Scholarship table
I have seen neither racism nor drivel from Mr. Merit on this site
It doesn't have to be. Yet so many who who fight for the unborn seem very happy to fight against certain populations of born people despite claiming to be Christian.As a disclaimer I am both Christian and believe life starts at conception. I just recognize that my belief shouldn't be forced onto others.
Who says? Well most pro-abortion politicians for one.It doesn't have to be. Yet so many who who fight for the unborn seem very happy to fight against certain populations of born people despite claiming to be Christian.As a disclaimer I am both Christian and believe life starts at conception. I just recognize that my belief shouldn't be forced onto others.
Then don't force me to call someone by their preferred pronoun.
Agreed. And don’t force medical treatments on people like vaccines. As a libertarian and Catholic, just let people be!
All I know is that from the day I heard my wife and I were expecting a child I had unconditional love for that child. Imo, there is nothing more wonderful than seeing a Mom see her new child the first time. It brings tears to my eyes every time I see a picture of Mom and their child. That 100% sums up my feeling on the topic.
I do think there should be a waiting period, should be the same amount of time as getting a gun.
TAMUI do know, Newsie is right on you knowing ball.
They're not babies you doofus. No one is killing babies, and if they are, it's murder. A clump of cells that can't live on it's own isn't a baby.Again, take your puritanical Fundemental Christian Extremism and move to a country that was founded upon it. This one certainly wasn't.
I mean, OK, but it's not like a woman can walk into their local Walmart to get an abortion. It's something that requires an appointment which, I would imagine, isn't a "see you in an hour" kind of thing.
Here's the waiting period list:https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/counseling-and-waiting-periods-abortion I think it should be at least 7 days, along with required counseling. Guns should be at least that long, with required training.
When you have nothing to say, scream racism. Works every time. The ultimate Trump card and sign of a fundamentally flawed argument.
Had RBG resigned, as she should have, during BO's presidency, today's event would not have taken place. So ultimately, the selfish, terminally ill justice, who was the guiding light for women's rights...fooked over women, aina?
I'm the left and I don't think that abortions should be any of the government's business. Ziggy's access to genital wart medication isn't questioned, so why should a woman's choice to terminate a pregnancy be? They're medical procedures and they're performed routinely all over the global north. If you want to draw the line 15 weeks that's fine, I guess, since there has to be a compromise. I can be baby stepped to go to 15 weeks since that is a reasonable enough amount of time to know of the pregnancy and discuss all options.
I’ve always thought 15 was a good mark. 12 is the mark for a number of countries in Europe, but 15 is good enough. I do struggle with the argument that it’s just a clump of cells at that point. I remember our ultrasound appt well before 15, and there were heartbeats, and dimension measurements. We knew the gender well before that mark. You can already test for abnormalities.Sure it’s a fetus, not a baby, but it’s not some nebulous cell arrangement. So I’ve always hated that argument past 8-10 weeks.Dicks, Alaska Airlines, and even Chase have already said they’d cover employee travel if their state bans abortions, which is pretty incredible
"In his opinion concurring with the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn the constitutional right to abortion established in Roe v. Wade, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that the high court should revisit all cases built on similar legal footing—including cases that guarantee the right to contraception, same-sex consensual sexual relations, and same-sex marriage.All three cases—and numerous other landmark decisions—are built upon the right to substantive due process found in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution, which prohibit the government from depriving “any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”https://www.muscoop.com/index.php?action=post;topic=63457.100;last_msg=1457054Conveniently for Mr. Pubic Hair guy, the Loving decision has a different legal rationale.