collapse

Resources

25-26 SOTG Tally

2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross6
James Jr4
Parham1
Stevens1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

2026-27 Depth Chart by GoldenEagles03
[Today at 12:18:03 PM]


Recruiting as of 5/15/26 by Vander Blue Man Group
[Today at 12:15:25 PM]


Colton Crowdis committed. by brewcity77
[Today at 12:08:36 PM]


NM by Jay Bee
[Today at 10:24:15 AM]


Hoosier beat down by Jay Bee
[June 02, 2026, 10:58:57 PM]


Best of luck to Ben by NCMUFan
[June 02, 2026, 04:11:10 PM]


Sad news - Barb Kellaher has stage 4 cancer by The Lens
[June 02, 2026, 02:01:08 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up:  NA

Marquette
87
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 2026
TV: NA
Schedule for 2025-26
Xavier
89

MU82

Quote from: #UnleashThePortal on Today at 09:23:12 AMSaving this qoute for when fru has 3 fouls in the first half against uconn.

FWIW, Hamilton had his best game of the season against UConn after Gold got into foul trouble, and he played a role in helping Marquette pull off one of the biggest upsets of the 2025-26 college basketball season.

But yes, point taken.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

Pakuni

Quote from: Vander Blue Man Group on Today at 08:44:22 AMI don't feel great about that option.  But the extent to which people think our back-up 5s can impact our season is ludicrous.

I haven't seen anyone suggest that the quality of the backup 5s in itself is likely to wreck the season, barring injury.

I see people who are frustrated because the staff chose not to address an obvious weakness when time and opportunity to do so existed, and that's been a recurring theme with this staff three seasons running now. Those choices came back to bite them the past two seasons. We'll find out if it happens again, but I imagine even you can understand the concern.

GoldenEagles03

Quote from: MU82 on Today at 09:25:26 AMFWIW, Hamilton had his best game of the season against UConn after Gold got into foul trouble, and he played a role in helping Marquette pull off one of the biggest upsets of the 2025-26 college basketball season.

But yes, point taken.

Only an upset because the team was one of the worst we have seen. I don't think Marquette beating UConn at home should ever be considered an upset. But that was the reality last year.
VIOLENCE!

The Sultan

Quote from: GoldenEagles03 on Today at 09:43:28 AMOnly an upset because the team was one of the worst we have seen. I don't think Marquette beating UConn at home should ever be considered an upset. But that was the reality last year.


Prior to last season, Shaka Smart was 2-8 against UConn, with the only two victories coming in 2022-23 at home and in the BET semis.

Like it or not, beating UConn at home was not only an upset last year, but pretty much has been throughout Shaka's tenure. And likely will be for the foreseeable future.
"I am one of those who think the best friend of a nation is he who most faithfully rebukes her for her sins—and he her worst enemy, who, under the specious and popular garb of patriotism, seeks to excuse, palliate, and defend them" - Frederick Douglass

Vander Blue Man Group

Quote from: #UnleashThePortal on Today at 09:23:12 AMSaving this qoute for when fru has 3 fouls in the first half against uconn.

 ::)

"Season" is a hard word to understand.

MU82

#80
Quote from: GoldenEagles03 on Today at 09:43:28 AMOnly an upset because the team was one of the worst we have seen. I don't think Marquette beating UConn at home should ever be considered an upset. But that was the reality last year.

 :o

You come up with the most bizarre takes. But it's part of the fun of ScoopLand.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

Jay Bee

Quote from: MU82 on Today at 09:25:26 AMFWIW, Hamilton had his best game of the season against UConn after Gold got into foul trouble, and he played a role in helping Marquette pull off one of the biggest upsets of the 2025-26 college basketball season.

But yes, point taken.

You're right. 18 poured in 4 points and corralled 2 rebounds (zero offensive) in his *18* minutes during that game.

Tarris Reed was shutdown for the entire game - only 7/10 for 16 points and 10 rebounds, 5 of them offensive! Backup center Eric Reibe could only muster 4 points and 3 offensive boards in his 11 minutes of backup duty.

Meanwhile, 18 dismantled UCONN's ability to shoot three-pointers, where they went 3/24 on the night.

Amazing stuff!
The portal is NOT closed.

Vander Blue Man Group

Quote from: Pakuni on Today at 09:37:17 AMI haven't seen anyone suggest that the quality of the backup 5s in itself is likely to wreck the season, barring injury.

I see people who are frustrated because the staff chose not to address an obvious weakness when time and opportunity to do so existed, and that's been a recurring theme with this staff three seasons running now. Those choices came back to bite them the past two seasons. We'll find out if it happens again, but I imagine even you can understand the concern.

"Even you can understand the concern".

Kind of difficult to respond to that in a manner that won't get me banned so I'll let it be.

I've never said I had no concerns.  I was excited about Sheek - he is a loss.  I would have liked the staff to add someone to replace him. 

The pickings were slim after Sheek was poached.  Why do you fail to acknowledge there may not have been a fit when it comes to talent, culture and compensation?

Jay Bee

Quote from: Vander Blue Man Group on Today at 10:25:46 AMThe pickings were slim after Sheek was poached.  Why do you fail to acknowledge there may not have been a fit when it comes to talent, culture and compensation?

Tough to find a fit when you oddly believe 18 is a very good player and (probably reasonably believe) an A+ culture guy.
The portal is NOT closed.

TallTitan34

Quote from: GoldenEagles03 on Today at 09:43:28 AMOnly an upset because the team was one of the worst we have seen. I don't think Marquette beating UConn at home should ever be considered an upset. But that was the reality last year.

I'm always thankful we took care of business in that trap game against UConn in 2006.

MU82

Quote from: Jay Bee on Today at 10:20:24 AMYou're right. 18 poured in 4 points and corralled 2 rebounds (zero offensive) in his *18* minutes during that game.

Tarris Reed was shutdown for the entire game - only 7/10 for 16 points and 10 rebounds, 5 of them offensive! Backup center Eric Reibe could only muster 4 points and 3 offensive boards in his 11 minutes of backup duty.

Meanwhile, 18 dismantled UCONN's ability to shoot three-pointers, where they went 3/24 on the night.

Amazing stuff!

Thanks for acknowledging that you didn't watch the game.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

Its DJOver

Quote from: MU82 on Today at 10:38:49 AMThanks for acknowledging that you didn't watch the game.

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/playbyplay/_/gameId/401822973

Yea, most of the damage was done when Caedin was out. Reed had 6 points in the first 3.5 minutes of the game before Caedin even made an appearance. 4 more in the first 50 seconds of the second, again with no Caedin. That's 10 out of his 16 in just over 4 minute combined span when Caedin wasn't in the game. 

If Caedin can play like he did against UCONN consistently, he'll be a perfectly acceptable backup. His usage was below 15 last year. If he only attempts three shots a game, I don't really care if one is a 3 foot air ball as long as the other two are 0 foot dunks. On the offensive end, set screens and be in the right spot for dump offs/put backs.  Defensively, I wish he didn't hedge as hard on the PnR, but that's less on him/his ability and more on the staff's scheme.  With another 250lb C on the roster, I would think we would see less of that overall.
Scoop motto:
Quote from: ATL MU Warrior on February 06, 2025, 06:04:29 PMthe stats bear that out, but

MUDPT

Quote from: Its DJOver on Today at 11:28:29 AMhttps://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/playbyplay/_/gameId/401822973

Yea, most of the damage was done when Caedin was out. Reed had 6 points in the first 3.5 minutes of the game before Caedin even made an appearance. 4 more in the first 50 seconds of the second, again with no Caedin. That's 10 out of his 16 in just over 4 minute combined span when Caedin wasn't in the game. 

If Caedin can play like he did against UCONN consistently, he'll be a perfectly acceptable backup. His usage was below 15 last year. If he only attempts three shots a game, I don't really care if one is a 3 foot air ball as long as the other two are 0 foot dunks. On the offensive end, set screens and be in the right spot for dump offs/put backs.  Defensively, I wish he didn't hedge as hard on the PnR, but that's less on him/his ability and more on the staff's scheme.  With another 250lb C on the roster, I would think we would see less of that overall.

This is where I'm at. He's miscast in the "Oso" role, catching on the FT line, facilitating offense. He could be fine in the dunker spot with absolutely no dribbling. It's up to the coaches to find schemes which are going to be different when Fru is in, versus Hamilton.

GoldenEagles03

Quote from: MU82 on Today at 10:17:43 AM:o

You come up with the most bizarre takes. But it's part of the fun of ScoopLand.

What don't you agree with? Marquette is routinely near the top of college hoops in attendance. They spend a lot of money. This is a great basketball program. We should expect to win in Milwaukee against everyone and anyone.

Everyone will lose games at home, no big deal, but I still think we should expect to win. Have some pride in the program!
VIOLENCE!

MU82

Quote from: GoldenEagles03 on Today at 12:00:53 PMWhat don't you agree with? Marquette is routinely near the top of college hoops in attendance. They spend a lot of money. This is a great basketball program. We should expect to win in Milwaukee against everyone and anyone.

Everyone will lose games at home, no big deal, but I still think we should expect to win. Have some pride in the program!

I'm one of the biggest optimists here, and I expect lots of winning.

But the fact is that UConn was a big favorite in that game, and we upset them. That you don't think we should ever be a home underdog is beside the point.
"It's not how white men fight." - Tucker Carlson

"Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." - George Washington

"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

wadesworld

Quote from: GoldenEagles03 on Today at 09:43:28 AMOnly an upset because the team was one of the worst we have seen. I don't think Marquette beating UConn at home should ever be considered an upset. But that was the reality last year.

MU over UCONN at home should never be considered an upset?  The program that has won 22% of the last 27 national championships?

wadesworld

Quote from: The Sultan on Today at 06:36:41 AM"Well embedded moles" weren't leaking stuff out to Rothstein about Williams and Mbao. Furthermore they lasted two and one seasons here respectively. It's a nonsense comparison. They were nothing more than novelty acts - not players expected to play significant minutes.

I think what concerns people was last year's complete misevaluation of Hamilton. And now they are going to roll it back with him as a back-up. I completely get why people don't feel great about that option.

I do have to admit that I got a chuckle out of the posters who respond to "Well yeah Caedin may not have played many minutes, but he played first half minutes!" are the ones who like, "Well Williams didn't play many minutes, so who cares if he started?"

GoldenEagles03

Quote from: MU82 on Today at 12:08:20 PMI'm one of the biggest optimists here, and I expect lots of winning.

But the fact is that UConn was a big favorite in that game, and we upset them. That you don't think we should ever be a home underdog is beside the point.

We shouldn't have seasons like last year, ever. That's part of the point. Of course Marquette will be underdogs at home at times. That is just college basketball. But last year was legitimately shocking because of how terrible the team was. If Marquette was even a .500 team, UConn dropping a game in Milwaukee wouldn't be any bit surprising.

My point is that we should never have to feel like a game is impossible to win in Milwaukee. Sure, we will lose games in Milwaukee. Fine. But this place has been and should be a fortress. I look forward to getting back to that.
VIOLENCE!

Previous topic - Next topic