve Taylor is showing potential. He has a long way to go to be a "monster," as do most players in college basketball.
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev